Associations of patient knowledge with drug-modifiable cardiovascular risk factor control in coronary artery disease patients with and without diabetes mellitus: results from the cross-sectional KNOW-ABC study.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Maximilian Brockmeyer, Michaela Fell, Claudio Parco, Alexander Hoss, Kris G Vargas, Emilia Wies, Yingfeng Lin, Yvonne Heinen, Nadja Chernyak, Andrea Icks, Christian Jung, Malte Kelm, Georg Wolff
{"title":"Associations of patient knowledge with drug-modifiable cardiovascular risk factor control in coronary artery disease patients with and without diabetes mellitus: results from the cross-sectional KNOW-ABC study.","authors":"Maximilian Brockmeyer, Michaela Fell, Claudio Parco, Alexander Hoss, Kris G Vargas, Emilia Wies, Yingfeng Lin, Yvonne Heinen, Nadja Chernyak, Andrea Icks, Christian Jung, Malte Kelm, Georg Wolff","doi":"10.1186/s12872-025-04599-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Control of major drug-modifiable risk factors for glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), blood pressure (BP), and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) remains unsatisfactory in the secondary prevention of coronary artery disease (CAD). We aimed to analyze patient knowledge and attainment of LDL-C, BP, and HbA1c treatment goals and associated factors in German CAD patients with and without diabetes mellitus (DM).</p><p><strong>Methods/results: </strong>A total of 204 CAD patients (68 ± 8 years; 75.0% male; 84 with DM (41.2%)) completed a questionnaire assessing their knowledge of LDL-C (< 55 mg/dL), BP (age-adapted), and HbA1c (< 7.0%) treatment goals and levels of information on predefined CAD topics as well as associated factors, including CAD duration, adherence to pharmacotherapy, and physician monitoring of secondary prevention. LDL-C, BP, and HbA1c were measured. The mean duration of CAD was 9.8 ± 8 years. A total of 98.5% reported good adherence to pharmacotherapy. Measurements of LDL-C (81.4%) and HbA1c (71.4%) were predominantly performed by general practitioners. LDL-C goals were attained significantly better in patients with DM (39.3% with vs. 16.7% without DM, p < 0.01). The attainment of BP goals did not differ between patients with and without DM (71.4% vs. 72.5%, p = 0.87). HbA1c goals were attained by 48.8% of DM patients. LDL-C goals were known by 6.0% of patients with vs. 9.2% without DM (p = 0.44), and BP goals were known by 36.9% with vs. 30.0% without DM (p = 0.36). Knowledge of HbA1c goals was prevalent in 53.6% of DM patients. Subjective levels of information on CAD topics did not differ between patients with and without DM. Logistic regression revealed that DM (odds ratio (OR) 3.73, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.82-7.63) and knowledge of treatment goals were associated with LDL-C goal attainment (OR 3.84, CI 1.19-12.41); no such associations were identified for BP or HbA1c.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In German CAD patients with and without DM, a remarkable lack of knowledge and attainment of LDL-C treatment goals exists compared with BP and HbA1c. DM and knowledge of treatment goals were significantly associated with LDL-C treatment goal attainment. General practitioners rather than cardiologists or other specialties currently manage risk factor control.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>German Clinical Trials Register studyID DRKS00030703.</p>","PeriodicalId":9195,"journal":{"name":"BMC Cardiovascular Disorders","volume":"25 1","pages":"148"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11881313/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Cardiovascular Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-025-04599-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Control of major drug-modifiable risk factors for glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), blood pressure (BP), and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) remains unsatisfactory in the secondary prevention of coronary artery disease (CAD). We aimed to analyze patient knowledge and attainment of LDL-C, BP, and HbA1c treatment goals and associated factors in German CAD patients with and without diabetes mellitus (DM).

Methods/results: A total of 204 CAD patients (68 ± 8 years; 75.0% male; 84 with DM (41.2%)) completed a questionnaire assessing their knowledge of LDL-C (< 55 mg/dL), BP (age-adapted), and HbA1c (< 7.0%) treatment goals and levels of information on predefined CAD topics as well as associated factors, including CAD duration, adherence to pharmacotherapy, and physician monitoring of secondary prevention. LDL-C, BP, and HbA1c were measured. The mean duration of CAD was 9.8 ± 8 years. A total of 98.5% reported good adherence to pharmacotherapy. Measurements of LDL-C (81.4%) and HbA1c (71.4%) were predominantly performed by general practitioners. LDL-C goals were attained significantly better in patients with DM (39.3% with vs. 16.7% without DM, p < 0.01). The attainment of BP goals did not differ between patients with and without DM (71.4% vs. 72.5%, p = 0.87). HbA1c goals were attained by 48.8% of DM patients. LDL-C goals were known by 6.0% of patients with vs. 9.2% without DM (p = 0.44), and BP goals were known by 36.9% with vs. 30.0% without DM (p = 0.36). Knowledge of HbA1c goals was prevalent in 53.6% of DM patients. Subjective levels of information on CAD topics did not differ between patients with and without DM. Logistic regression revealed that DM (odds ratio (OR) 3.73, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.82-7.63) and knowledge of treatment goals were associated with LDL-C goal attainment (OR 3.84, CI 1.19-12.41); no such associations were identified for BP or HbA1c.

Conclusions: In German CAD patients with and without DM, a remarkable lack of knowledge and attainment of LDL-C treatment goals exists compared with BP and HbA1c. DM and knowledge of treatment goals were significantly associated with LDL-C treatment goal attainment. General practitioners rather than cardiologists or other specialties currently manage risk factor control.

Trial registration: German Clinical Trials Register studyID DRKS00030703.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
480
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: BMC Cardiovascular Disorders is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of disorders of the heart and circulatory system, as well as related molecular and cell biology, genetics, pathophysiology, epidemiology, and controlled trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信