Benjamin Laffitte, Tao Zhou, Zhihan Yang, Philippe Ciais, Jinshi Jian, Ni Huang, Barnabas C. Seyler, Xiangjun Pei, Xiaolu Tang
{"title":"Timescale Matters: Finer Temporal Resolution Influences Driver Contributions to Global Soil Respiration","authors":"Benjamin Laffitte, Tao Zhou, Zhihan Yang, Philippe Ciais, Jinshi Jian, Ni Huang, Barnabas C. Seyler, Xiangjun Pei, Xiaolu Tang","doi":"10.1111/gcb.70118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Understanding the dynamics of soil respiration (<i>R</i><sub>s</sub>) and its environmental drivers is crucial for accurately modeling terrestrial carbon fluxes. However, current methodologies often lead to divergent estimates and rely on annual predictions that may overlook critical interactions occurring at seasonal scales. A critical knowledge gap lies in understanding how temporal resolution affects both <i>R</i><sub>s</sub> predictions and their environmental drivers. Here, we employ deep learning models to predict global <i>R</i><sub>s</sub> at monthly (MRM) and annual (ARM) scales from 1982 to 2018. We then consider three main drivers potentially affecting <i>R</i><sub>s</sub>, including temperature, precipitation, and a vegetation proxy (leaf area index; LAI). Our models demonstrate strong predictive capabilities with global <i>R</i><sub>s</sub> estimation of 79.4 ± 5.7 Pg C year<sup>−1</sup> for the MRM and 78.3 ± 7.5 Pg C year<sup>−1</sup> for ARM (mean ± SD). While the difference in global estimations between both models is small, there are notable disparities in the spatial contribution of dominant drivers. The MRM highlights an influence of both temperature and LAI, while the ARM emphasizes a dominant role of precipitation. These findings underscore the critical role of temporal resolution in capturing seasonal variations and identifying key <i>R</i><sub>s</sub>-environment relationships that annual models may obscure. High temporal resolution <i>R</i><sub>s</sub> predictions, such as those provided by the MRM, are essential for capturing nuanced seasonal interactions between <i>R</i><sub>s</sub> and its drivers, refining carbon flux models, detecting critical seasonal thresholds, and enhancing the reliability of future Earth system predictions. This work highlights the need for further research into monthly and seasonal <i>R</i><sub>s</sub> variations, as well as higher timescale resolutions, to advance our understanding of ecosystem carbon dynamics in a rapidly changing climate.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":175,"journal":{"name":"Global Change Biology","volume":"31 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Change Biology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gcb.70118","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Understanding the dynamics of soil respiration (Rs) and its environmental drivers is crucial for accurately modeling terrestrial carbon fluxes. However, current methodologies often lead to divergent estimates and rely on annual predictions that may overlook critical interactions occurring at seasonal scales. A critical knowledge gap lies in understanding how temporal resolution affects both Rs predictions and their environmental drivers. Here, we employ deep learning models to predict global Rs at monthly (MRM) and annual (ARM) scales from 1982 to 2018. We then consider three main drivers potentially affecting Rs, including temperature, precipitation, and a vegetation proxy (leaf area index; LAI). Our models demonstrate strong predictive capabilities with global Rs estimation of 79.4 ± 5.7 Pg C year−1 for the MRM and 78.3 ± 7.5 Pg C year−1 for ARM (mean ± SD). While the difference in global estimations between both models is small, there are notable disparities in the spatial contribution of dominant drivers. The MRM highlights an influence of both temperature and LAI, while the ARM emphasizes a dominant role of precipitation. These findings underscore the critical role of temporal resolution in capturing seasonal variations and identifying key Rs-environment relationships that annual models may obscure. High temporal resolution Rs predictions, such as those provided by the MRM, are essential for capturing nuanced seasonal interactions between Rs and its drivers, refining carbon flux models, detecting critical seasonal thresholds, and enhancing the reliability of future Earth system predictions. This work highlights the need for further research into monthly and seasonal Rs variations, as well as higher timescale resolutions, to advance our understanding of ecosystem carbon dynamics in a rapidly changing climate.
期刊介绍:
Global Change Biology is an environmental change journal committed to shaping the future and addressing the world's most pressing challenges, including sustainability, climate change, environmental protection, food and water safety, and global health.
Dedicated to fostering a profound understanding of the impacts of global change on biological systems and offering innovative solutions, the journal publishes a diverse range of content, including primary research articles, technical advances, research reviews, reports, opinions, perspectives, commentaries, and letters. Starting with the 2024 volume, Global Change Biology will transition to an online-only format, enhancing accessibility and contributing to the evolution of scholarly communication.