Evaluation of environmental footprint: Life Cycle Assessment of Laboratory-scale thermal and chemical processes used for materials extraction from waste silicon solar panels

IF 6.3 2区 材料科学 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS
Chitra Sulkan , Prashant Kumar Thakur , Rebecca Yang , Sushil Kumar , Vivian WY. Tam , Cuong Tran
{"title":"Evaluation of environmental footprint: Life Cycle Assessment of Laboratory-scale thermal and chemical processes used for materials extraction from waste silicon solar panels","authors":"Chitra Sulkan ,&nbsp;Prashant Kumar Thakur ,&nbsp;Rebecca Yang ,&nbsp;Sushil Kumar ,&nbsp;Vivian WY. Tam ,&nbsp;Cuong Tran","doi":"10.1016/j.solmat.2025.113556","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study explores recycling methods for recovering valuable components from discarded silicon solar panels, focusing on high-temperature thermal treatment and chemical processing with toluene as a solvent. The environmental impacts of these methods were comprehensively investigated using a detailed Life Cycle Assessment (LCA). During thermal treatment, emissions were analyzed by adsorbing them onto quartz filter paper. XRF, TGA-DTG, and FT-IR analyses confirmed the presence of emitted elements, including Si, C, O, B, Na, Mg, Ca, K, P, S, Cl, and Fe, some of which could pose environmental and health risks. The LCA results revealed significant environmental trade-offs between the two approaches. The chemical method demonstrated superior material recovery and solvent management capabilities but had a higher carbon footprint and fossil fuel potential (5.42kg-eq) compared to thermal treatment (0.235kg-eq). Thermal treatment showed lower impacts on climate change, fossil fuel potential, water consumption, ecotoxicity, human toxicity, and particulate matter production but had more pronounced effects on ozone depletion and land use. Choosing between methods depends on specific environmental priorities. To achieve sustainable disposal and material recovery of solar panels, broader considerations including carbon emissions, resource utilization, and waste management strategies are crucial. This study provides insights to promote environmentally responsible practices in solar panel recycling.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":429,"journal":{"name":"Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells","volume":"285 ","pages":"Article 113556"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0927024825001576","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study explores recycling methods for recovering valuable components from discarded silicon solar panels, focusing on high-temperature thermal treatment and chemical processing with toluene as a solvent. The environmental impacts of these methods were comprehensively investigated using a detailed Life Cycle Assessment (LCA). During thermal treatment, emissions were analyzed by adsorbing them onto quartz filter paper. XRF, TGA-DTG, and FT-IR analyses confirmed the presence of emitted elements, including Si, C, O, B, Na, Mg, Ca, K, P, S, Cl, and Fe, some of which could pose environmental and health risks. The LCA results revealed significant environmental trade-offs between the two approaches. The chemical method demonstrated superior material recovery and solvent management capabilities but had a higher carbon footprint and fossil fuel potential (5.42kg-eq) compared to thermal treatment (0.235kg-eq). Thermal treatment showed lower impacts on climate change, fossil fuel potential, water consumption, ecotoxicity, human toxicity, and particulate matter production but had more pronounced effects on ozone depletion and land use. Choosing between methods depends on specific environmental priorities. To achieve sustainable disposal and material recovery of solar panels, broader considerations including carbon emissions, resource utilization, and waste management strategies are crucial. This study provides insights to promote environmentally responsible practices in solar panel recycling.

Abstract Image

环境足迹评估:从废硅太阳能电池板中提取材料的实验室规模热和化学过程的生命周期评估
本研究探索了从废弃硅太阳能电池板中回收有价值组件的回收方法,重点是高温热处理和以甲苯为溶剂的化学处理。使用详细的生命周期评估(LCA)对这些方法的环境影响进行了全面调查。在热处理过程中,通过将排放物吸附在石英滤纸上来分析排放物。XRF、tg - dtg和FT-IR分析证实了发射元素的存在,包括Si、C、O、B、Na、Mg、Ca、K、P、S、Cl和Fe,其中一些可能构成环境和健康风险。LCA结果揭示了两种方法之间的重大环境权衡。化学方法显示出优越的材料回收和溶剂管理能力,但与热处理(0.235kg-eq)相比,其碳足迹和化石燃料潜力(5.42kg-eq)更高。热处理对气候变化、化石燃料潜力、水消耗、生态毒性、人体毒性和颗粒物产生的影响较小,但对臭氧消耗和土地利用的影响更为显著。选择不同的方法取决于具体的环境优先事项。为了实现太阳能电池板的可持续处置和材料回收,包括碳排放、资源利用和废物管理战略在内的更广泛的考虑至关重要。该研究为促进太阳能电池板回收的环保实践提供了见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells
Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells 工程技术-材料科学:综合
CiteScore
12.60
自引率
11.60%
发文量
513
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: Solar Energy Materials & Solar Cells is intended as a vehicle for the dissemination of research results on materials science and technology related to photovoltaic, photothermal and photoelectrochemical solar energy conversion. Materials science is taken in the broadest possible sense and encompasses physics, chemistry, optics, materials fabrication and analysis for all types of materials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信