Suture Removal Timing and its Effect on Root Coverage: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Gonzalo Blasi, Lise Maury, Ada Lapedra, Javi Vilarrasa, Alberto Monje, Jose Nart
{"title":"Suture Removal Timing and its Effect on Root Coverage: A Randomized Clinical Trial.","authors":"Gonzalo Blasi, Lise Maury, Ada Lapedra, Javi Vilarrasa, Alberto Monje, Jose Nart","doi":"10.11607/prd.7525","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the impact of suture removal timing on the clinical outcomes of root coverage procedures.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this single-blinded, randomized prospective clinical trial, patients presenting with multiple gingival recessions were allocated into three groups based on the timing of suture removal post-surgery: 1 week (TSR1), 2 weeks (TSR2), and 3 weeks (TSR3). Primary outcomes measured included Percentage of Root Coverage (%RC) and Complete Root Coverage (CRC), among other clinical outcomes. Data were collected at baseline and at 3 and 6 months postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At 6 months, the %RC was 58.4% (TSR1), 91.5% (TSR2), and 75.7% (TSR3). TSR2 achieved a 28.9% higher %RC than TSR1, while no significant differences were found between TSR2 and TSR3. CRC was 38.2% (TSR1), 78.6% (TSR2), and 62.5% (TSR3). TSR2 resulted in a 5.92-fold increase in CRC compared to TSR1, whereas no significant difference was observed between TSR2 and TSR3.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This suggests that a 2-week period before suture removal may optimize root coverage outcomes. However, extending suture removal timing beyond 2 weeks did not confer additional benefits.These findings are specific to the use of polypropylene and the CAF plus connective tissue graft. (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier [NCT04826653]).</p>","PeriodicalId":94231,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry","volume":"0 0","pages":"1-26"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/prd.7525","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the impact of suture removal timing on the clinical outcomes of root coverage procedures.

Materials and methods: In this single-blinded, randomized prospective clinical trial, patients presenting with multiple gingival recessions were allocated into three groups based on the timing of suture removal post-surgery: 1 week (TSR1), 2 weeks (TSR2), and 3 weeks (TSR3). Primary outcomes measured included Percentage of Root Coverage (%RC) and Complete Root Coverage (CRC), among other clinical outcomes. Data were collected at baseline and at 3 and 6 months postoperatively.

Results: At 6 months, the %RC was 58.4% (TSR1), 91.5% (TSR2), and 75.7% (TSR3). TSR2 achieved a 28.9% higher %RC than TSR1, while no significant differences were found between TSR2 and TSR3. CRC was 38.2% (TSR1), 78.6% (TSR2), and 62.5% (TSR3). TSR2 resulted in a 5.92-fold increase in CRC compared to TSR1, whereas no significant difference was observed between TSR2 and TSR3.

Conclusions: This suggests that a 2-week period before suture removal may optimize root coverage outcomes. However, extending suture removal timing beyond 2 weeks did not confer additional benefits.These findings are specific to the use of polypropylene and the CAF plus connective tissue graft. (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier [NCT04826653]).

拆线时机及其对牙根覆盖的影响:一项随机临床试验。
目的:评价缝线拔除时间对根管覆盖手术临床效果的影响。材料和方法:在这项单盲、随机前瞻性临床试验中,根据术后拆线时间将出现多发牙龈萎缩的患者分为三组:1周(TSR1)、2周(TSR2)和3周(TSR3)。测量的主要结果包括根覆盖百分比(%RC)和完全根覆盖(CRC),以及其他临床结果。在基线和术后3个月和6个月收集数据。结果:6个月时,%RC分别为58.4% (TSR1)、91.5% (TSR2)和75.7% (TSR3)。TSR2的RC比TSR1高28.9%,而TSR2和TSR3之间无显著差异。CRC为38.2% (TSR1), 78.6% (TSR2)和62.5% (TSR3)。与TSR1相比,TSR2导致CRC增加5.92倍,而TSR2和TSR3之间没有显著差异。结论:这表明缝线拆除前2周的时间可以优化牙根覆盖效果。然而,延长拆线时间超过2周并不能带来额外的好处。这些结果是聚丙烯和CAF +结缔组织移植物的特异性结果。(ClinicalTrials.gov识别码[NCT04826653])。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信