Characteristics of environmental efficiency for different types of contaminated sites in China

IF 7.1 3区 材料科学 Q1 GREEN & SUSTAINABLE SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Xiufeng Ni , Chao Jiang , Fangming Jiang , Huan Luo , Yu Diao , Fan Jiang , Qingyu Zhang , Jinnan Wang
{"title":"Characteristics of environmental efficiency for different types of contaminated sites in China","authors":"Xiufeng Ni ,&nbsp;Chao Jiang ,&nbsp;Fangming Jiang ,&nbsp;Huan Luo ,&nbsp;Yu Diao ,&nbsp;Fan Jiang ,&nbsp;Qingyu Zhang ,&nbsp;Jinnan Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.mtsust.2025.101092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The assessment of the environmental efficiency of contaminated sites is important to address funding issues and ensure the sustainability of redevelopment in remediation and risk control actions. This study aims to gauge the environmental efficiency of remediation and risk control (EERRC) levels in China. It utilizes the super-efficiency directional distance function and metafrontier model to estimate metafrontier and group frontier EERRC across 408 contaminated sites spanning 27 provincial administrative regions. These sites were categorized based on economic development levels and industry types. This study dissects inefficiency factors into technological gaps and managerial inefficiencies while also analyzing the impact of site categorical attributes and the correlation between remediation and risk control strategies and EERRC. Findings indicate that China's overall EERRC average under the metafrontier stands at 0.524, contrasting with 0.902 under the group frontier, showcasing crucial technological gaps among regions and industries. Notably, industries such as metal smelting and processing, energy processing and supply, and textile and tanning exhibit low EERRC owing to their high technological complexity and compound contamination of heavy metals and semi-volatile organic compounds. Regions with low economic development are advised to prioritize more effective risk control measures over indiscriminate remediation efforts. Moreover, this study suggests that repurposing contaminated sites for uses such as storage land or sensitive land (e.g., residential or public administration and service) in terms of land planning. The EERRC assessment is instrumental in formulating cleanup and redevelopment strategies tailored to diverse types of contaminated sites.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18322,"journal":{"name":"Materials Today Sustainability","volume":"30 ","pages":"Article 101092"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Materials Today Sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589234725000211","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GREEN & SUSTAINABLE SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The assessment of the environmental efficiency of contaminated sites is important to address funding issues and ensure the sustainability of redevelopment in remediation and risk control actions. This study aims to gauge the environmental efficiency of remediation and risk control (EERRC) levels in China. It utilizes the super-efficiency directional distance function and metafrontier model to estimate metafrontier and group frontier EERRC across 408 contaminated sites spanning 27 provincial administrative regions. These sites were categorized based on economic development levels and industry types. This study dissects inefficiency factors into technological gaps and managerial inefficiencies while also analyzing the impact of site categorical attributes and the correlation between remediation and risk control strategies and EERRC. Findings indicate that China's overall EERRC average under the metafrontier stands at 0.524, contrasting with 0.902 under the group frontier, showcasing crucial technological gaps among regions and industries. Notably, industries such as metal smelting and processing, energy processing and supply, and textile and tanning exhibit low EERRC owing to their high technological complexity and compound contamination of heavy metals and semi-volatile organic compounds. Regions with low economic development are advised to prioritize more effective risk control measures over indiscriminate remediation efforts. Moreover, this study suggests that repurposing contaminated sites for uses such as storage land or sensitive land (e.g., residential or public administration and service) in terms of land planning. The EERRC assessment is instrumental in formulating cleanup and redevelopment strategies tailored to diverse types of contaminated sites.

Abstract Image

中国不同类型污染场地的环境效益特征
评估受污染土地的环境效益,对解决资金问题和确保在修复和风险控制行动中持续进行重建十分重要。本研究旨在评估中国生态环境修复与风险控制的环境效率水平。利用超效率定向距离函数和超前沿模型估算了27个省级行政区408个污染场地的超前沿和群前沿EERRC。这些地点是根据经济发展水平和产业类型进行分类的。本研究将低效率因素分解为技术差距和管理效率低下,并分析了场地分类属性的影响以及修复和风险控制策略与EERRC的相关性。结果表明,中国整体EERRC均值在元边界下为0.524,而在群边界下为0.902,显示出地区和行业之间的重大技术差距。值得注意的是,诸如金属冶炼和加工、能源加工和供应、纺织和制革等工业由于其技术复杂性高以及重金属和半挥发性有机化合物的复合污染,其EERRC较低。建议经济发展水平较低的地区优先采取更有效的风险控制措施,而不是无差别的补救措施。此外,本研究建议在土地规划方面,将受污染的土地重新用作储存用地或敏感土地(例如住宅或公共行政和服务)。EERRC的评估有助于制定针对不同类型污染场地的清理和重建战略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
6.40%
发文量
174
审稿时长
32 days
期刊介绍: Materials Today Sustainability is a multi-disciplinary journal covering all aspects of sustainability through materials science. With a rapidly increasing population with growing demands, materials science has emerged as a critical discipline toward protecting of the environment and ensuring the long term survival of future generations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信