Nathaniel Garcia , Ashley Lytch , Emily Cramer PhD , William R. Black PhD , Jordan T. Jones DO
{"title":"Prevalence of Pain and Effect of Joint Strength on Perceived Physical Function in Pediatric Patients With Ehlers–Danlos Syndrome","authors":"Nathaniel Garcia , Ashley Lytch , Emily Cramer PhD , William R. Black PhD , Jordan T. Jones DO","doi":"10.1016/j.arrct.2024.100416","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To identify how pediatric patients with hypermobile-type Ehlers–Danlos syndrome (hEDS) present to physical therapy (PT) and better understand their musculoskeletal dysfunction.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Patients were included in the study if they had a diagnosis of hEDS and at least 1 completed PT evaluation after diagnosis. A chart review was conducted to assess joint strength and pain characteristics at the initial PT assessment. Physical Function Mobility (PF-Mobility; 4 domains with 1-5 scale with higher score representative of better physical function) as part of the Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System and pain intensity score (visual analog scale, 0-10 scale where a lower number indicates less pain) was completed by participants.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>Midwestern tertiary care center.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>Sixty-nine participants were included in the study with an average age of 16.4 years (SD 2.8) at the initial PT visit and 96% were female individuals.</div></div><div><h3>Intervention</h3><div>Not applicable.</div></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measures</h3><div>Joint strength, pain intensity and location, and PF-Mobility.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The knee was the most reported location with pain (68%) followed by the shoulder (46%), hip (41%), and back (39%). Average pain intensity was 5.0 (SD 1.8), joint strength scores ranged from 8.2 (SD 0.9) to 9.9 (SD 0.4), and the PF-Mobility mean was 3.3 (SD 0.6). No correlation was noted between joint pain intensity and strength at the joint.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Although the participants perceived poor mobility and significant pain, PT-assessed strength did not reveal significant muscle weakness. Additional work is needed to explore this discrepancy, including altered biomechanics, evaluation methods, and nonmusculoskeletal factors such as neuropathic and psychological components.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72291,"journal":{"name":"Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation","volume":"7 1","pages":"Article 100416"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590109524001290","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
To identify how pediatric patients with hypermobile-type Ehlers–Danlos syndrome (hEDS) present to physical therapy (PT) and better understand their musculoskeletal dysfunction.
Design
Patients were included in the study if they had a diagnosis of hEDS and at least 1 completed PT evaluation after diagnosis. A chart review was conducted to assess joint strength and pain characteristics at the initial PT assessment. Physical Function Mobility (PF-Mobility; 4 domains with 1-5 scale with higher score representative of better physical function) as part of the Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System and pain intensity score (visual analog scale, 0-10 scale where a lower number indicates less pain) was completed by participants.
Setting
Midwestern tertiary care center.
Participants
Sixty-nine participants were included in the study with an average age of 16.4 years (SD 2.8) at the initial PT visit and 96% were female individuals.
Intervention
Not applicable.
Main Outcome Measures
Joint strength, pain intensity and location, and PF-Mobility.
Results
The knee was the most reported location with pain (68%) followed by the shoulder (46%), hip (41%), and back (39%). Average pain intensity was 5.0 (SD 1.8), joint strength scores ranged from 8.2 (SD 0.9) to 9.9 (SD 0.4), and the PF-Mobility mean was 3.3 (SD 0.6). No correlation was noted between joint pain intensity and strength at the joint.
Conclusions
Although the participants perceived poor mobility and significant pain, PT-assessed strength did not reveal significant muscle weakness. Additional work is needed to explore this discrepancy, including altered biomechanics, evaluation methods, and nonmusculoskeletal factors such as neuropathic and psychological components.