Drug-coated balloon in patients with in-stent restenosis: A prospective observational study.

IF 1.4 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS

Indian heart journal Pub Date : 2025-03-03 DOI:10.1016/j.ihj.2025.03.003

Shuvanan Ray, Siddhartha Bandyopadhyay, Prithwiraj Bhattacharjee, Priyam Mukherjee, Suman Karmakar, Pallab Bose, Basabendra Choudhury, Deepankar Paul, Avik Karak

{"title":"Drug-coated balloon in patients with in-stent restenosis: A prospective observational study.","authors":"Shuvanan Ray, Siddhartha Bandyopadhyay, Prithwiraj Bhattacharjee, Priyam Mukherjee, Suman Karmakar, Pallab Bose, Basabendra Choudhury, Deepankar Paul, Avik Karak","doi":"10.1016/j.ihj.2025.03.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: The aim of this study was to compare the safety and efficacy of paclitaxel-coated balloons (PCB) and sirolimus-coated balloons (SCB) in patients with in-stent restenosis (ISR).Methods: This prospective, observational, single-centre pilot study enrolled 85 patients diagnosed with drug-eluting stent ISR. For all the eligible patients, various clinical baseline characteristics were collected, and angiography was performed to evaluate the lesion characteristics. After assessment, patients were treated with either PCB or SCB based on our center's time-based approach. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) imagining was used to assess the pre- and post-procedural minimal stent area (MSA). All the patients were followed up and major adverse cardiovascular events were documented for patients in both the groups.Results: Of total 85 patients with ISR, 32 underwent treatment with PCB and 53 with SCB. A significant difference was noted in the post procedural MSA in both the groups (p = 0.005) and the values were 7.01 ± 1.11 mm2 and 8.01 ± 1.70 mm2 for PCB and SCB group, respectively. At median follow-up of 3.8 years, no cardiac death was noted in PCB group and one death was reported in SCB group (p = 0.459). In PCB group, target lesion revascularization (TLR) was noted in one (12.5 %) patient, while in SCB group TLR was noted in four (16.5 %) patients (p = 0.920).Conclusion: Both PCB and SCB are found to be effective and safe in treating in patients with drug-eluting stents-ISR. Also, the use of DCB with imaging techniques like IVUS enhances treatment outcomes and optimizes patient care in ISR treatment.","PeriodicalId":13384,"journal":{"name":"Indian heart journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian heart journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ihj.2025.03.003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study was to compare the safety and efficacy of paclitaxel-coated balloons (PCB) and sirolimus-coated balloons (SCB) in patients with in-stent restenosis (ISR).

Methods: This prospective, observational, single-centre pilot study enrolled 85 patients diagnosed with drug-eluting stent ISR. For all the eligible patients, various clinical baseline characteristics were collected, and angiography was performed to evaluate the lesion characteristics. After assessment, patients were treated with either PCB or SCB based on our center's time-based approach. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) imagining was used to assess the pre- and post-procedural minimal stent area (MSA). All the patients were followed up and major adverse cardiovascular events were documented for patients in both the groups.

Results: Of total 85 patients with ISR, 32 underwent treatment with PCB and 53 with SCB. A significant difference was noted in the post procedural MSA in both the groups (p = 0.005) and the values were 7.01 ± 1.11 mm² and 8.01 ± 1.70 mm² for PCB and SCB group, respectively. At median follow-up of 3.8 years, no cardiac death was noted in PCB group and one death was reported in SCB group (p = 0.459). In PCB group, target lesion revascularization (TLR) was noted in one (12.5 %) patient, while in SCB group TLR was noted in four (16.5 %) patients (p = 0.920).

Conclusion: Both PCB and SCB are found to be effective and safe in treating in patients with drug-eluting stents-ISR. Also, the use of DCB with imaging techniques like IVUS enhances treatment outcomes and optimizes patient care in ISR treatment.

查看原文本刊更多论文

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Indian heart journal CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-

CiteScore

2.60

自引率

6.70%

发文量

审稿时长

52 days

期刊介绍： Indian Heart Journal (IHJ) is the official peer-reviewed open access journal of Cardiological Society of India and accepts articles for publication from across the globe. The journal aims to promote high quality research and serve as a platform for dissemination of scientific information in cardiology with particular focus on South Asia. The journal aims to publish cutting edge research in the field of clinical as well as non-clinical cardiology - including cardiovascular medicine and surgery. Some of the topics covered are Heart Failure, Coronary Artery Disease, Hypertension, Interventional Cardiology, Cardiac Surgery, Valvular Heart Disease, Pulmonary Hypertension and Infective Endocarditis. IHJ open access invites original research articles, research briefs, perspective, case reports, case vignette, cardiovascular images, cardiovascular graphics, research letters, correspondence, reader forum, and interesting photographs, for publication. IHJ open access also publishes theme-based special issues and abstracts of papers presented at the annual conference of the Cardiological Society of India.