{"title":"Bacterial Colonization of Silver-Additive Ventilator Circuit in Patients Receiving Mechanical Ventilation: A Randomized Controlled Trial","authors":"Ke-Yun Chao, Wei-Lun Liu, Chao-Yu Chen, Chia-Hui Su, Shih-Hsing Yang, Yu-Tzu Huang","doi":"10.1111/crj.70058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Mechanical ventilation is a significant risk factor for developing ventilator-associated pneumonia. Although silver-coated endotracheal tubes have been shown to reduce the bacterial burden, the efficacy of silver-based ion additive ventilator circuits in reducing bacterial colonization remains unclear.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This single-site, randomized controlled trial compared the incidence of bacterial contamination between a silver-additive ventilator circuit and a ventilator circuit that did not have a silver additive. Bacterial samples were collected from the inspiratory limb and Y-adaptor of the circuit and analyzed using culture and identification methods.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Bacterial growth was observed in all samples from the control group and in 93.7% and 81.2% of inspiratory limb and Y-adaptor samples, respectively, from the study group. The colony counts in the inspiratory limb samples were significantly different between the groups, with a higher proportion of undesirable colony counts in the control group compared with the study group. No significant difference between the groups was observed in the colony counts in the Y-adaptor samples.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The use of a silver-additive ventilator circuit may reduce bacterial circuit colonization. However, further research with larger sample sizes and more diverse patient populations is necessary to confirm these findings.</p>\n \n <p><b>Trial Registration:</b> ClinicalTrial.gov: NCT04927806</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55247,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Respiratory Journal","volume":"19 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/crj.70058","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Respiratory Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/crj.70058","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
Mechanical ventilation is a significant risk factor for developing ventilator-associated pneumonia. Although silver-coated endotracheal tubes have been shown to reduce the bacterial burden, the efficacy of silver-based ion additive ventilator circuits in reducing bacterial colonization remains unclear.
Methods
This single-site, randomized controlled trial compared the incidence of bacterial contamination between a silver-additive ventilator circuit and a ventilator circuit that did not have a silver additive. Bacterial samples were collected from the inspiratory limb and Y-adaptor of the circuit and analyzed using culture and identification methods.
Results
Bacterial growth was observed in all samples from the control group and in 93.7% and 81.2% of inspiratory limb and Y-adaptor samples, respectively, from the study group. The colony counts in the inspiratory limb samples were significantly different between the groups, with a higher proportion of undesirable colony counts in the control group compared with the study group. No significant difference between the groups was observed in the colony counts in the Y-adaptor samples.
Conclusion
The use of a silver-additive ventilator circuit may reduce bacterial circuit colonization. However, further research with larger sample sizes and more diverse patient populations is necessary to confirm these findings.
期刊介绍:
Overview
Effective with the 2016 volume, this journal will be published in an online-only format.
Aims and Scope
The Clinical Respiratory Journal (CRJ) provides a forum for clinical research in all areas of respiratory medicine from clinical lung disease to basic research relevant to the clinic.
We publish original research, review articles, case studies, editorials and book reviews in all areas of clinical lung disease including:
Asthma
Allergy
COPD
Non-invasive ventilation
Sleep related breathing disorders
Interstitial lung diseases
Lung cancer
Clinical genetics
Rhinitis
Airway and lung infection
Epidemiology
Pediatrics
CRJ provides a fast-track service for selected Phase II and Phase III trial studies.
Keywords
Clinical Respiratory Journal, respiratory, pulmonary, medicine, clinical, lung disease,
Abstracting and Indexing Information
Academic Search (EBSCO Publishing)
Academic Search Alumni Edition (EBSCO Publishing)
Embase (Elsevier)
Health & Medical Collection (ProQuest)
Health Research Premium Collection (ProQuest)
HEED: Health Economic Evaluations Database (Wiley-Blackwell)
Hospital Premium Collection (ProQuest)
Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition (Clarivate Analytics)
MEDLINE/PubMed (NLM)
ProQuest Central (ProQuest)
Science Citation Index Expanded (Clarivate Analytics)
SCOPUS (Elsevier)