Theoretical Perspectives on Hookah Smoking Behavior: A Scoping Review of Studies Among Young Adults in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Christina Asiedua, Elakeche Abah, Matthew Asare
{"title":"Theoretical Perspectives on Hookah Smoking Behavior: A Scoping Review of Studies Among Young Adults in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.","authors":"Christina Asiedua, Elakeche Abah, Matthew Asare","doi":"10.1007/s10900-025-01449-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Hookah smoking among young adults is a growing public health concern, especially in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Despite its prevalence, comprehensive reviews evaluating theoretical frameworks used to study this behavior are lacking. This scoping review synthesized studies examining hookah smoking behaviors among young adults in LMICs. A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Google Scholar, and CINAHL using keywords such as \"Hookah OR Waterpipe OR Shisha,\" \"Adverse effects OR Harmful Effects,\" \"Young adults OR Adolescents,\" \"Theory,\" and \"Low-middle-income countries.\" Articles meeting predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria were screened using Covidence, and data on prevalence, predictors, and theoretical frameworks were extracted. The review included 28 studies involving 13,150 young adults with an average age of 19.2 years. Hookah use prevalence ranged from 2.6 to 89.4%, with a pooled prevalence of 26.4%. Frequently applied theoretical frameworks included the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) and Social Cognitive Theory (SCT), along with the Protection Motivation Theory and PRECEDE-PROCEED. Facilitators of hookah use included subjective norms, favorable attitudes, perceived low risk, environmental influences, and limited awareness of health risks. Protective factors included self-efficacy, perceived risks, awareness of harmful effects, and anti-smoking attitudes. Interventions based on TPB and SCT showed positive outcomes, though some failed, highlighting the need for culturally sensitive approaches. The findings emphasize the importance of education and policy measures targeting both individual and environmental factors to reduce hookah smoking prevalence and its associated risks in LMICs.</p>","PeriodicalId":15550,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Community Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Community Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10900-025-01449-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Hookah smoking among young adults is a growing public health concern, especially in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Despite its prevalence, comprehensive reviews evaluating theoretical frameworks used to study this behavior are lacking. This scoping review synthesized studies examining hookah smoking behaviors among young adults in LMICs. A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Google Scholar, and CINAHL using keywords such as "Hookah OR Waterpipe OR Shisha," "Adverse effects OR Harmful Effects," "Young adults OR Adolescents," "Theory," and "Low-middle-income countries." Articles meeting predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria were screened using Covidence, and data on prevalence, predictors, and theoretical frameworks were extracted. The review included 28 studies involving 13,150 young adults with an average age of 19.2 years. Hookah use prevalence ranged from 2.6 to 89.4%, with a pooled prevalence of 26.4%. Frequently applied theoretical frameworks included the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) and Social Cognitive Theory (SCT), along with the Protection Motivation Theory and PRECEDE-PROCEED. Facilitators of hookah use included subjective norms, favorable attitudes, perceived low risk, environmental influences, and limited awareness of health risks. Protective factors included self-efficacy, perceived risks, awareness of harmful effects, and anti-smoking attitudes. Interventions based on TPB and SCT showed positive outcomes, though some failed, highlighting the need for culturally sensitive approaches. The findings emphasize the importance of education and policy measures targeting both individual and environmental factors to reduce hookah smoking prevalence and its associated risks in LMICs.

水烟吸烟行为的理论视角:对中低收入国家年轻人研究的范围综述。
青年人中使用水烟是一个日益严重的公共卫生问题,特别是在低收入和中等收入国家。尽管它很普遍,但缺乏对用于研究这种行为的理论框架进行全面评估的综述。本综述综合了低收入中国家年轻人水烟吸烟行为的研究。在PubMed, Embase,谷歌Scholar和CINAHL中进行了系统搜索,使用关键词如“水烟或水烟或水烟”,“不良影响或有害影响”,“年轻人或青少年”,“理论”和“中低收入国家”。使用Covidence筛选符合预定义纳入和排除标准的文章,并提取有关患病率、预测因素和理论框架的数据。该综述包括28项研究,涉及13150名平均年龄为19.2岁的年轻人。水烟使用率从2.6%到89.4%不等,总患病率为26.4%。常用的理论框架包括计划行为理论(TPB)和社会认知理论(SCT),以及保护动机理论和先行-进行理论。水烟使用的促进因素包括主观规范、有利的态度、感知到的低风险、环境影响和对健康风险的有限认识。保护因素包括自我效能、感知风险、有害影响意识和反吸烟态度。基于TPB和SCT的干预显示出积极的结果,尽管有些失败了,强调了文化敏感方法的必要性。研究结果强调了针对个人和环境因素的教育和政策措施的重要性,以减少中低收入国家的水烟吸烟率及其相关风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.80
自引率
1.70%
发文量
113
期刊介绍: The Journal of Community Health is a peer-reviewed publication that offers original articles on research, teaching, and the practice of community health and public health. Coverage includes public health, epidemiology, preventive medicine, health promotion, disease prevention, environmental and occupational health, health policy and management, and health disparities. The Journal does not publish articles on clinical medicine. Serving as a forum for the exchange of ideas, the Journal features articles on research that serve the educational needs of public and community health personnel.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信