Sensorimotor Stabilization Exercises With and Without Behavioral Treatment in Low Back Pain: Feasibility and Effects of a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

IF 1.9 Q2 REHABILITATION

Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation Pub Date : 2025-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.arrct.2025.100430

Tilman Engel PhD , Daniel Niederer PhD , Adamantios Arampatzis PhD , Winfried Banzer MD , Heidrun Beck MD , Philipp Floessel MA , Thore Haag PhD , Steffen Mueller PhD , Marcus Schiltenwolf MD , Hendrik Schmidt PhD , Christian Schneider MD , Dirk Stengel MD , Josefine Stoll PhD , Pia-Maria Wippert PhD , Frank Mayer MD

{"title":"Sensorimotor Stabilization Exercises With and Without Behavioral Treatment in Low Back Pain: Feasibility and Effects of a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial","authors":"Tilman Engel PhD , Daniel Niederer PhD , Adamantios Arampatzis PhD , Winfried Banzer MD , Heidrun Beck MD , Philipp Floessel MA , Thore Haag PhD , Steffen Mueller PhD , Marcus Schiltenwolf MD , Hendrik Schmidt PhD , Christian Schneider MD , Dirk Stengel MD , Josefine Stoll PhD , Pia-Maria Wippert PhD , Frank Mayer MD","doi":"10.1016/j.arrct.2025.100430","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To investigate the feasibility and effects of a sensorimotor stabilization exercise intervention with and without behavioral treatment in nonspecific low back pain.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>A three-armed multicenter randomized controlled trial.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>Five study sites across Germany (3 orthopedic university outpatient clinics, 1 university sports medicine department, and 1 clinical institution).</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>Six hundred and sixty-two volunteers (N=662) (59% females, age 39±13y) with low back pain.</div></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><div>Sensorimotor training (SMT), sensorimotor training with behavioral therapy (SMT+BT), and usual care group (UCG; continuation of the already ongoing individual treatment regime). Intervention groups performed a 12-week (3wk center-based, 9wk home-based) program.</div></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measures</h3><div>Adherence, dropout rates, adverse events, and intervention effects on pain intensity, disability, and trunk torque (gain scores, repeated measures analysis of variance, α-level<0.05).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In total, 220 participants received SMT, 222 received SMT+BT, and 170 were analyzed as UCG. Dropout rates were 10% for SMT and SMT+BT at week 3, 31% and 30% at week 4, and 49% and 50% at week 12. Adherence rates above 80% were reached in both interventions; 134 adverse events occurred. Intervention effects compared to UCG were found for pain intensity (SMT, <em>P</em>=.011, effect size d=0.41), disability (SMT+BT, <em>P</em>=.020, d=0.41), and peak torque (SMT, <em>P</em>=.045, d=0.38; SMT+BT, <em>P</em>=.019, d=0.44), with overall small effect sizes.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Participants were highly adherent to the sensorimotor exercise, but showed increased dropout rates, particularly during home-based training. Both interventions proved to be feasible, and although only SMT showed an increased effect on pain intensity compared to UCG, the SMT+BT showed positive effects on disability. Both interventions led to increases in strength, indicative of a neuromuscular adaptation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72291,"journal":{"name":"Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation","volume":"7 1","pages":"Article 100430"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590109525000059","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

To investigate the feasibility and effects of a sensorimotor stabilization exercise intervention with and without behavioral treatment in nonspecific low back pain.

Design

A three-armed multicenter randomized controlled trial.

Setting

Five study sites across Germany (3 orthopedic university outpatient clinics, 1 university sports medicine department, and 1 clinical institution).

Participants

Six hundred and sixty-two volunteers (N=662) (59% females, age 39±13y) with low back pain.

Interventions

Sensorimotor training (SMT), sensorimotor training with behavioral therapy (SMT+BT), and usual care group (UCG; continuation of the already ongoing individual treatment regime). Intervention groups performed a 12-week (3wk center-based, 9wk home-based) program.

Main Outcome Measures

Adherence, dropout rates, adverse events, and intervention effects on pain intensity, disability, and trunk torque (gain scores, repeated measures analysis of variance, α-level<0.05).

Results

In total, 220 participants received SMT, 222 received SMT+BT, and 170 were analyzed as UCG. Dropout rates were 10% for SMT and SMT+BT at week 3, 31% and 30% at week 4, and 49% and 50% at week 12. Adherence rates above 80% were reached in both interventions; 134 adverse events occurred. Intervention effects compared to UCG were found for pain intensity (SMT, P=.011, effect size d=0.41), disability (SMT+BT, P=.020, d=0.41), and peak torque (SMT, P=.045, d=0.38; SMT+BT, P=.019, d=0.44), with overall small effect sizes.

Conclusions

Participants were highly adherent to the sensorimotor exercise, but showed increased dropout rates, particularly during home-based training. Both interventions proved to be feasible, and although only SMT showed an increased effect on pain intensity compared to UCG, the SMT+BT showed positive effects on disability. Both interventions led to increases in strength, indicative of a neuromuscular adaptation.

查看原文本刊更多论文

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