Development of a Multidimensional, Multigroup Measure of Cognitive-Communication for Inpatient Rehabilitation.

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Julia Carpenter, Caitlin Deom, Andrew Bodine, Allen W Heinemann, Richard L Lieber, James Sliwa
{"title":"Development of a Multidimensional, Multigroup Measure of Cognitive-Communication for Inpatient Rehabilitation.","authors":"Julia Carpenter, Caitlin Deom, Andrew Bodine, Allen W Heinemann, Richard L Lieber, James Sliwa","doi":"10.1016/j.apmr.2025.02.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To develop a comprehensive, repeatable measure of cognitive-linguistic function for use in inpatient rehabilitation facility (IRF) settings using contemporary methods and to compare the sensitivity of this measure to the FIM cognitive items.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective analysis of clinician-reported assessment data collected as part of routine clinical operations.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Free-standing inpatient rehabilitation facility in the Midwestern United States.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>A convenience sample of 12,245 inpatients with motor speech, voice, aphasia and/or cognitive-communicative diagnoses, 18 years of age and older who were admitted to an IRF.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Standard of care rehabilitation services.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measure: </strong>Cognitive-Communication Ability Quotient (AQ) composed of 10 standard measures used by speech-language pathologists.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Confirmatory factor analysis resulted in good-fitting models (root-mean-square errors of approximation ≤0.08, comparative fit indices, and non-normed fit indices ≥0.95) for 5 groups defined by primary communication impairment (Aphasia, Cognitive-Communication Disorder, Brain Injury, Right Hemisphere Dysfunction, Motor Speech/Voice). Re-estimation as a multigroup, MIRT model yielded scores more sensitive to change compared to the FIM cognitive score. True score equating analysis demonstrated a higher ceiling and lower floor for the Cognitive-Communication AQ compared to the FIM.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We constructed 5 forms of a novel cognitive-communication measure, the Cognitive-Communication AQ, that demonstrates superior measurement characteristics compared to the FIM cognition score with a lower floor and higher ceiling. The AQ can detect changes in cognitive-communicative function that typically occur during an IRF stay. Repeated measurement during the IRF stay allows clinicians to monitor patients' progress and modify rehabilitation plans accordingly.</p>","PeriodicalId":8313,"journal":{"name":"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2025.02.007","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To develop a comprehensive, repeatable measure of cognitive-linguistic function for use in inpatient rehabilitation facility (IRF) settings using contemporary methods and to compare the sensitivity of this measure to the FIM cognitive items.

Design: Retrospective analysis of clinician-reported assessment data collected as part of routine clinical operations.

Setting: Free-standing inpatient rehabilitation facility in the Midwestern United States.

Participants: A convenience sample of 12,245 inpatients with motor speech, voice, aphasia and/or cognitive-communicative diagnoses, 18 years of age and older who were admitted to an IRF.

Interventions: Standard of care rehabilitation services.

Main outcome measure: Cognitive-Communication Ability Quotient (AQ) composed of 10 standard measures used by speech-language pathologists.

Results: Confirmatory factor analysis resulted in good-fitting models (root-mean-square errors of approximation ≤0.08, comparative fit indices, and non-normed fit indices ≥0.95) for 5 groups defined by primary communication impairment (Aphasia, Cognitive-Communication Disorder, Brain Injury, Right Hemisphere Dysfunction, Motor Speech/Voice). Re-estimation as a multigroup, MIRT model yielded scores more sensitive to change compared to the FIM cognitive score. True score equating analysis demonstrated a higher ceiling and lower floor for the Cognitive-Communication AQ compared to the FIM.

Conclusions: We constructed 5 forms of a novel cognitive-communication measure, the Cognitive-Communication AQ, that demonstrates superior measurement characteristics compared to the FIM cognition score with a lower floor and higher ceiling. The AQ can detect changes in cognitive-communicative function that typically occur during an IRF stay. Repeated measurement during the IRF stay allows clinicians to monitor patients' progress and modify rehabilitation plans accordingly.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
4.70%
发文量
495
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: The Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation publishes original, peer-reviewed research and clinical reports on important trends and developments in physical medicine and rehabilitation and related fields. This international journal brings researchers and clinicians authoritative information on the therapeutic utilization of physical, behavioral and pharmaceutical agents in providing comprehensive care for individuals with chronic illness and disabilities. Archives began publication in 1920, publishes monthly, and is the official journal of the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Its papers are cited more often than any other rehabilitation journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信