Food-related implicit associations predict self-reported eating behaviors and dietary habits in large US samples

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Obesity Pub Date : 2025-03-04 DOI:10.1002/oby.24247
Matt B. Siroty, Julia M. P. Bittner, Jennifer L. Howell, Bobby K. Cheon
{"title":"Food-related implicit associations predict self-reported eating behaviors and dietary habits in large US samples","authors":"Matt B. Siroty,&nbsp;Julia M. P. Bittner,&nbsp;Jennifer L. Howell,&nbsp;Bobby K. Cheon","doi":"10.1002/oby.24247","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>Implicit associations, i.e., automatically activated attitudes and intuitions, may contribute to isolated food choices and body weight. Studies of food-related implicit associations have yielded mixed results and have not explored their role in eating behaviors or dietary patterns. We examined implicit associations toward the palatability and acceptability (vs. shame) of healthy food and their relationships with self-reported eating behaviors (eating in absence of hunger) and dietary patterns (fruit, vegetable, and sugar-sweetened beverage consumption) and socioeconomic indicators.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Two US samples (i.e., Palatable Food, <i>n</i> = 11,504; and Acceptable Food, <i>n</i> = 12,128) from Project Implicit Health were analyzed. Implicit associations were measured with Implicit Association Tests. Linear and logistic regressions examined associations of implicit and related explicit self-reported responses (perceived healthy eating and acceptability of healthy food, respectively) with eating behaviors, dietary patterns, and socioeconomic indicators.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>One-sample <i>t</i> tests revealed health-favoring implicit palatability and acceptability associations. Implicit associations predicted healthier self-reported eating behaviors and dietary patterns independent of explicit responses. There were inconsistent associations with socioeconomic indicators.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Health-favoring implicit food-related associations uniquely contribute to healthier eating behaviors and dietary patterns. These health-favoring associations could be a promising, yet underrecognized, target to promote healthier diets in the United States.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":215,"journal":{"name":"Obesity","volume":"33 4","pages":"796-806"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obesity","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/oby.24247","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Implicit associations, i.e., automatically activated attitudes and intuitions, may contribute to isolated food choices and body weight. Studies of food-related implicit associations have yielded mixed results and have not explored their role in eating behaviors or dietary patterns. We examined implicit associations toward the palatability and acceptability (vs. shame) of healthy food and their relationships with self-reported eating behaviors (eating in absence of hunger) and dietary patterns (fruit, vegetable, and sugar-sweetened beverage consumption) and socioeconomic indicators.

Methods

Two US samples (i.e., Palatable Food, n = 11,504; and Acceptable Food, n = 12,128) from Project Implicit Health were analyzed. Implicit associations were measured with Implicit Association Tests. Linear and logistic regressions examined associations of implicit and related explicit self-reported responses (perceived healthy eating and acceptability of healthy food, respectively) with eating behaviors, dietary patterns, and socioeconomic indicators.

Results

One-sample t tests revealed health-favoring implicit palatability and acceptability associations. Implicit associations predicted healthier self-reported eating behaviors and dietary patterns independent of explicit responses. There were inconsistent associations with socioeconomic indicators.

Conclusions

Health-favoring implicit food-related associations uniquely contribute to healthier eating behaviors and dietary patterns. These health-favoring associations could be a promising, yet underrecognized, target to promote healthier diets in the United States.

在美国的大样本中,食物相关的内隐关联预测了自我报告的饮食行为和饮食习惯。
目的:内隐联想,即自动激活的态度和直觉,可能有助于孤立的食物选择和体重。对食物相关的内隐关联的研究产生了不同的结果,并没有探索它们在饮食行为或饮食模式中的作用。我们研究了与健康食品的适口性和可接受性(相对于羞耻感)的内在联系,以及它们与自我报告的饮食行为(在没有饥饿的情况下进食)、饮食模式(水果、蔬菜和含糖饮料的消费)和社会经济指标的关系。方法:两份美国样本(即,可口食品,n = 11,504;和可接受的食物,n = 12128)。用内隐联想测验测量内隐联想。线性和逻辑回归检验了内隐和相关的外显自我报告反应(分别是健康饮食的感知和健康食品的可接受性)与饮食行为、饮食模式和社会经济指标的关联。结果:单样本t检验揭示了有利于健康的内隐适口性和可接受性关联。内隐关联预测了独立于外显反应的更健康的自我报告饮食行为和饮食模式。与社会经济指标之间存在不一致的关联。结论:有利于健康的隐性食物相关关联独特地促进了更健康的饮食行为和饮食模式。这些有利于健康的联系可能是一个有希望的,但尚未得到充分认识的目标,以促进美国的健康饮食。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Obesity
Obesity 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
1.40%
发文量
261
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Obesity is the official journal of The Obesity Society and is the premier source of information for increasing knowledge, fostering translational research from basic to population science, and promoting better treatment for people with obesity. Obesity publishes important peer-reviewed research and cutting-edge reviews, commentaries, and public health and medical developments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信