Do Decision Support Tools Allow Farmers to be Better Advised on Nitrogen Fertilisation in Wheat—Rapeseed Crops Succession in Northern France?

IF 3.7 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY
M.- A. Bouchard, A. L. H. Andriamandroso, A. Siah, C. Waterlot, B. Vandoorne, K. S. Andrianarisoa
{"title":"Do Decision Support Tools Allow Farmers to be Better Advised on Nitrogen Fertilisation in Wheat—Rapeseed Crops Succession in Northern France?","authors":"M.- A. Bouchard,&nbsp;A. L. H. Andriamandroso,&nbsp;A. Siah,&nbsp;C. Waterlot,&nbsp;B. Vandoorne,&nbsp;K. S. Andrianarisoa","doi":"10.1111/jac.70032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>The use of sensor- or model-based decision support tools (DSTs) is encouraged to manage crop nitrogen (N) fertilisation, but studies evaluating the obtained advice at the crop succession scale are lacking. The aim of this work was to compare the agronomic performance between the advice obtained by DSTs and that obtained by the reference balance sheet method (BSM) regarding the N fertiliser dose and to evaluate the consequences for soil mineral N (SMN) dynamics. In this investigation, we studied winter wheat/rapeseed/winter wheat crop succession at two experimental sites in northern France according to a randomised block design with four replications. Microplots receiving N fertiliser doses determined by two sensor-based techniques (proximal sensing or PS and remote sensing with a UAV or RS-U) and one model-based DST (dynamic balance model or DBM) were compared to those receiving N fertiliser doses determined by the BSM and to the unfertilised control (T0) plot. In 67% of the studied cases, the N fertiliser dose determined by DSTs was higher than that determined by the BSM, without significant increases in the grain yield and quality: DBM (five out of six cases) &gt; PS (four out of six cases) &gt; RS-U (three out of six cases). The difference in the recommended N fertiliser dose between the DSTs and BSM ranged from −29 to +80 kg N ha<sup>−1</sup>. The surplus of applied N was underutilised by crops, particularly during dry years, leading to overfertilisation. In our experimental condition, beyond an overfertilisation value of 42 kg N ha<sup>−1</sup>, a positive relationship was observed between the excess of SMN observed at harvest (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.39***) and the overfertilisation. Our results indicated high variability of the recommended N fertiliser dose depending on the chosen DSTs, eventually inducing overfertilisation and excess SMN at harvest without significant changes in the grain yield and quality. We consider that improving the analysis of plant or soil N status evolution whilst considering weather parameters in DSTs should improve the accuracy of the provided N fertilisation advice.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":14864,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science","volume":"211 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jac.70032","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The use of sensor- or model-based decision support tools (DSTs) is encouraged to manage crop nitrogen (N) fertilisation, but studies evaluating the obtained advice at the crop succession scale are lacking. The aim of this work was to compare the agronomic performance between the advice obtained by DSTs and that obtained by the reference balance sheet method (BSM) regarding the N fertiliser dose and to evaluate the consequences for soil mineral N (SMN) dynamics. In this investigation, we studied winter wheat/rapeseed/winter wheat crop succession at two experimental sites in northern France according to a randomised block design with four replications. Microplots receiving N fertiliser doses determined by two sensor-based techniques (proximal sensing or PS and remote sensing with a UAV or RS-U) and one model-based DST (dynamic balance model or DBM) were compared to those receiving N fertiliser doses determined by the BSM and to the unfertilised control (T0) plot. In 67% of the studied cases, the N fertiliser dose determined by DSTs was higher than that determined by the BSM, without significant increases in the grain yield and quality: DBM (five out of six cases) > PS (four out of six cases) > RS-U (three out of six cases). The difference in the recommended N fertiliser dose between the DSTs and BSM ranged from −29 to +80 kg N ha−1. The surplus of applied N was underutilised by crops, particularly during dry years, leading to overfertilisation. In our experimental condition, beyond an overfertilisation value of 42 kg N ha−1, a positive relationship was observed between the excess of SMN observed at harvest (R2 = 0.39***) and the overfertilisation. Our results indicated high variability of the recommended N fertiliser dose depending on the chosen DSTs, eventually inducing overfertilisation and excess SMN at harvest without significant changes in the grain yield and quality. We consider that improving the analysis of plant or soil N status evolution whilst considering weather parameters in DSTs should improve the accuracy of the provided N fertilisation advice.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science
Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
54
审稿时长
7.8 months
期刊介绍: The effects of stress on crop production of agricultural cultivated plants will grow to paramount importance in the 21st century, and the Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science aims to assist in understanding these challenges. In this context, stress refers to extreme conditions under which crops and forages grow. The journal publishes original papers and reviews on the general and special science of abiotic plant stress. Specific topics include: drought, including water-use efficiency, such as salinity, alkaline and acidic stress, extreme temperatures since heat, cold and chilling stress limit the cultivation of crops, flooding and oxidative stress, and means of restricting them. Special attention is on research which have the topic of narrowing the yield gap. The Journal will give preference to field research and studies on plant stress highlighting these subsections. Particular regard is given to application-oriented basic research and applied research. The application of the scientific principles of agricultural crop experimentation is an essential prerequisite for the publication. Studies based on field experiments must show that they have been repeated (at least three times) on the same organism or have been conducted on several different varieties.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信