Environmental policy and distance to firms: An analysis of publicly listed firms in China

IF 13.6 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Kingsley Dogah , Shang Jiang , Casto Martín Montero Kuscevic , King Yoong Lim
{"title":"Environmental policy and distance to firms: An analysis of publicly listed firms in China","authors":"Kingsley Dogah ,&nbsp;Shang Jiang ,&nbsp;Casto Martín Montero Kuscevic ,&nbsp;King Yoong Lim","doi":"10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108330","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Focusing on the seven regions with pilot emission trading scheme (ETS) in China, we develop a novel theory explaining firms’ environmental investment (EI) decision, which is endogenous to the spatial effects associated with waste-recycling facility (WRF) proximity and ETS induced peer-to-peer learning. A novel feature is that, due to the use of resource inputs, firms incur both recyclable and carbon-intensive waste disposal costs. This leads to two empirically testable propositions and a conjecture, which we evaluate based on cross-sectional analyses of 1717 public listed firms in China during the 2015–20 periods. We find WRF proximity to correlate positively with observed EI take-up, and this is subsequently associated with higher labor productivity. However, ETS-infused peer learning effect has the opposite effect in that proximity to an investing neighbor results seems to be associated with freeriding, especially when the difference in internal margins between firms is accounted for. While there are overall positive spatial spillover effects, this results in policy rivalry (between the two policies), where the freeriding effect not only results in a lack of ETS policy effect onto labor productivity of even the 219 EI firms, but also mitigates the positive WRF proximity effect.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11665,"journal":{"name":"Energy Economics","volume":"144 ","pages":"Article 108330"},"PeriodicalIF":13.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988325001549","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Focusing on the seven regions with pilot emission trading scheme (ETS) in China, we develop a novel theory explaining firms’ environmental investment (EI) decision, which is endogenous to the spatial effects associated with waste-recycling facility (WRF) proximity and ETS induced peer-to-peer learning. A novel feature is that, due to the use of resource inputs, firms incur both recyclable and carbon-intensive waste disposal costs. This leads to two empirically testable propositions and a conjecture, which we evaluate based on cross-sectional analyses of 1717 public listed firms in China during the 2015–20 periods. We find WRF proximity to correlate positively with observed EI take-up, and this is subsequently associated with higher labor productivity. However, ETS-infused peer learning effect has the opposite effect in that proximity to an investing neighbor results seems to be associated with freeriding, especially when the difference in internal margins between firms is accounted for. While there are overall positive spatial spillover effects, this results in policy rivalry (between the two policies), where the freeriding effect not only results in a lack of ETS policy effect onto labor productivity of even the 219 EI firms, but also mitigates the positive WRF proximity effect.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy Economics
Energy Economics ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
18.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
524
期刊介绍: Energy Economics is a field journal that focuses on energy economics and energy finance. It covers various themes including the exploitation, conversion, and use of energy, markets for energy commodities and derivatives, regulation and taxation, forecasting, environment and climate, international trade, development, and monetary policy. The journal welcomes contributions that utilize diverse methods such as experiments, surveys, econometrics, decomposition, simulation models, equilibrium models, optimization models, and analytical models. It publishes a combination of papers employing different methods to explore a wide range of topics. The journal's replication policy encourages the submission of replication studies, wherein researchers reproduce and extend the key results of original studies while explaining any differences. Energy Economics is indexed and abstracted in several databases including Environmental Abstracts, Fuel and Energy Abstracts, Social Sciences Citation Index, GEOBASE, Social & Behavioral Sciences, Journal of Economic Literature, INSPEC, and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信