Test-Retest Reliability and Minimal Detectable Change of Body Function Impairment and Activity Limitation Outcomes Using a Mechatronic Evaluation Designed for Inpatient Stroke Research

IF 2 Q2 REHABILITATION
Jane E. Gyarmaty DPT , Francesca S. Abiusi DPT , Natalie B. Hoffman DPT , Reem E. Ibrahim BA , Emily R. Linne DPT , Sanjana Matta DPT , Carli R. Nissen DPT , Maya A. Sankaran DPT , Alexandrea M. Smith DPT , Ana Maria Acosta PhD , Michael D. Ellis DPT
{"title":"Test-Retest Reliability and Minimal Detectable Change of Body Function Impairment and Activity Limitation Outcomes Using a Mechatronic Evaluation Designed for Inpatient Stroke Research","authors":"Jane E. Gyarmaty DPT ,&nbsp;Francesca S. Abiusi DPT ,&nbsp;Natalie B. Hoffman DPT ,&nbsp;Reem E. Ibrahim BA ,&nbsp;Emily R. Linne DPT ,&nbsp;Sanjana Matta DPT ,&nbsp;Carli R. Nissen DPT ,&nbsp;Maya A. Sankaran DPT ,&nbsp;Alexandrea M. Smith DPT ,&nbsp;Ana Maria Acosta PhD ,&nbsp;Michael D. Ellis DPT","doi":"10.1016/j.arrct.2024.100385","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To determine the test-retest reliability and minimal detectable change (MDC) scores for 7 precision measures examining upper extremity strength, reaching ability, and the expression of flexion synergy after stroke. The measurements relied on a mechatronic evaluation designed for time efficiency facilitating implementation in inpatient translational research.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Observational, analytical, cross-sectional study.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>University research laboratory.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>Twenty-five participants (N=25) &gt;6 months poststroke with persistent upper extremity body function impairment and activity limitation were recruited using convenience sampling.</div></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><div>Not applicable.</div></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measures</h3><div>Shoulder abduction and elbow extension strength measured as a unit of torque (Nm); normalized reaching distance with the arm under 3 conditions: supported, against gravity, and against 50% of shoulder abduction strength; flexion synergy takeover; and emergence thresholds.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Twelve male and 13 female participants aged 56.4 ± 17.8 years with a mean time poststroke of 5.37 ± 7.55 years completed the study. The intraclass correlation coefficients for the outcome measures were as follows: shoulder abduction strength (0.963), elbow extension strength (0.983), supported reaching (0.982), reaching against gravity (0.968), reaching against 50% abduction strength (0.974), flexion synergy takeover (0.919), and flexion synergy emergence (0.949) thresholds. The MDC, overall mean, and standard deviation were calculated as follows: shoulder abduction strength (5.69 Nm, 24.44±10.67 Nm), elbow extension strength (5.66 Nm, 18.53±15.66 Nm), supported reaching (0.07, 0.91±0.20), reaching against gravity (0.15, 0.73±0.30), reaching against 50% abduction strength (0.13, 0.69±0.29), flexion synergy takeover (0.14, 0.91±0.17), and flexion synergy emergence (0.17, 0.56±0.27) thresholds.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The mechatronic evaluation, although streamlined from more labor-intensive laboratory evaluations, demonstrates excellent (&gt;0.90) test-retest reliability and MDC scores for 7 precision measures of upper extremity body function impairment (weakness and synergy) and activity limitation (reaching).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72291,"journal":{"name":"Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation","volume":"7 1","pages":"Article 100385"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590109524000983","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To determine the test-retest reliability and minimal detectable change (MDC) scores for 7 precision measures examining upper extremity strength, reaching ability, and the expression of flexion synergy after stroke. The measurements relied on a mechatronic evaluation designed for time efficiency facilitating implementation in inpatient translational research.

Design

Observational, analytical, cross-sectional study.

Setting

University research laboratory.

Participants

Twenty-five participants (N=25) >6 months poststroke with persistent upper extremity body function impairment and activity limitation were recruited using convenience sampling.

Interventions

Not applicable.

Main Outcome Measures

Shoulder abduction and elbow extension strength measured as a unit of torque (Nm); normalized reaching distance with the arm under 3 conditions: supported, against gravity, and against 50% of shoulder abduction strength; flexion synergy takeover; and emergence thresholds.

Results

Twelve male and 13 female participants aged 56.4 ± 17.8 years with a mean time poststroke of 5.37 ± 7.55 years completed the study. The intraclass correlation coefficients for the outcome measures were as follows: shoulder abduction strength (0.963), elbow extension strength (0.983), supported reaching (0.982), reaching against gravity (0.968), reaching against 50% abduction strength (0.974), flexion synergy takeover (0.919), and flexion synergy emergence (0.949) thresholds. The MDC, overall mean, and standard deviation were calculated as follows: shoulder abduction strength (5.69 Nm, 24.44±10.67 Nm), elbow extension strength (5.66 Nm, 18.53±15.66 Nm), supported reaching (0.07, 0.91±0.20), reaching against gravity (0.15, 0.73±0.30), reaching against 50% abduction strength (0.13, 0.69±0.29), flexion synergy takeover (0.14, 0.91±0.17), and flexion synergy emergence (0.17, 0.56±0.27) thresholds.

Conclusions

The mechatronic evaluation, although streamlined from more labor-intensive laboratory evaluations, demonstrates excellent (>0.90) test-retest reliability and MDC scores for 7 precision measures of upper extremity body function impairment (weakness and synergy) and activity limitation (reaching).
使用专为住院脑卒中研究设计的机电一体化评估的身体功能损伤和活动限制结果的重测信度和最小可检测变化
目的探讨脑卒中后上肢力量、伸够能力、屈曲协同表达等7项精密指标的重测信度和最小可检测变化(MDC)评分。测量依赖于为时间效率而设计的机电一体化评估,便于在住院转化研究中实施。设计观察性、分析性、横断面研究。大学研究实验室。采用方便抽样方法招募卒中后6个月伴有持续性上肢身体功能障碍和活动受限的参与者25例(N=25)。InterventionsNot适用。主要观察指标:以扭矩为单位测量肩外展和肘关节伸展强度(Nm);在3种情况下与手臂的正常接触距离:支撑,重力,50%肩外展力量;Flexion协同收购;以及出现阈值。结果男性12例,女性13例,年龄56.4±17.8岁,平均脑卒中后时间5.37±7.55年。结果测量的类内相关系数如下:肩外展强度(0.963)、肘部外展强度(0.983)、支撑达到(0.982)、抗重力达到(0.968)、抗50%外展强度达到(0.974)、屈曲协同接管(0.919)和屈曲协同出现(0.949)阈值。MDC、总平均值和标准差计算如下:肩部外展强度(5.69 Nm, 24.44±10.67 Nm)、肘部外展强度(5.66 Nm, 18.53±15.66 Nm)、支撑达到(0.07,0.91±0.20)、达到重力(0.15,0.73±0.30)、达到50%外展强度(0.13,0.69±0.29)、屈曲协同接管(0.14,0.91±0.17)和屈曲协同出现(0.17,0.56±0.27)阈值。结论机电一体化评估虽然从劳动密集型的实验室评估中简化出来,但在上肢身体功能障碍(无力和协同)和活动限制(伸展)的7项精确测量中显示出优异的重测信度和MDC分数(>0.90)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信