M.- A. Bouchard, A. L. H. Andriamandroso, A. Siah, C. Waterlot, B. Vandoorne, K. S. Andrianarisoa
{"title":"Do Decision Support Tools Allow Farmers to be Better Advised on Nitrogen Fertilisation in Wheat—Rapeseed Crops Succession in Northern France?","authors":"M.- A. Bouchard, A. L. H. Andriamandroso, A. Siah, C. Waterlot, B. Vandoorne, K. S. Andrianarisoa","doi":"10.1111/jac.70032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>The use of sensor- or model-based decision support tools (DSTs) is encouraged to manage crop nitrogen (N) fertilisation, but studies evaluating the obtained advice at the crop succession scale are lacking. The aim of this work was to compare the agronomic performance between the advice obtained by DSTs and that obtained by the reference balance sheet method (BSM) regarding the N fertiliser dose and to evaluate the consequences for soil mineral N (SMN) dynamics. In this investigation, we studied winter wheat/rapeseed/winter wheat crop succession at two experimental sites in northern France according to a randomised block design with four replications. Microplots receiving N fertiliser doses determined by two sensor-based techniques (proximal sensing or PS and remote sensing with a UAV or RS-U) and one model-based DST (dynamic balance model or DBM) were compared to those receiving N fertiliser doses determined by the BSM and to the unfertilised control (T0) plot. In 67% of the studied cases, the N fertiliser dose determined by DSTs was higher than that determined by the BSM, without significant increases in the grain yield and quality: DBM (five out of six cases) > PS (four out of six cases) > RS-U (three out of six cases). The difference in the recommended N fertiliser dose between the DSTs and BSM ranged from −29 to +80 kg N ha<sup>−1</sup>. The surplus of applied N was underutilised by crops, particularly during dry years, leading to overfertilisation. In our experimental condition, beyond an overfertilisation value of 42 kg N ha<sup>−1</sup>, a positive relationship was observed between the excess of SMN observed at harvest (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.39***) and the overfertilisation. Our results indicated high variability of the recommended N fertiliser dose depending on the chosen DSTs, eventually inducing overfertilisation and excess SMN at harvest without significant changes in the grain yield and quality. We consider that improving the analysis of plant or soil N status evolution whilst considering weather parameters in DSTs should improve the accuracy of the provided N fertilisation advice.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":14864,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science","volume":"211 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jac.70032","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The use of sensor- or model-based decision support tools (DSTs) is encouraged to manage crop nitrogen (N) fertilisation, but studies evaluating the obtained advice at the crop succession scale are lacking. The aim of this work was to compare the agronomic performance between the advice obtained by DSTs and that obtained by the reference balance sheet method (BSM) regarding the N fertiliser dose and to evaluate the consequences for soil mineral N (SMN) dynamics. In this investigation, we studied winter wheat/rapeseed/winter wheat crop succession at two experimental sites in northern France according to a randomised block design with four replications. Microplots receiving N fertiliser doses determined by two sensor-based techniques (proximal sensing or PS and remote sensing with a UAV or RS-U) and one model-based DST (dynamic balance model or DBM) were compared to those receiving N fertiliser doses determined by the BSM and to the unfertilised control (T0) plot. In 67% of the studied cases, the N fertiliser dose determined by DSTs was higher than that determined by the BSM, without significant increases in the grain yield and quality: DBM (five out of six cases) > PS (four out of six cases) > RS-U (three out of six cases). The difference in the recommended N fertiliser dose between the DSTs and BSM ranged from −29 to +80 kg N ha−1. The surplus of applied N was underutilised by crops, particularly during dry years, leading to overfertilisation. In our experimental condition, beyond an overfertilisation value of 42 kg N ha−1, a positive relationship was observed between the excess of SMN observed at harvest (R2 = 0.39***) and the overfertilisation. Our results indicated high variability of the recommended N fertiliser dose depending on the chosen DSTs, eventually inducing overfertilisation and excess SMN at harvest without significant changes in the grain yield and quality. We consider that improving the analysis of plant or soil N status evolution whilst considering weather parameters in DSTs should improve the accuracy of the provided N fertilisation advice.
人们鼓励使用基于传感器或模型的决策支持工具(DSTs)来管理作物氮肥,但是缺乏在作物演替尺度上评估所获得建议的研究。这项工作的目的是比较DSTs和参考资产负债表法(BSM)在氮肥剂量方面的农艺表现,并评估对土壤矿质氮(SMN)动态的影响。本研究采用随机区组设计,采用4个重复,在法国北部的两个试验点研究了冬小麦/油菜籽/冬小麦作物演替。通过两种基于传感器的技术(近端传感或PS和无人机或RS-U遥感)和一种基于模型的DST(动态平衡模型或DBM)确定氮肥剂量的微型地块与接受BSM确定的氮肥剂量的地块和未施肥的对照(T0)地块进行比较。在67%的研究案例中,DSTs确定的氮肥剂量高于BSM确定的氮肥剂量,对粮食产量和品质没有显著提高:DBM(6例中有5例)>; PS(6例中有4例)> RS-U(6例中有3例)。DSTs和BSM在推荐施氮量上的差异为- 29 ~ +80 kg N ha - 1。作物未充分利用施用的剩余氮,特别是在干旱年份,导致过度施肥。在我们的实验条件下,超过42 kg N ha - 1的过度施肥值,收获时观察到的SMN过量与过度施肥呈正相关(R2 = 0.39***)。我们的研究结果表明,根据所选择的DSTs,推荐的氮肥剂量具有很高的可变性,最终导致收获时过度施肥和过量的SMN,而粮食产量和质量却没有显著变化。我们认为,在考虑DSTs中天气参数的同时,改进对植物或土壤氮状态演变的分析应提高所提供的氮肥建议的准确性。
期刊介绍:
The effects of stress on crop production of agricultural cultivated plants will grow to paramount importance in the 21st century, and the Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science aims to assist in understanding these challenges. In this context, stress refers to extreme conditions under which crops and forages grow. The journal publishes original papers and reviews on the general and special science of abiotic plant stress. Specific topics include: drought, including water-use efficiency, such as salinity, alkaline and acidic stress, extreme temperatures since heat, cold and chilling stress limit the cultivation of crops, flooding and oxidative stress, and means of restricting them. Special attention is on research which have the topic of narrowing the yield gap. The Journal will give preference to field research and studies on plant stress highlighting these subsections. Particular regard is given to application-oriented basic research and applied research. The application of the scientific principles of agricultural crop experimentation is an essential prerequisite for the publication. Studies based on field experiments must show that they have been repeated (at least three times) on the same organism or have been conducted on several different varieties.