Deciphering key features of social resilience versus social vulnerability in later life: A biopsychosocial model of social asymmetry.

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Hai-Xin Jiang, Jing Yu
{"title":"Deciphering key features of social resilience versus social vulnerability in later life: A biopsychosocial model of social asymmetry.","authors":"Hai-Xin Jiang, Jing Yu","doi":"10.1093/geronb/gbaf046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Confronted with shrinking social networks, older adults exhibit individual differences in social adaptability, reflected as socially resilient versus socially vulnerable. The purpose of this study was to examine key features that reflect this social asymmetry in later life.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three datasets were analyzed, with the training set (N = 424) included older adults from China, while two test sets (N1 = 2877, N2 = 2343) were from the United States. Social asymmetry was assessed using residuals from a regression of social network on loneliness, with individuals with positive residuals categorized as socially vulnerable and those with negative residuals as socially resilient. Feature selection was performed with the Boruta algorithm, model building with the gradient boosting machine (GBM) algorithm, and model interpretation with the local interpretable model-agnostic explanations (LIME) algorithm.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Socially resilient older adults were more prevalent than socially vulnerable ones across datasets from various cultural backgrounds. Five key features-depression, anxiety, stress, sleep disturbance, and personality-were found to predict social asymmetry, with area under the curve (AUC) values ranging from 0.76-0.86 across datasets. Older adults with lower levels of depression, anxiety, stress, and sleep disturbance, and typical A or B (versus intermediate) personality, were more likely to be socially resilient.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The prevalence of socially resilient older adults indicates a relatively positive trend, and most of the key features are plastic and amenable, such as negative emotions and sleep behavior. Developing emotional regulation strategies and providing sleep hygiene education could improve the social adaptability of older adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":56111,"journal":{"name":"Journals of Gerontology Series B-Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journals of Gerontology Series B-Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbaf046","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Confronted with shrinking social networks, older adults exhibit individual differences in social adaptability, reflected as socially resilient versus socially vulnerable. The purpose of this study was to examine key features that reflect this social asymmetry in later life.

Methods: Three datasets were analyzed, with the training set (N = 424) included older adults from China, while two test sets (N1 = 2877, N2 = 2343) were from the United States. Social asymmetry was assessed using residuals from a regression of social network on loneliness, with individuals with positive residuals categorized as socially vulnerable and those with negative residuals as socially resilient. Feature selection was performed with the Boruta algorithm, model building with the gradient boosting machine (GBM) algorithm, and model interpretation with the local interpretable model-agnostic explanations (LIME) algorithm.

Results: Socially resilient older adults were more prevalent than socially vulnerable ones across datasets from various cultural backgrounds. Five key features-depression, anxiety, stress, sleep disturbance, and personality-were found to predict social asymmetry, with area under the curve (AUC) values ranging from 0.76-0.86 across datasets. Older adults with lower levels of depression, anxiety, stress, and sleep disturbance, and typical A or B (versus intermediate) personality, were more likely to be socially resilient.

Discussion: The prevalence of socially resilient older adults indicates a relatively positive trend, and most of the key features are plastic and amenable, such as negative emotions and sleep behavior. Developing emotional regulation strategies and providing sleep hygiene education could improve the social adaptability of older adults.

解读晚年社会弹性与社会脆弱性的关键特征:社会不对称的生物心理社会模型。
目的:面对不断缩小的社会网络,老年人在社会适应方面表现出个体差异,反映为社会弹性与社会脆弱性。这项研究的目的是研究在以后的生活中反映这种社会不对称的关键特征。方法:对3个数据集进行分析,其中训练集(N = 424)为中国老年人,2个测试集(N1 = 2877, N2 = 2343)为美国老年人。利用社会网络对孤独的回归残差来评估社会不对称性,残差为正的个体被归类为社会弱势群体,残差为负的个体被归类为社会弹性群体。使用Boruta算法进行特征选择,使用梯度增强机(GBM)算法进行模型构建,使用局部可解释模型不可知论解释(LIME)算法进行模型解释。结果:在不同文化背景的数据集中,社会弹性老年人比社会脆弱老年人更普遍。研究发现,五个关键特征——抑郁、焦虑、压力、睡眠障碍和个性——可以预测社会不对称,各数据集的曲线下面积(AUC)值在0.76-0.86之间。抑郁、焦虑、压力和睡眠障碍程度较低的老年人,以及典型的A或B型人格(相对于中级人格),更有可能具有社交弹性。讨论:社会弹性老年人的流行表明了一个相对积极的趋势,大多数关键特征是可塑和可顺从的,例如负面情绪和睡眠行为。制定情绪调节策略和提供睡眠卫生教育可以提高老年人的社会适应能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
8.10%
发文量
178
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences publishes articles on development in adulthood and old age that advance the psychological science of aging processes and outcomes. Articles have clear implications for theoretical or methodological innovation in the psychology of aging or contribute significantly to the empirical understanding of psychological processes and aging. Areas of interest include, but are not limited to, attitudes, clinical applications, cognition, education, emotion, health, human factors, interpersonal relations, neuropsychology, perception, personality, physiological psychology, social psychology, and sensation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信