Investigating the perceptions of self-efficacy of in-field and out-of-field home economics teachers

IF 1.3 Q3 FAMILY STUDIES
Donna Pendergast, Sarah McManus, Anna Du Plessis, Jay Deagon
{"title":"Investigating the perceptions of self-efficacy of in-field and out-of-field home economics teachers","authors":"Donna Pendergast,&nbsp;Sarah McManus,&nbsp;Anna Du Plessis,&nbsp;Jay Deagon","doi":"10.1111/fcsr.70006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Out-of-field teaching is a strategy employed to address global teacher shortages. This study compares Australian in-field and out-of-field teacher effectiveness perceptions when teaching home economics. An online survey (<i>N</i> = 194) identified statistically significant findings that negatively impact the subject, teachers, and students: in-field teachers report they are more effective than out-of-field teachers, while out-of-field teachers claim they are equally effective; in-field and out-of-field teachers report declines in self-efficacy and well-being when teaching out-of-field; out-of-field teachers use narrower subject skills, safety, and knowledge. Professional learning, skill development, resource provision, support/mentoring, planning time, and strategic hiring are suggested to address out-of-field teaching challenges.</p>","PeriodicalId":46383,"journal":{"name":"Family & Consumer Sciences Research Journal","volume":"53 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/fcsr.70006","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family & Consumer Sciences Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/fcsr.70006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Out-of-field teaching is a strategy employed to address global teacher shortages. This study compares Australian in-field and out-of-field teacher effectiveness perceptions when teaching home economics. An online survey (N = 194) identified statistically significant findings that negatively impact the subject, teachers, and students: in-field teachers report they are more effective than out-of-field teachers, while out-of-field teachers claim they are equally effective; in-field and out-of-field teachers report declines in self-efficacy and well-being when teaching out-of-field; out-of-field teachers use narrower subject skills, safety, and knowledge. Professional learning, skill development, resource provision, support/mentoring, planning time, and strategic hiring are suggested to address out-of-field teaching challenges.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
28.60%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: Publishing original research and scholarly reviews in areas of family and consumer sciences and related disciplines, Family & Consumer Sciences Research Journal is concerned with the general well-being of families and individuals, including such areas as child and family studies; clothing and textiles; consumer sciences education; family economics and management; food and nutrition; and housing, equipment, and design.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信