Stacha F I Reumers, Fleur L P Bongaerts, Frank-Erik de Leeuw, Bart P C van de Warrenburg, Dennis J L G Schutter, Roy P C Kessels
{"title":"Cognition in cerebellar disorders: What's in the profile? A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Stacha F I Reumers, Fleur L P Bongaerts, Frank-Erik de Leeuw, Bart P C van de Warrenburg, Dennis J L G Schutter, Roy P C Kessels","doi":"10.1007/s00415-025-12967-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to examine the profile and extent of cognitive deficits in patients with cerebellar disorders, and to provide a complete overview of the cognitive domains that might be affected in the Cerebellar Cognitive Affective Syndrome (CCAS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, and Web of Science were systematically searched to 17-07-2024. Studies were considered if the participants were adult patients with a clinical diagnosis of cerebellar disorder and were neuropsychological assessed. Outcomes were grouped into the domains of processing speed, language, social cognition, executive function, visuospatial skills, episodic memory, verbal intelligence, attention, and working memory. All aetiologies were included for first evaluation and patients were assigned to one of two groups (focal vs. degenerative) for secondary evaluation. Random-effects models were employed for the meta-analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>129 studies with a total of 3140 patients with cerebellar disorders were included. Patients performed significantly worse compared to control/standardized data in all domains. Deficits were most pronounced in processing speed, ES [95% CI] = - 0.83 [- 1.04, - 0.63], language, ES [95% CI] = - 0.81 [- 0.94, - 0.67], and social cognition, ES [95% CI] = - 0.81 [- 1.19, - 0.42]. Cognitive impairment varied between patients with focal cerebellar lesions and degenerative cerebellar disorders, but was overall worse in the degenerative group.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Cerebellar disorders can impact many cognitive domains, extending beyond executive functioning, visuospatial skills, and language. These outcomes contribute to a broader understanding of the cerebellum's role in cognition and sheds light on the cognitive deficits associated with cerebellar disorders.</p>","PeriodicalId":16558,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neurology","volume":"272 3","pages":"250"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11885410/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-025-12967-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to examine the profile and extent of cognitive deficits in patients with cerebellar disorders, and to provide a complete overview of the cognitive domains that might be affected in the Cerebellar Cognitive Affective Syndrome (CCAS).
Methods: MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, and Web of Science were systematically searched to 17-07-2024. Studies were considered if the participants were adult patients with a clinical diagnosis of cerebellar disorder and were neuropsychological assessed. Outcomes were grouped into the domains of processing speed, language, social cognition, executive function, visuospatial skills, episodic memory, verbal intelligence, attention, and working memory. All aetiologies were included for first evaluation and patients were assigned to one of two groups (focal vs. degenerative) for secondary evaluation. Random-effects models were employed for the meta-analyses.
Results: 129 studies with a total of 3140 patients with cerebellar disorders were included. Patients performed significantly worse compared to control/standardized data in all domains. Deficits were most pronounced in processing speed, ES [95% CI] = - 0.83 [- 1.04, - 0.63], language, ES [95% CI] = - 0.81 [- 0.94, - 0.67], and social cognition, ES [95% CI] = - 0.81 [- 1.19, - 0.42]. Cognitive impairment varied between patients with focal cerebellar lesions and degenerative cerebellar disorders, but was overall worse in the degenerative group.
Discussion: Cerebellar disorders can impact many cognitive domains, extending beyond executive functioning, visuospatial skills, and language. These outcomes contribute to a broader understanding of the cerebellum's role in cognition and sheds light on the cognitive deficits associated with cerebellar disorders.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Neurology is an international peer-reviewed journal which provides a source for publishing original communications and reviews on clinical neurology covering the whole field.
In addition, Letters to the Editors serve as a forum for clinical cases and the exchange of ideas which highlight important new findings. A section on Neurological progress serves to summarise the major findings in certain fields of neurology. Commentaries on new developments in clinical neuroscience, which may be commissioned or submitted, are published as editorials.
Every neurologist interested in the current diagnosis and treatment of neurological disorders needs access to the information contained in this valuable journal.