Patients prefer human psychiatrists over chatbots: a cross-sectional study.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Croatian Medical Journal Pub Date : 2025-02-28
Goran Arbanas, Ante Periša, Ivan Biliškov, Jelena Sušac, Mirela Badurina, Dahna Arbanas
{"title":"Patients prefer human psychiatrists over chatbots: a cross-sectional study.","authors":"Goran Arbanas, Ante Periša, Ivan Biliškov, Jelena Sušac, Mirela Badurina, Dahna Arbanas","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To rate the level of patients' satisfaction with responses on questions regarding mental health provided by human psychiatrists, pharmacists, and chatbot platforms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study enrolled 89 patients who were pharmacologically treated for their mental disorder in one institution in Croatia and one in Bosnia and Herzegovina during October 2023. They asked psychiatrists, pharmacists, ChatGPT, and one Croatian chatbot questions about their mental disorder and medications and rated the satisfaction with the responses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Almost half of the patients had used ChatGPT before the study, and only 12.4% had used the Croatian platform. The patients were most satisfied with the information provided by psychiatrists (4.67 out of 5 about mental disorder and 4.51 about medications), followed by pharmacists (3.94 about medications), ChatGPT (3.66 about mental disorder and 3.45 about medications), and the Croatian platform (3.66 about mental disorder and 3.44 about medications). Almost half of the participants believed it was easier for them to put a question to a psychiatrist than to a chatbot, and only 10% claimed it was easier to ask ChatGPT.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with mental health disorders were more satisfied with responses from their psychiatrists than from chatbots, and satisfaction with chatbots' knowledge on mental disorders and medications was still too low to justify their usage in these patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":10796,"journal":{"name":"Croatian Medical Journal","volume":"66 1","pages":"13-19"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11947973/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Croatian Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To rate the level of patients' satisfaction with responses on questions regarding mental health provided by human psychiatrists, pharmacists, and chatbot platforms.

Methods: This cross-sectional study enrolled 89 patients who were pharmacologically treated for their mental disorder in one institution in Croatia and one in Bosnia and Herzegovina during October 2023. They asked psychiatrists, pharmacists, ChatGPT, and one Croatian chatbot questions about their mental disorder and medications and rated the satisfaction with the responses.

Results: Almost half of the patients had used ChatGPT before the study, and only 12.4% had used the Croatian platform. The patients were most satisfied with the information provided by psychiatrists (4.67 out of 5 about mental disorder and 4.51 about medications), followed by pharmacists (3.94 about medications), ChatGPT (3.66 about mental disorder and 3.45 about medications), and the Croatian platform (3.66 about mental disorder and 3.44 about medications). Almost half of the participants believed it was easier for them to put a question to a psychiatrist than to a chatbot, and only 10% claimed it was easier to ask ChatGPT.

Conclusion: Patients with mental health disorders were more satisfied with responses from their psychiatrists than from chatbots, and satisfaction with chatbots' knowledge on mental disorders and medications was still too low to justify their usage in these patients.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Croatian Medical Journal
Croatian Medical Journal 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
105
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Croatian Medical Journal (CMJ) is an international peer reviewed journal open to scientists from all fields of biomedicine and health related research. Although CMJ welcomes all contributions that increase and expand on medical knowledge, the two areas are of the special interest: topics globally relevant for biomedicine and health and medicine in developing and emerging countries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信