Characterizing draft animal logging operations in the southeastern United States

IF 2.7 Q1 FORESTRY
Lucas P. Hales , Justin L. Hart , Patrick Hiesl , Matthew C. LaFevor , Ian M. Snider
{"title":"Characterizing draft animal logging operations in the southeastern United States","authors":"Lucas P. Hales ,&nbsp;Justin L. Hart ,&nbsp;Patrick Hiesl ,&nbsp;Matthew C. LaFevor ,&nbsp;Ian M. Snider","doi":"10.1016/j.tfp.2025.100824","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Conventional forest management has become largely inaccessible for most family forest landowners in the southeastern United States because of growing incongruencies between the small tract sizes of family forests and the tract size requirements of mechanized logging firms. Compared to conventional mechanized logging, draft animal logging has relatively minimal costs and ecological impacts, making it an appealing candidate to fill the small-parcel ecological forest management niche. However, little is known about the current status of the practice in the southeastern US. We investigated the prevalence of draft animal logging in eight Southeastern states and elucidated demographic and operational characteristics of its practitioners with a survey, evaluating the ability of the current network of draft animal loggers to meet forest management needs. Findings indicate that the practice has potential as a small-parcel forest management option, but current opportunities are limited by the small number of draft animal loggers operating in the region.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36104,"journal":{"name":"Trees, Forests and People","volume":"20 ","pages":"Article 100824"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trees, Forests and People","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666719325000500","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Conventional forest management has become largely inaccessible for most family forest landowners in the southeastern United States because of growing incongruencies between the small tract sizes of family forests and the tract size requirements of mechanized logging firms. Compared to conventional mechanized logging, draft animal logging has relatively minimal costs and ecological impacts, making it an appealing candidate to fill the small-parcel ecological forest management niche. However, little is known about the current status of the practice in the southeastern US. We investigated the prevalence of draft animal logging in eight Southeastern states and elucidated demographic and operational characteristics of its practitioners with a survey, evaluating the ability of the current network of draft animal loggers to meet forest management needs. Findings indicate that the practice has potential as a small-parcel forest management option, but current opportunities are limited by the small number of draft animal loggers operating in the region.
美国东南部动物采伐的特征
由于家庭森林面积小与机械化采伐公司对面积的要求越来越不一致,美国东南部大多数家庭森林土地所有者基本上无法进行传统的森林管理。与传统的机械化采伐相比,动物采伐的成本和生态影响相对较小,是填补小块森林生态管理生态位的理想选择。然而,人们对这种做法在美国东南部的现状知之甚少。我们调查了东南部8个州的动物采伐的流行程度,并通过调查阐明了其从业人员的人口统计学和业务特征,评估了当前动物采伐网络满足森林管理需求的能力。调查结果表明,这种做法有潜力作为小块森林管理的一种选择,但目前的机会受到该地区役畜伐木工人数量少的限制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Trees, Forests and People
Trees, Forests and People Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
7.40%
发文量
172
审稿时长
56 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信