Do caregivers of traumatic brain injury survivors experience post-traumatic growth? A mixed-methods study exploring the positive experiences of informal caregivers.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Brain Impairment Pub Date : 2025-03-01 DOI:10.1071/IB24019
Molly Hillyard, Ryan Westley, Jade Kettlewell
{"title":"Do caregivers of traumatic brain injury survivors experience post-traumatic growth? A mixed-methods study exploring the positive experiences of informal caregivers.","authors":"Molly Hillyard, Ryan Westley, Jade Kettlewell","doi":"10.1071/IB24019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background There are currently 5.7million informal caregivers in the UK, with many experiencing psychological distress, compromised social functioning and poor quality of life. Improving the negative impact of caregiving has been a key focus of research in this population. However, there is limited research on the positive experiences of informal caregivers, particularly those caring for traumatic brain injury (TBI) survivors. This study aimed to explore whether informal TBI caregivers have positive experiences resulting from their role and investigate the possibility of post-traumatic growth (PTG). Methods Mixed-methods study. Quantitative data analysed using descriptive statistics. Qualitative data were analysed thematically. Data sets were synthesised and compared for agreement. Online semi-structured interviews were conducted with informal TBI caregivers, alongside a demographic questionnaire and validated PTG measure (Post-Traumatic Growth Inventory - Short Form, PTGI-SF). Results Ten TBI caregivers were recruited (n =10 male). The highest-scoring PTGI-SF domain across participants was 'personal strength' (mean=8.3; standard deviation, s.d.=1.5). The lowest-scoring domain was 'greater appreciation for life' (mean=7.1, s.d.=2.6). Six qualitative themes included: (1) deepened personal connections, (2) strengthened spiritual beliefs, (3) personal growth and resilience, (4) transformed life priorities and purpose, (5) improved coping mechanisms and (6) emergence of new opportunities and pathways. Findings revealed how caregivers adapted positively through caregiving experiences. Conclusions TBI caregivers appeared to experience PTG through caring. Future studies should employ mixed-methods to explore PTG in female TBI caregivers, adaptive coping strategies and the prevalence of occupational burden, facilitating the development of targeted interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":56329,"journal":{"name":"Brain Impairment","volume":"26 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain Impairment","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/IB24019","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background There are currently 5.7million informal caregivers in the UK, with many experiencing psychological distress, compromised social functioning and poor quality of life. Improving the negative impact of caregiving has been a key focus of research in this population. However, there is limited research on the positive experiences of informal caregivers, particularly those caring for traumatic brain injury (TBI) survivors. This study aimed to explore whether informal TBI caregivers have positive experiences resulting from their role and investigate the possibility of post-traumatic growth (PTG). Methods Mixed-methods study. Quantitative data analysed using descriptive statistics. Qualitative data were analysed thematically. Data sets were synthesised and compared for agreement. Online semi-structured interviews were conducted with informal TBI caregivers, alongside a demographic questionnaire and validated PTG measure (Post-Traumatic Growth Inventory - Short Form, PTGI-SF). Results Ten TBI caregivers were recruited (n =10 male). The highest-scoring PTGI-SF domain across participants was 'personal strength' (mean=8.3; standard deviation, s.d.=1.5). The lowest-scoring domain was 'greater appreciation for life' (mean=7.1, s.d.=2.6). Six qualitative themes included: (1) deepened personal connections, (2) strengthened spiritual beliefs, (3) personal growth and resilience, (4) transformed life priorities and purpose, (5) improved coping mechanisms and (6) emergence of new opportunities and pathways. Findings revealed how caregivers adapted positively through caregiving experiences. Conclusions TBI caregivers appeared to experience PTG through caring. Future studies should employ mixed-methods to explore PTG in female TBI caregivers, adaptive coping strategies and the prevalence of occupational burden, facilitating the development of targeted interventions.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Brain Impairment
Brain Impairment CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-NEUROSCIENCES
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal addresses topics related to the aetiology, epidemiology, treatment and outcomes of brain impairment with a particular focus on the implications for functional status, participation, rehabilitation and quality of life. Disciplines reflect a broad multidisciplinary scope and include neuroscience, neurology, neuropsychology, psychiatry, clinical psychology, occupational therapy, physiotherapy, speech pathology, social work, and nursing. Submissions are welcome across the full range of conditions that affect brain function (stroke, tumour, progressive neurological illnesses, dementia, traumatic brain injury, epilepsy, etc.) throughout the lifespan.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信