Ultrasound-Guided Serratus Anterior Plane Block Combined with Modified Parasternal Block in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Auricular Reconstruction Surgery Results in Superior Quality of Recovery Compared to a Standalone Serratus Anterior Plane Block.
Guihua Xiang, Chunmei Chen, Keyu Chen, Quanle Liu, Yue Wang, Bingqing Wang, Jin Qian, Yuan Chen, Dong Yang
{"title":"Ultrasound-Guided Serratus Anterior Plane Block Combined with Modified Parasternal Block in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Auricular Reconstruction Surgery Results in Superior Quality of Recovery Compared to a Standalone Serratus Anterior Plane Block.","authors":"Guihua Xiang, Chunmei Chen, Keyu Chen, Quanle Liu, Yue Wang, Bingqing Wang, Jin Qian, Yuan Chen, Dong Yang","doi":"10.1007/s00266-025-04731-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Serratus anterior plane block (SAPB) and parasternal block (PSB) are used in multimodal analgesia strategies to improve postoperative comfort and recovery. Their combined effectiveness for pediatric auricular reconstruction (AR) patients needs clarification.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A study was conducted on 100 children aged 8 to 12 undergoing autologous rib cartilage transplant in AR. Subjects were randomized into two groups: the ultrasound (US)-directed SAPB plus modified PSB group (SAPB+PSB group) and the US-guided SAPB alone group (SAPB group). The primary outcome was the 24 h postoperative Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) score. The secondary endpoints were pain scores, surgical field bleeding scores, sufentanil consumption within 24 h post-surgery, the time to first ambulation, and incidence of complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The SAPB+PSB group demonstrated significantly higher scores in physical comfort, emotional status, and pain aspects on the QoR-15 scale compared to the SAPB group, the difference was significant (P ≤ 0.001). No significant differences were observed between the groups in terms of psychological support and physical independence (P > 0.05). The total QoR-15 score was augmented among SAPB+PSB versus SAPB participants (P < 0.001). At 12 h, the SAPB+PSB group reported lower NRS scores than the SAPB group during rest (P < 0.001) and cough (P = 0.014). The sufentanil consumption at 24 h was substantially diminished among SAPB+PSB recipients (P < 0.001), and the time to first ambulation was shorter relative to the SAPB recipients, and the different was significant (P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>US-guided SAPB combined with modified PSB significantly enhances postoperative recovery quality in pediatric patients undergoing AR, effectively improving postoperative comfort and facilitating recovery.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence ii: </strong>This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .</p>","PeriodicalId":7609,"journal":{"name":"Aesthetic Plastic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aesthetic Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-025-04731-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Serratus anterior plane block (SAPB) and parasternal block (PSB) are used in multimodal analgesia strategies to improve postoperative comfort and recovery. Their combined effectiveness for pediatric auricular reconstruction (AR) patients needs clarification.
Methods: A study was conducted on 100 children aged 8 to 12 undergoing autologous rib cartilage transplant in AR. Subjects were randomized into two groups: the ultrasound (US)-directed SAPB plus modified PSB group (SAPB+PSB group) and the US-guided SAPB alone group (SAPB group). The primary outcome was the 24 h postoperative Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) score. The secondary endpoints were pain scores, surgical field bleeding scores, sufentanil consumption within 24 h post-surgery, the time to first ambulation, and incidence of complications.
Results: The SAPB+PSB group demonstrated significantly higher scores in physical comfort, emotional status, and pain aspects on the QoR-15 scale compared to the SAPB group, the difference was significant (P ≤ 0.001). No significant differences were observed between the groups in terms of psychological support and physical independence (P > 0.05). The total QoR-15 score was augmented among SAPB+PSB versus SAPB participants (P < 0.001). At 12 h, the SAPB+PSB group reported lower NRS scores than the SAPB group during rest (P < 0.001) and cough (P = 0.014). The sufentanil consumption at 24 h was substantially diminished among SAPB+PSB recipients (P < 0.001), and the time to first ambulation was shorter relative to the SAPB recipients, and the different was significant (P < 0.001).
Conclusion: US-guided SAPB combined with modified PSB significantly enhances postoperative recovery quality in pediatric patients undergoing AR, effectively improving postoperative comfort and facilitating recovery.
Level of evidence ii: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
期刊介绍:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery is a publication of the International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery and the official journal of the European Association of Societies of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery (EASAPS), Società Italiana di Chirurgia Plastica Ricostruttiva ed Estetica (SICPRE), Vereinigung der Deutschen Aesthetisch Plastischen Chirurgen (VDAPC), the Romanian Aesthetic Surgery Society (RASS), Asociación Española de Cirugía Estética Plástica (AECEP), La Sociedad Argentina de Cirugía Plástica, Estética y Reparadora (SACPER), the Rhinoplasty Society of Europe (RSE), the Iranian Society of Plastic and Aesthetic Surgeons (ISPAS), the Singapore Association of Plastic Surgeons (SAPS), the Australasian Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons (ASAPS), the Egyptian Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons (ESPRS), and the Sociedad Chilena de Cirugía Plástica, Reconstructiva y Estética (SCCP).
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery provides a forum for original articles advancing the art of aesthetic plastic surgery. Many describe surgical craftsmanship; others deal with complications in surgical procedures and methods by which to treat or avoid them. Coverage includes "second thoughts" on established techniques, which might be abandoned, modified, or improved. Also included are case histories; improvements in surgical instruments, pharmaceuticals, and operating room equipment; and discussions of problems such as the role of psychosocial factors in the doctor-patient and the patient-public interrelationships.
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery is covered in Current Contents/Clinical Medicine, SciSearch, Research Alert, Index Medicus-Medline, and Excerpta Medica/Embase.