Handling practices and microbiological assessment of wooden and plastic cutting boards in domestic kitchens

IF 6 1区 农林科学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Janaina Prieto de Oliveira , Dionice Capistrano da Silva , Leonardo Ereno Tadielo , Emanoelli Aparecida Rodrigues dos Santos , Evelyn Cristine da Silva , Aryele Nunes da Cruz Encide Sampaio , Fábio Sossai Possebon , Juliano Gonçalves Pereira
{"title":"Handling practices and microbiological assessment of wooden and plastic cutting boards in domestic kitchens","authors":"Janaina Prieto de Oliveira ,&nbsp;Dionice Capistrano da Silva ,&nbsp;Leonardo Ereno Tadielo ,&nbsp;Emanoelli Aparecida Rodrigues dos Santos ,&nbsp;Evelyn Cristine da Silva ,&nbsp;Aryele Nunes da Cruz Encide Sampaio ,&nbsp;Fábio Sossai Possebon ,&nbsp;Juliano Gonçalves Pereira","doi":"10.1016/j.lwt.2025.117606","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study assessed the handling practices and microbiological characteristics of wooden and plastic cutting boards in households in a Brazilian city. A total of 100 boards were collected, along with a survey on their use. Bacteria were extracted from circular fragments (4.4 cm diameter) through sonication and analyzed for aerobic mesophilic bacteria, Enterobacteriaceae, <em>Pseudomonas</em> spp., <em>Listeria monocytogenes</em>, and <em>Escherichia coli</em>. Bacterial counts were expressed in log CFU/cm<sup>2</sup>, and pathogen presence was recorded. A 2.2 cm fragment was also examined via scanning electron microscopy. Survey results showed that 87% of food handlers used the same board for all foods, and 75% had used their board for over two years. Plastic boards had higher counts of aerobic mesophilic bacteria and Enterobacteriaceae (p &lt; 0.05). However, newer wooden boards also showed high bacterial counts (p &lt; 0.05). <em>L. monocytogenes</em> was detected in 3% of samples, and <em>E. coli</em> in 5%, with no significant differences between materials. These findings highlight cutting boards as potential cross-contamination sources and emphasize the presence of <em>L. monocytogenes</em>. Proper handling practices are essential to reducing contamination risks, especially in households.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":382,"journal":{"name":"LWT - Food Science and Technology","volume":"221 ","pages":"Article 117606"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LWT - Food Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0023643825002907","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study assessed the handling practices and microbiological characteristics of wooden and plastic cutting boards in households in a Brazilian city. A total of 100 boards were collected, along with a survey on their use. Bacteria were extracted from circular fragments (4.4 cm diameter) through sonication and analyzed for aerobic mesophilic bacteria, Enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonas spp., Listeria monocytogenes, and Escherichia coli. Bacterial counts were expressed in log CFU/cm2, and pathogen presence was recorded. A 2.2 cm fragment was also examined via scanning electron microscopy. Survey results showed that 87% of food handlers used the same board for all foods, and 75% had used their board for over two years. Plastic boards had higher counts of aerobic mesophilic bacteria and Enterobacteriaceae (p < 0.05). However, newer wooden boards also showed high bacterial counts (p < 0.05). L. monocytogenes was detected in 3% of samples, and E. coli in 5%, with no significant differences between materials. These findings highlight cutting boards as potential cross-contamination sources and emphasize the presence of L. monocytogenes. Proper handling practices are essential to reducing contamination risks, especially in households.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
LWT - Food Science and Technology
LWT - Food Science and Technology 工程技术-食品科技
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
6.70%
发文量
1724
审稿时长
65 days
期刊介绍: LWT - Food Science and Technology is an international journal that publishes innovative papers in the fields of food chemistry, biochemistry, microbiology, technology and nutrition. The work described should be innovative either in the approach or in the methods used. The significance of the results either for the science community or for the food industry must also be specified. Contributions written in English are welcomed in the form of review articles, short reviews, research papers, and research notes. Papers featuring animal trials and cell cultures are outside the scope of the journal and will not be considered for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信