Outsourcing Strategy Selection of Original Brand Manufacturers in the Fashion Industry Under the Influence of Brand Spillover

IF 2.5 3区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS
Bing Jiang, Zhou Fang
{"title":"Outsourcing Strategy Selection of Original Brand Manufacturers in the Fashion Industry Under the Influence of Brand Spillover","authors":"Bing Jiang,&nbsp;Zhou Fang","doi":"10.1002/mde.4454","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Outsourcing strategy plays an essential role in manufacturing production. Compared to traditional manufacturing industries, brand spillover behavior from contract manufacturers is more prominent in the fashion industry's outsourcing practices. Therefore, we have developed a model for original brand manufacturers (OBM) to choose an outsourcing strategy under the influence of various factors: OBM can outsource production to a competing manufacturer (CM), a non-competing manufacturer (NCM), or produce internally. If CM is the only contractor for OBM, it will enhance its brand power through brand spillover. If NCM is the only contractor for OBM, there are quality control issues. In summary, we consider three outsourcing strategies for the OBM: outsourcing production to CM, outsourcing to NCM, or establishing internal production, which correspond to strategies C, N, and F, respectively. We find that the brand spillover has a greater impact on OBM than expected. It affects OBM's production planning by influencing market demand, resulting in the profit of strategy C always being lower than strategy N. This forces OBM to face quality control issues. On this basis, we discuss blockchain technology that enables OBM to address quality control issues while dealing with brand spillovers. Interestingly, blockchain technology does not always bring benefits and can only solve problems under specific conditions. In addition, we also prove that the dual-source strategy, that is, OBM outsources production to CM and NCM simultaneously, is better than the C and N strategies, but whether it is better than the F strategies depends on the investment cost.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":18186,"journal":{"name":"Managerial and Decision Economics","volume":"46 3","pages":"1571-1583"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Managerial and Decision Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mde.4454","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Outsourcing strategy plays an essential role in manufacturing production. Compared to traditional manufacturing industries, brand spillover behavior from contract manufacturers is more prominent in the fashion industry's outsourcing practices. Therefore, we have developed a model for original brand manufacturers (OBM) to choose an outsourcing strategy under the influence of various factors: OBM can outsource production to a competing manufacturer (CM), a non-competing manufacturer (NCM), or produce internally. If CM is the only contractor for OBM, it will enhance its brand power through brand spillover. If NCM is the only contractor for OBM, there are quality control issues. In summary, we consider three outsourcing strategies for the OBM: outsourcing production to CM, outsourcing to NCM, or establishing internal production, which correspond to strategies C, N, and F, respectively. We find that the brand spillover has a greater impact on OBM than expected. It affects OBM's production planning by influencing market demand, resulting in the profit of strategy C always being lower than strategy N. This forces OBM to face quality control issues. On this basis, we discuss blockchain technology that enables OBM to address quality control issues while dealing with brand spillovers. Interestingly, blockchain technology does not always bring benefits and can only solve problems under specific conditions. In addition, we also prove that the dual-source strategy, that is, OBM outsources production to CM and NCM simultaneously, is better than the C and N strategies, but whether it is better than the F strategies depends on the investment cost.

品牌外溢影响下服装行业原创品牌厂商外包策略选择
外包战略在制造业生产中起着至关重要的作用。与传统制造业相比,代工企业的品牌溢出行为在时尚产业外包实践中更为突出。因此,我们建立了一个原始品牌制造商(OBM)在各种因素影响下选择外包策略的模型:OBM可以将生产外包给竞争制造商(CM)、非竞争制造商(NCM),也可以在内部生产。如果CM是OBM的唯一承包商,它将通过品牌溢出来增强其品牌力。如果NCM是OBM的唯一承包商,则存在质量控制问题。总之,我们考虑了OBM的三种外包策略:将生产外包给CM,外包给NCM,或者建立内部生产,它们分别对应于策略C, N和F。我们发现,品牌溢出对OBM的影响大于预期。它通过影响市场需求来影响OBM的生产计划,导致策略C的利润总是低于策略n。这迫使OBM面临质量控制问题。在此基础上,我们讨论了区块链技术,使OBM能够在处理品牌溢出的同时解决质量控制问题。有趣的是,区块链技术并不总是带来好处,只能解决特定条件下的问题。此外,我们还证明了双源策略,即OBM将生产同时外包给CM和NCM,优于C和N策略,但是否优于F策略取决于投资成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
18.20%
发文量
242
期刊介绍: Managerial and Decision Economics will publish articles applying economic reasoning to managerial decision-making and management strategy.Management strategy concerns practical decisions that managers face about how to compete, how to succeed, and how to organize to achieve their goals. Economic thinking and analysis provides a critical foundation for strategic decision-making across a variety of dimensions. For example, economic insights may help in determining which activities to outsource and which to perfom internally. They can help unravel questions regarding what drives performance differences among firms and what allows these differences to persist. They can contribute to an appreciation of how industries, organizations, and capabilities evolve.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信