{"title":"Cerebral foreign body reaction (CFBR) after endovascular treatments is a rare event to be aware of: case series and review of literature.","authors":"Giorgia Atanasio, Salvatore Bertino, Mariano Velo, Agostino Tessitore, Claudio Zaccone, Alessio Masaracchio, Francesca Granata, Sergio Vinci, Antonio Toscano, Olimpia Musumeci","doi":"10.1007/s00415-025-12957-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cerebral foreign body reaction (CFBR) due to hydrophilic polymer embolization is a rarely diagnosed complication of cerebral endovascular procedures. Despite the considerable use of endovascular treatment in the literature, few cases of CFBR have been described so far. Our main objective is to describe three patients who were diagnosed at our center with CFBR and provide an overview of the existing literature. In these three cases, cerebral aneurysms were treated with different endovascular techniques as Contour device implantation, coil embolization, and flow diversion stent. Only one patient manifested focal neurological signs characterized by contralateral strength deficit, dysarthria, and headache. In the other two cases, the lesions were asymptomatic and were found at follow-up imaging. Brain MRI showed hyperintense lesions in FLAIR sequences in subcortical white matter without diffusivity restriction on diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) corresponding to contrast-enhancing foci in T1-weighted images, suggestive of CFBR. Pathophysiology and predisposing factors are still unclear. Corticosteroid therapy led to marked improvement at neuroimaging in all cases and to a clinical remission in the first case. Our data confirm that CFBR is an underestimated complication to be aware of, in both neurological and neuroradiological practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":16558,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neurology","volume":"272 3","pages":"251"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-025-12957-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Cerebral foreign body reaction (CFBR) due to hydrophilic polymer embolization is a rarely diagnosed complication of cerebral endovascular procedures. Despite the considerable use of endovascular treatment in the literature, few cases of CFBR have been described so far. Our main objective is to describe three patients who were diagnosed at our center with CFBR and provide an overview of the existing literature. In these three cases, cerebral aneurysms were treated with different endovascular techniques as Contour device implantation, coil embolization, and flow diversion stent. Only one patient manifested focal neurological signs characterized by contralateral strength deficit, dysarthria, and headache. In the other two cases, the lesions were asymptomatic and were found at follow-up imaging. Brain MRI showed hyperintense lesions in FLAIR sequences in subcortical white matter without diffusivity restriction on diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) corresponding to contrast-enhancing foci in T1-weighted images, suggestive of CFBR. Pathophysiology and predisposing factors are still unclear. Corticosteroid therapy led to marked improvement at neuroimaging in all cases and to a clinical remission in the first case. Our data confirm that CFBR is an underestimated complication to be aware of, in both neurological and neuroradiological practice.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Neurology is an international peer-reviewed journal which provides a source for publishing original communications and reviews on clinical neurology covering the whole field.
In addition, Letters to the Editors serve as a forum for clinical cases and the exchange of ideas which highlight important new findings. A section on Neurological progress serves to summarise the major findings in certain fields of neurology. Commentaries on new developments in clinical neuroscience, which may be commissioned or submitted, are published as editorials.
Every neurologist interested in the current diagnosis and treatment of neurological disorders needs access to the information contained in this valuable journal.