Blood phosphorylated Tau217 distinguishes amyloid-positive from amyloid-negative subjects in the Alzheimer's disease continuum. A systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Annibale Antonioni, Emanuela Maria Raho, Francesco Di Lorenzo, Lamberto Manzoli, Maria Elena Flacco, Giacomo Koch
{"title":"Blood phosphorylated Tau217 distinguishes amyloid-positive from amyloid-negative subjects in the Alzheimer's disease continuum. A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Annibale Antonioni, Emanuela Maria Raho, Francesco Di Lorenzo, Lamberto Manzoli, Maria Elena Flacco, Giacomo Koch","doi":"10.1007/s00415-025-12996-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the leading cause of dementia worldwide, and cost-effective tools to detect amyloid pathology are urgently needed. Blood-based Tau phosphorylated at threonine 217 (pTau217) seems promising, but its reliability as a proxy for cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) status and ability to identify patients within the AD spectrum remain unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis on the potential of blood pTau217 to differentiate amyloid-positive (A+) and amyloid-negative (A-) subjects. We included original studies reporting quantitative data on pTau217 concentrations in both blood and CSF in the AD continuum. The single-group meta-analysis computed the pooled pTau217 levels in blood and in CSF, separately in the A+ and A- groups, while the head-to-head meta-analysis compared the mean pTau217 concentrations in the A+ versus A- subjects, both in blood and CSF, stratifying by assessment method in both cases.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten studies (819 A+; 1055 A-) were included. The mean pTau217 levels resulted higher in CSF than in blood and, crucially, in A+ individuals than in A- ones, regardless of the laboratory method employed. Most importantly, all laboratory techniques reliably distinguished A+ from A- subjects, whether applied to CSF or blood samples.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These results confirm that blood-based pTau217 is a reliable marker of amyloid pathology with significant implications for clinical practice in the AD continuum. Indeed, pTau217 might be a non-invasive, scalable biomarker for early AD detection, reducing the reliance on more invasive, expansive, and less accessible methods.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>Prospero CRD42024565187.</p>","PeriodicalId":16558,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neurology","volume":"272 3","pages":"252"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11885345/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-025-12996-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the leading cause of dementia worldwide, and cost-effective tools to detect amyloid pathology are urgently needed. Blood-based Tau phosphorylated at threonine 217 (pTau217) seems promising, but its reliability as a proxy for cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) status and ability to identify patients within the AD spectrum remain unclear.

Methods: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis on the potential of blood pTau217 to differentiate amyloid-positive (A+) and amyloid-negative (A-) subjects. We included original studies reporting quantitative data on pTau217 concentrations in both blood and CSF in the AD continuum. The single-group meta-analysis computed the pooled pTau217 levels in blood and in CSF, separately in the A+ and A- groups, while the head-to-head meta-analysis compared the mean pTau217 concentrations in the A+ versus A- subjects, both in blood and CSF, stratifying by assessment method in both cases.

Results: Ten studies (819 A+; 1055 A-) were included. The mean pTau217 levels resulted higher in CSF than in blood and, crucially, in A+ individuals than in A- ones, regardless of the laboratory method employed. Most importantly, all laboratory techniques reliably distinguished A+ from A- subjects, whether applied to CSF or blood samples.

Conclusions: These results confirm that blood-based pTau217 is a reliable marker of amyloid pathology with significant implications for clinical practice in the AD continuum. Indeed, pTau217 might be a non-invasive, scalable biomarker for early AD detection, reducing the reliance on more invasive, expansive, and less accessible methods.

Clinical trial registration: Prospero CRD42024565187.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Neurology
Journal of Neurology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
5.00%
发文量
558
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurology is an international peer-reviewed journal which provides a source for publishing original communications and reviews on clinical neurology covering the whole field. In addition, Letters to the Editors serve as a forum for clinical cases and the exchange of ideas which highlight important new findings. A section on Neurological progress serves to summarise the major findings in certain fields of neurology. Commentaries on new developments in clinical neuroscience, which may be commissioned or submitted, are published as editorials. Every neurologist interested in the current diagnosis and treatment of neurological disorders needs access to the information contained in this valuable journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信