Enhancing access to neutering services for dogs and cats in a Brazilian city with a large animal population

IF 2.2 2区 农林科学 Q1 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Marcelo Teixeira Paiva , Lorena Diniz Macedo Silva Maia , Fernanda do Carmo Magalhães , Maria Helena Franco Morais , Rafael Romero Nicolino , Danielle Ferreira de Magalhães Soares , Camila Stefanie Fonseca de Oliveira
{"title":"Enhancing access to neutering services for dogs and cats in a Brazilian city with a large animal population","authors":"Marcelo Teixeira Paiva ,&nbsp;Lorena Diniz Macedo Silva Maia ,&nbsp;Fernanda do Carmo Magalhães ,&nbsp;Maria Helena Franco Morais ,&nbsp;Rafael Romero Nicolino ,&nbsp;Danielle Ferreira de Magalhães Soares ,&nbsp;Camila Stefanie Fonseca de Oliveira","doi":"10.1016/j.prevetmed.2025.106491","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In One Health context, ensuring animal access to veterinary services is crucial. Unfortunately, many communities lack such services, highlighting the need for subsidized options. Our study aimed to evaluate free access to the Canine and Feline Surgical Neutering Service in Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil, a city with a large animal population. We also sought to propose actions for enhancing access and develop evaluation indicators. To assess individual access, we employed a logistic model, using service scheduling data from 2012 to 2018. Regional access was evaluated through the Three-Step Floating Catchment Area (3SFCA) method, incorporating data on neutering availability and estimated animal population by Coverage Area for 2012, 2015, and 2018. Our findings indicated that male animal owners were more likely to drop out compared to those with female dogs. Waiting time emerged as a significant obstacle, with an odds ratio of 1.2 per month of waiting, as well as the Health Vulnerability Index (HVI) of the Coverage Area. Although areas of higher vulnerability faced a greater risk of dropouts, we observed \"resistance\" in these areas, suggesting lower access to private veterinary services for tutors. The spatial access index demonstrated that most areas had a supply capacity exceeding more than 5 %. However, a general reduction in the index occurred in 2018, owing to disproportionate population growth relative to service availability between 2015 and 2018. There was a gradual reduction in inequality in spatial access between areas with different levels of vulnerability, however, areas of very high vulnerability presented significantly lower access than others. Based on our results, we recommend adopting policies that prioritize areas with higher vulnerability, focusing on differentiated supply and waiting time to enhance access. Additionally, identifying the capacity to offer private veterinary services and gathering detailed information on the population dynamics of dogs and cats in the municipality would facilitate a more accurate application of the 3SFCA method in planning neutering services offered by the subsidized veterinary service in Belo Horizonte.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20413,"journal":{"name":"Preventive veterinary medicine","volume":"239 ","pages":"Article 106491"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Preventive veterinary medicine","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167587725000765","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In One Health context, ensuring animal access to veterinary services is crucial. Unfortunately, many communities lack such services, highlighting the need for subsidized options. Our study aimed to evaluate free access to the Canine and Feline Surgical Neutering Service in Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil, a city with a large animal population. We also sought to propose actions for enhancing access and develop evaluation indicators. To assess individual access, we employed a logistic model, using service scheduling data from 2012 to 2018. Regional access was evaluated through the Three-Step Floating Catchment Area (3SFCA) method, incorporating data on neutering availability and estimated animal population by Coverage Area for 2012, 2015, and 2018. Our findings indicated that male animal owners were more likely to drop out compared to those with female dogs. Waiting time emerged as a significant obstacle, with an odds ratio of 1.2 per month of waiting, as well as the Health Vulnerability Index (HVI) of the Coverage Area. Although areas of higher vulnerability faced a greater risk of dropouts, we observed "resistance" in these areas, suggesting lower access to private veterinary services for tutors. The spatial access index demonstrated that most areas had a supply capacity exceeding more than 5 %. However, a general reduction in the index occurred in 2018, owing to disproportionate population growth relative to service availability between 2015 and 2018. There was a gradual reduction in inequality in spatial access between areas with different levels of vulnerability, however, areas of very high vulnerability presented significantly lower access than others. Based on our results, we recommend adopting policies that prioritize areas with higher vulnerability, focusing on differentiated supply and waiting time to enhance access. Additionally, identifying the capacity to offer private veterinary services and gathering detailed information on the population dynamics of dogs and cats in the municipality would facilitate a more accurate application of the 3SFCA method in planning neutering services offered by the subsidized veterinary service in Belo Horizonte.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Preventive veterinary medicine
Preventive veterinary medicine 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
184
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Preventive Veterinary Medicine is one of the leading international resources for scientific reports on animal health programs and preventive veterinary medicine. The journal follows the guidelines for standardizing and strengthening the reporting of biomedical research which are available from the CONSORT, MOOSE, PRISMA, REFLECT, STARD, and STROBE statements. The journal focuses on: Epidemiology of health events relevant to domestic and wild animals; Economic impacts of epidemic and endemic animal and zoonotic diseases; Latest methods and approaches in veterinary epidemiology; Disease and infection control or eradication measures; The "One Health" concept and the relationships between veterinary medicine, human health, animal-production systems, and the environment; Development of new techniques in surveillance systems and diagnosis; Evaluation and control of diseases in animal populations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信