Root Cause Analysis and Risk of Malignancy of Non-Diagnostic Category per the Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Amr Ali, Saroja Geetha, Mohammed Abdelwahed, Nourhan Ahmed, Yonah Ziemba, Karen Chau, Seema Khutti, Cecilia Gimenez, Kasturi Das, Deepika Savant
{"title":"Root Cause Analysis and Risk of Malignancy of Non-Diagnostic Category per the Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology","authors":"Amr Ali,&nbsp;Saroja Geetha,&nbsp;Mohammed Abdelwahed,&nbsp;Nourhan Ahmed,&nbsp;Yonah Ziemba,&nbsp;Karen Chau,&nbsp;Seema Khutti,&nbsp;Cecilia Gimenez,&nbsp;Kasturi Das,&nbsp;Deepika Savant","doi":"10.1002/dc.25454","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>We aim to perform a root cause analysis (RCA) of the non-diagnostic (ND) category of the Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The salivary gland fine needle aspiration (FNA) samples with ND diagnosis and corresponding surgical resections from 2013 to 2023, in the age group of 18 years and above, were included in the cohort for RCA. The cytology and surgical resection slides of cases from this RCA cohort were reviewed. The demographic parameters, clinical features, radiologic characteristics, usage of rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE), corresponding surgical diagnosis, and repeat FNA were noted.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 2292 FNAs were performed between 2013 and 2023, of which 354 cases were ND. RCA was performed on 57 (16%) ND FNA cases that had corresponding surgical resection. The causes were grouped as man, method, machine, and material related. The primary cause predominantly was man-related sampling errors in 36 (63%) cases. There were no interpretative errors by the pathologist. The second most common primary cause was material related, found in 21 (37%) cases, due to cystic, fibrotic, vascular, and small lesions. The most common secondary cause was method related, in which 41 (72%) cases had no image guidance. There were no machine-related causes. The risk of malignancy in the RCA cohort was 17%.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Majority causes of ND cytology were method-related due to lack of image guidance and ROSE. This proves that the FNA procedure under radiologic guidance with ROSE is an effective way to circumvent ND cytology of salivary gland FNAs.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":11349,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostic Cytopathology","volume":"53 6","pages":"272-282"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostic Cytopathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/dc.25454","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

We aim to perform a root cause analysis (RCA) of the non-diagnostic (ND) category of the Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology.

Methods

The salivary gland fine needle aspiration (FNA) samples with ND diagnosis and corresponding surgical resections from 2013 to 2023, in the age group of 18 years and above, were included in the cohort for RCA. The cytology and surgical resection slides of cases from this RCA cohort were reviewed. The demographic parameters, clinical features, radiologic characteristics, usage of rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE), corresponding surgical diagnosis, and repeat FNA were noted.

Results

A total of 2292 FNAs were performed between 2013 and 2023, of which 354 cases were ND. RCA was performed on 57 (16%) ND FNA cases that had corresponding surgical resection. The causes were grouped as man, method, machine, and material related. The primary cause predominantly was man-related sampling errors in 36 (63%) cases. There were no interpretative errors by the pathologist. The second most common primary cause was material related, found in 21 (37%) cases, due to cystic, fibrotic, vascular, and small lesions. The most common secondary cause was method related, in which 41 (72%) cases had no image guidance. There were no machine-related causes. The risk of malignancy in the RCA cohort was 17%.

Conclusion

Majority causes of ND cytology were method-related due to lack of image guidance and ROSE. This proves that the FNA procedure under radiologic guidance with ROSE is an effective way to circumvent ND cytology of salivary gland FNAs.

根据米兰系统报告唾液腺细胞病理学的非诊断类恶性肿瘤的根本原因分析和风险。
简介:我们的目标是对报告唾液腺细胞病理学的米兰系统的非诊断性(ND)类别进行根本原因分析(RCA)。方法:将2013 ~ 2023年年龄在18岁及以上的经ND诊断并相应手术切除的唾液腺细针抽吸(FNA)标本纳入RCA队列。我们回顾了这个RCA队列病例的细胞学和手术切除切片。记录患者的人口学参数、临床特征、放射学特征、快速现场评估(ROSE)的使用、相应的手术诊断和重复FNA。结果:2013 - 2023年共行FNAs 2292例,其中ND 354例。57例(16%)ND FNA患者行RCA,并行相应的手术切除。原因分为人、方法、机器和材料。在36例(63%)病例中,主要原因是与人为相关的抽样错误。病理学家没有解释错误。第二个最常见的主要原因是物质相关,在21例(37%)病例中发现,由于囊性、纤维化、血管性和小病变。最常见的继发原因是方法相关,其中41例(72%)没有图像引导。没有与机器有关的原因。在RCA队列中,恶性肿瘤的风险为17%。结论:ND细胞学的主要原因是由于缺乏图像引导和ROSE所致的方法相关。这证明放射学指导下的FNA手术是规避唾液腺FNAs ND细胞学的有效途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Diagnostic Cytopathology
Diagnostic Cytopathology 医学-病理学
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
163
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Diagnostic Cytopathology is intended to provide a forum for the exchange of information in the field of cytopathology, with special emphasis on the practical, clinical aspects of the discipline. The editors invite original scientific articles, as well as special review articles, feature articles, and letters to the editor, from laboratory professionals engaged in the practice of cytopathology. Manuscripts are accepted for publication on the basis of scientific merit, practical significance, and suitability for publication in a journal dedicated to this discipline. Original articles can be considered only with the understanding that they have never been published before and that they have not been submitted for simultaneous review to another publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信