Improved protocols for isolation of Mycobacterium ulcerans from clinical samples.

IF 4 2区 生物学 Q2 MICROBIOLOGY
Bernadette Agbavor, Rejoice Agyeiwaa Arthur, Abigail Agbanyo, Dzifa Kofi Ahiatrogah, Charity Wiafe Akenten, Cynthia Adu-Asiamah, Kabiru Mohammed Abass, Elizabeth Ofori, George Amofa, Kwadwo Boampong, Thorsten Thye, Denise Dekker, Mathew Glover Addo, Mark Wansbrough-Jones, Tim John Bull, Yaw Ampem Amoako, Richard Odame Phillips
{"title":"Improved protocols for isolation of Mycobacterium ulcerans from clinical samples.","authors":"Bernadette Agbavor, Rejoice Agyeiwaa Arthur, Abigail Agbanyo, Dzifa Kofi Ahiatrogah, Charity Wiafe Akenten, Cynthia Adu-Asiamah, Kabiru Mohammed Abass, Elizabeth Ofori, George Amofa, Kwadwo Boampong, Thorsten Thye, Denise Dekker, Mathew Glover Addo, Mark Wansbrough-Jones, Tim John Bull, Yaw Ampem Amoako, Richard Odame Phillips","doi":"10.1186/s12866-025-03835-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The isolation and culture of Mycobacterium ulcerans (Mu) as a primary diagnostic modality for Buruli ulcer (BU) disease are limiting due to their low sensitivity and slow-growing nature. M. ulcerans cultures can also be overgrown with other bacteria and fungi. Culture, however, remains an important tool for the study of persisting viable M. ulcerans, drug susceptibility tests, and other molecular assays to improve management of the disease. The challenge of contamination with other fast-growing bacteria necessitates decontamination of clinical samples prior to culturing, but current methods may be too harsh, resulting in low yields of M. ulcerans. We aimed to evaluate a Tika-Kic decontamination process for M. ulcerans that uses supplements to stimulate M. ulcerans growth to improve recovery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Swab and Fine Needle Aspirate (FNA) samples were collected from 21 individuals with confirmed BU at baseline (week 0) and weeks 2 and 4 after initiating antibiotic treatment. Samples were decontaminated with Tika-Kic decontamination medium and the modified Petroff (NaOH) methods then inoculated each into Mycobacterium Growth Indicator Tube (MGIT) or Löwenstein Jensen (LJ) medium. Time to growth detection and confirmation by qPCR as well as the proportion of positive cultures for all three methods and the proportion of positive cultures for all three time points were documented. Common contaminating bacteria were also isolated and identified.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The proportion of M. ulcerans positive cultures obtained was higher for Tika-MGIT samples [14/43 (32%)] compared to Petroff-MGIT samples [10/43 (23%)] and Petroff-LJ samples [8/43 (19%)]. Baseline samples had a higher isolate proportion [17 (53%)] compared to samples collected after treatment initiation [9 (28%) for week 2 and 6 (19%) for week 4]. Contaminating bacteria isolated include Burkholderia cepacia, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Pasteurella pneumotropica, Proteus mirabilis, Morganella morganii, Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study shows an advantage for culturing Mycobacterium ulcerans from clinical samples using the Tika-Kic decontamination and growth medium. Further research is needed to refine sample processing to improve M. ulcerans recovery.</p>","PeriodicalId":9233,"journal":{"name":"BMC Microbiology","volume":"25 1","pages":"118"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11881482/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-025-03835-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The isolation and culture of Mycobacterium ulcerans (Mu) as a primary diagnostic modality for Buruli ulcer (BU) disease are limiting due to their low sensitivity and slow-growing nature. M. ulcerans cultures can also be overgrown with other bacteria and fungi. Culture, however, remains an important tool for the study of persisting viable M. ulcerans, drug susceptibility tests, and other molecular assays to improve management of the disease. The challenge of contamination with other fast-growing bacteria necessitates decontamination of clinical samples prior to culturing, but current methods may be too harsh, resulting in low yields of M. ulcerans. We aimed to evaluate a Tika-Kic decontamination process for M. ulcerans that uses supplements to stimulate M. ulcerans growth to improve recovery.

