A quiet convergence: The 2022 full-scale Russian invasion of Ukraine and Italian Parties' positions on the European Union

IF 2.2 3区 社会学 Q1 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
Andrea Capati, Federico Trastulli
{"title":"A quiet convergence: The 2022 full-scale Russian invasion of Ukraine and Italian Parties' positions on the European Union","authors":"Andrea Capati,&nbsp;Federico Trastulli","doi":"10.1111/1758-5899.13466","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We investigate the impact of the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine on domestic party competition over the European Union (EU) in its immediate aftermath, with a focus on the case of Italy. Drawing on a discursive neo-functionalist framework, we perform OLS regression analysis on a dataset of more than 10,000 Facebook posts retrieved via CrowdTangle. Our findings show that Italian parties converged towards supportive EU positions following the full-scale Russian invasion due to a decrease in anti-EU claims. Furthermore, the degree of convergence of individual parties varied depending on their ideological orientation. While extreme left-wing and green parties significantly decreased their discursive opposition to the EU, anti-Europeanism did not abate in radical right parties, which remained consistent in their Eurosceptic stances throughout the analysed timeframe. Compared to COVID-19, the different surrounding international context and policy fields involved in this crisis are associated with different party reactions vis-à-vis the EU.</p>","PeriodicalId":51510,"journal":{"name":"Global Policy","volume":"16 1","pages":"28-44"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1758-5899.13466","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1758-5899.13466","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We investigate the impact of the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine on domestic party competition over the European Union (EU) in its immediate aftermath, with a focus on the case of Italy. Drawing on a discursive neo-functionalist framework, we perform OLS regression analysis on a dataset of more than 10,000 Facebook posts retrieved via CrowdTangle. Our findings show that Italian parties converged towards supportive EU positions following the full-scale Russian invasion due to a decrease in anti-EU claims. Furthermore, the degree of convergence of individual parties varied depending on their ideological orientation. While extreme left-wing and green parties significantly decreased their discursive opposition to the EU, anti-Europeanism did not abate in radical right parties, which remained consistent in their Eurosceptic stances throughout the analysed timeframe. Compared to COVID-19, the different surrounding international context and policy fields involved in this crisis are associated with different party reactions vis-à-vis the EU.

悄悄趋同:2022年俄罗斯全面入侵乌克兰和意大利政党对欧盟的立场
我们调查了2022年俄罗斯入侵乌克兰对欧盟(EU)国内政党竞争的直接影响,并重点研究了意大利的情况。利用话语新功能主义框架,我们对通过CrowdTangle检索的10,000多个Facebook帖子的数据集进行OLS回归分析。我们的研究结果表明,在俄罗斯全面入侵之后,由于反欧盟主张的减少,意大利政党倾向于支持欧盟的立场。此外,个别政党的趋同程度因其意识形态取向而异。虽然极端左翼和绿党明显减少了对欧盟的话语反对,但反欧洲主义在激进右翼政党中并没有减弱,在整个分析时间框架内,他们的欧洲怀疑立场始终如一。与新冠疫情相比,此次危机所涉及的不同周边国际背景和政策领域与各方对-à-vis欧盟的不同反应有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Policy
Global Policy Multiple-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
10.50%
发文量
125
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信