Advances in risk prediction models for cancer-related cognitive impairment.

IF 3.2 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Ran Duan, ZiLi Wen, Ting Zhang, Juan Liu, Tong Feng, Tao Ren
{"title":"Advances in risk prediction models for cancer-related cognitive impairment.","authors":"Ran Duan, ZiLi Wen, Ting Zhang, Juan Liu, Tong Feng, Tao Ren","doi":"10.1007/s10238-025-01590-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cancer-related cognitive impairment (CRCI) has emerged as a significant long-term complication in cancer survivors, particularly those undergoing chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or targeted therapies. Despite advances in treatment, CRCI affects patients' quality of life, impacting their daily functioning, work capacity, and psychological well-being. In recent years, research has focused on identifying predictive factors for CRCI and developing risk prediction models to facilitate early intervention. This review summarizes the latest progress in CRCI risk prediction models, including traditional statistical approaches such as logistic regression and advanced machine learning techniques. While machine learning models demonstrate superior predictive performance, limitations such as data availability and model interpretability remain. Additionally, the review highlights key risk factors-such as age, cancer type, and treatment modalities-and evaluates the strengths and weaknesses of various predictive models in terms of accuracy, generalizability, and clinical applicability. Finally, this paper discusses the challenges in validating these models across diverse populations and the need for further research to enhance model reliability and personalization of interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":10337,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Medicine","volume":"25 1","pages":"74"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11885319/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10238-025-01590-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cancer-related cognitive impairment (CRCI) has emerged as a significant long-term complication in cancer survivors, particularly those undergoing chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or targeted therapies. Despite advances in treatment, CRCI affects patients' quality of life, impacting their daily functioning, work capacity, and psychological well-being. In recent years, research has focused on identifying predictive factors for CRCI and developing risk prediction models to facilitate early intervention. This review summarizes the latest progress in CRCI risk prediction models, including traditional statistical approaches such as logistic regression and advanced machine learning techniques. While machine learning models demonstrate superior predictive performance, limitations such as data availability and model interpretability remain. Additionally, the review highlights key risk factors-such as age, cancer type, and treatment modalities-and evaluates the strengths and weaknesses of various predictive models in terms of accuracy, generalizability, and clinical applicability. Finally, this paper discusses the challenges in validating these models across diverse populations and the need for further research to enhance model reliability and personalization of interventions.

癌症相关认知障碍风险预测模型研究进展
癌症相关认知障碍(CRCI)已成为癌症幸存者的重要长期并发症,特别是那些接受化疗、放疗或靶向治疗的患者。尽管治疗取得了进展,但CRCI仍会影响患者的生活质量,影响他们的日常功能、工作能力和心理健康。近年来,研究重点是识别CRCI的预测因素,建立风险预测模型,以便于早期干预。本文综述了CRCI风险预测模型的最新进展,包括传统的统计方法,如逻辑回归和先进的机器学习技术。虽然机器学习模型表现出卓越的预测性能,但数据可用性和模型可解释性等局限性仍然存在。此外,该综述强调了关键的风险因素,如年龄、癌症类型和治疗方式,并评估了各种预测模型在准确性、概括性和临床适用性方面的优缺点。最后,本文讨论了在不同人群中验证这些模型所面临的挑战,以及进一步研究以提高模型可靠性和干预措施个性化的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical and Experimental Medicine
Clinical and Experimental Medicine 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
2.20%
发文量
159
审稿时长
2.5 months
期刊介绍: Clinical and Experimental Medicine (CEM) is a multidisciplinary journal that aims to be a forum of scientific excellence and information exchange in relation to the basic and clinical features of the following fields: hematology, onco-hematology, oncology, virology, immunology, and rheumatology. The journal publishes reviews and editorials, experimental and preclinical studies, translational research, prospectively designed clinical trials, and epidemiological studies. Papers containing new clinical or experimental data that are likely to contribute to changes in clinical practice or the way in which a disease is thought about will be given priority due to their immediate importance. Case reports will be accepted on an exceptional basis only, and their submission is discouraged. The major criteria for publication are clarity, scientific soundness, and advances in knowledge. In compliance with the overwhelmingly prevailing request by the international scientific community, and with respect for eco-compatibility issues, CEM is now published exclusively online.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信