Methods: Swab and Fine Needle Aspirate (FNA) samples were collected from 21 individuals with confirmed BU at baseline (week 0) and weeks 2 and 4 after initiating antibiotic treatment. Samples were decontaminated with Tika-Kic decontamination medium and the modified Petroff (NaOH) methods then inoculated each into Mycobacterium Growth Indicator Tube (MGIT) or Löwenstein Jensen (LJ) medium. Time to growth detection and confirmation by qPCR as well as the proportion of positive cultures for all three methods and the proportion of positive cultures for all three time points were documented. Common contaminating bacteria were also isolated and identified.

Results: The proportion of M. ulcerans positive cultures obtained was higher for Tika-MGIT samples [14/43 (32%)] compared to Petroff-MGIT samples [10/43 (23%)] and Petroff-LJ samples [8/43 (19%)]. Baseline samples had a higher isolate proportion [17 (53%)] compared to samples collected after treatment initiation [9 (28%) for week 2 and 6 (19%) for week 4]. Contaminating bacteria isolated include Burkholderia cepacia, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Pasteurella pneumotropica, Proteus mirabilis, Morganella morganii, Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus.

Conclusion: Our study shows an advantage for culturing Mycobacterium ulcerans from clinical samples using the Tika-Kic decontamination and growth medium. Further research is needed to refine sample processing to improve M. ulcerans recovery.

从临床样本中分离溃疡分枝杆菌的改进方案。
背景:分离和培养溃疡分枝杆菌(Mu)作为布鲁里溃疡(BU)疾病的主要诊断方法由于其低敏感性和生长缓慢的性质而受到限制。溃疡分枝杆菌培养物也可能与其他细菌和真菌过度生长。然而,培养仍然是研究持续存活的溃疡分枝杆菌、药物敏感性试验和其他分子分析以改善疾病管理的重要工具。其他快速生长的细菌污染的挑战需要在培养前对临床样品进行净化,但目前的方法可能过于苛刻,导致溃疡分枝杆菌产量低。我们的目的是评估一个Tika-Kic去污过程溃疡分枝杆菌使用补充剂刺激溃疡分枝杆菌生长,以提高恢复。方法:在基线(第0周)和开始抗生素治疗后的第2周和第4周收集21例确诊布鲁里溃疡患者的拭子和细针抽吸(FNA)样本。样品分别用Tika-Kic去污培养基和改良的Petroff (NaOH)方法去污,分别接种于分枝杆菌生长指示管(MGIT)或Löwenstein Jensen (LJ)培养基中。记录了qPCR检测和确认生长所需的时间,以及三种方法的阳性培养比例和三个时间点的阳性培养比例。对常见的污染菌也进行了分离鉴定。结果:Tika-MGIT样品中溃疡分枝杆菌阳性培养比例[14/43(32%)]高于Petroff-MGIT样品[10/43(23%)]和Petroff-LJ样品[8/43(19%)]。基线样本的分离比例[17(53%)]高于治疗开始后收集的样本[第2周9(28%)和第4周6(19%)]。分离出的污染细菌包括洋葱伯克氏菌、铜绿假单胞菌、肺性巴氏菌、奇异变形杆菌、摩根氏菌、金黄色葡萄球菌和肠球菌。结论:我们的研究显示了使用Tika-Kic去污和生长培养基培养临床样本溃疡分枝杆菌的优势。需要进一步的研究来改进样品处理以提高溃疡分枝杆菌的回收率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Microbiology
BMC Microbiology 生物-微生物学
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
280
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: BMC Microbiology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on analytical and functional studies of prokaryotic and eukaryotic microorganisms, viruses and small parasites, as well as host and therapeutic responses to them and their interaction with the environment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信