Suicide and suicidality surveillance in military populations: a scoping review.

S Hodges, A Ramage, C Meurk, E Heffernan
{"title":"Suicide and suicidality surveillance in military populations: a scoping review.","authors":"S Hodges, A Ramage, C Meurk, E Heffernan","doi":"10.1093/pubmed/fdaf026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Suicide and suicidality are a serious public health concern for military populations globally. Systematic surveillance is a key component to creating an evidence base for prevention strategies. The aim of this scoping review is to map how suicide and suicidality is surveilled in military populations, and to summarize key inclusions, limitations and gaps.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A scoping review of four databases (PubMed, PsychInfo, ProQuest and CINAHL) and a targeted grey literature search of official military websites using Google was conducted using variations of the search terms 'Suicidality,' 'Military' and 'Surveillance'. Sources that referenced systematic, population-level data collection on suicide and/or suicidality in active duty military personnel, written in English with any publication date, were considered. Sources that used veteran and part-time personnel data were excluded, as were sources that focused exclusively on subsets of the population such as one job role or one overseas deployment rotation. Descriptive analysis was conducted, comparing sources across surveillance type, data collection and usages, and limitations and author recommendations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-six articles were identified by the search criteria. Most sources were from the USA (n = 14), and publication dates ranged from 1968 to 2023. The most common surveillance systems were military mortality databases focused on death by suicide. Ideation, non-suicidal self-injury and suicide attempts were under-surveilled, as were event and outcome characteristics. Best-practice guidelines were unable to be determined due to the heterogeneity of systems and paucity of published details.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study was the first scoping review to map the application of surveillance systems specifically in military populations. We identified an over-reliance on mortality databases, a paucity of surveillance of non-fatal suicidality and opportunities for improvement including enhanced data collection and the integration of lived experience perspectives. The findings of this review contribute new knowledge to the field and have important research and practical implications.</p>","PeriodicalId":94107,"journal":{"name":"Journal of public health (Oxford, England)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of public health (Oxford, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdaf026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Suicide and suicidality are a serious public health concern for military populations globally. Systematic surveillance is a key component to creating an evidence base for prevention strategies. The aim of this scoping review is to map how suicide and suicidality is surveilled in military populations, and to summarize key inclusions, limitations and gaps.

Methods: A scoping review of four databases (PubMed, PsychInfo, ProQuest and CINAHL) and a targeted grey literature search of official military websites using Google was conducted using variations of the search terms 'Suicidality,' 'Military' and 'Surveillance'. Sources that referenced systematic, population-level data collection on suicide and/or suicidality in active duty military personnel, written in English with any publication date, were considered. Sources that used veteran and part-time personnel data were excluded, as were sources that focused exclusively on subsets of the population such as one job role or one overseas deployment rotation. Descriptive analysis was conducted, comparing sources across surveillance type, data collection and usages, and limitations and author recommendations.

Results: Twenty-six articles were identified by the search criteria. Most sources were from the USA (n = 14), and publication dates ranged from 1968 to 2023. The most common surveillance systems were military mortality databases focused on death by suicide. Ideation, non-suicidal self-injury and suicide attempts were under-surveilled, as were event and outcome characteristics. Best-practice guidelines were unable to be determined due to the heterogeneity of systems and paucity of published details.

Conclusion: This study was the first scoping review to map the application of surveillance systems specifically in military populations. We identified an over-reliance on mortality databases, a paucity of surveillance of non-fatal suicidality and opportunities for improvement including enhanced data collection and the integration of lived experience perspectives. The findings of this review contribute new knowledge to the field and have important research and practical implications.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信