Investigating the gut microbiome in schizophrenia cases versus controls: South Africa's version.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Carlien Rust, Laila Asmal, Michaela O'Hare, Etheresia Pretorius, Robin Emsley, Soraya Seedat, Sian Hemmings
{"title":"Investigating the gut microbiome in schizophrenia cases versus controls: South Africa's version.","authors":"Carlien Rust, Laila Asmal, Michaela O'Hare, Etheresia Pretorius, Robin Emsley, Soraya Seedat, Sian Hemmings","doi":"10.1007/s10048-025-00816-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Schizophrenia (SCZ) is a chronic and severe mental disorder with a complex molecular aetiology. Emerging evidence indicates a potential association between the gut microbiome and the development of SCZ. Considering the under-representation of African populations in SCZ research, this study aimed to explore the association between the gut microbiome and SCZ within a South African cohort. Gut microbial DNA was obtained from 89 participants (n = 41 SCZ cases; n = 48 controls) and underwent 16S rRNA (V4) sequencing. Data preparation and taxa classification were performed with the DADA2 pipeline in R studio followed by diversity analysis using QIIME2. Analysis of Compositions of Microbiomes with Bias Correction (ANCOM-BC) was utilised to identify differentially abundant taxa. No statistically significant differences were observed between SCZ patients and controls in terms of alpha-diversity (Shannon q = 0.09; Simpson q = 0.174) or beta-diversity (p = 0.547). Five taxa, namely Prevotella (p = 0.037), Faecalibacterium (p = 0.032), Phascolarctobacterium (p = 0.002), Dialister (p = 0.043), and SMB53 (p = 0.012), were differentially abundant in cases compared to controls, but this observation did not survive correction for multiple testing. This exploratory study suggests a potential association between the relative abundance of Prevotella, Faecalibacterium, Phascolarctobacterium, Dialister, and SMB53 with SCZ case-control status. Given the lack of significance after correcting for multiple testing, these results should be interpreted with caution. Mechanistic studies in larger samples are warranted to confirm these findings and better understand the association between the gut microbiome and SCZ.</p>","PeriodicalId":56106,"journal":{"name":"Neurogenetics","volume":"26 1","pages":"34"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11882724/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurogenetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10048-025-00816-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Schizophrenia (SCZ) is a chronic and severe mental disorder with a complex molecular aetiology. Emerging evidence indicates a potential association between the gut microbiome and the development of SCZ. Considering the under-representation of African populations in SCZ research, this study aimed to explore the association between the gut microbiome and SCZ within a South African cohort. Gut microbial DNA was obtained from 89 participants (n = 41 SCZ cases; n = 48 controls) and underwent 16S rRNA (V4) sequencing. Data preparation and taxa classification were performed with the DADA2 pipeline in R studio followed by diversity analysis using QIIME2. Analysis of Compositions of Microbiomes with Bias Correction (ANCOM-BC) was utilised to identify differentially abundant taxa. No statistically significant differences were observed between SCZ patients and controls in terms of alpha-diversity (Shannon q = 0.09; Simpson q = 0.174) or beta-diversity (p = 0.547). Five taxa, namely Prevotella (p = 0.037), Faecalibacterium (p = 0.032), Phascolarctobacterium (p = 0.002), Dialister (p = 0.043), and SMB53 (p = 0.012), were differentially abundant in cases compared to controls, but this observation did not survive correction for multiple testing. This exploratory study suggests a potential association between the relative abundance of Prevotella, Faecalibacterium, Phascolarctobacterium, Dialister, and SMB53 with SCZ case-control status. Given the lack of significance after correcting for multiple testing, these results should be interpreted with caution. Mechanistic studies in larger samples are warranted to confirm these findings and better understand the association between the gut microbiome and SCZ.

精神分裂症(SCZ)是一种慢性严重精神障碍,分子病因复杂。新出现的证据表明,肠道微生物组与精神分裂症的发病可能存在关联。考虑到非洲人群在SCZ研究中的代表性不足,本研究旨在探索南非队列中肠道微生物组与SCZ之间的关联。研究人员从89名参与者(n = 41名SCZ病例;n = 48名对照组)中获得了肠道微生物DNA,并对其进行了16S rRNA(V4)测序。使用 R studio 中的 DADA2 管道进行数据准备和分类,然后使用 QIIME2 进行多样性分析。利用带偏差校正的微生物组组成分析(ANCOM-BC)来确定不同的丰富类群。在α-多样性(香农q = 0.09;辛普森q = 0.174)或β-多样性(p = 0.547)方面,SCZ 患者和对照组之间未观察到有统计学意义的差异。与对照组相比,病例中的五个分类群,即普雷沃特氏菌(p = 0.037)、粪便杆菌(p = 0.032)、法氏囊状杆菌(p = 0.002)、Dialister(p = 0.043)和 SMB53(p = 0.012)的含量不同,但这一观察结果没有通过多重检验校正。这项探索性研究表明,普雷沃特氏菌、粪便杆菌、法氏囊状杆菌、Dialister 和 SMB53 的相对丰度与 SCZ 病例对照状态之间可能存在关联。鉴于多重检验校正后的结果缺乏显著性,因此应谨慎解释这些结果。有必要在更大的样本中进行机制研究,以证实这些发现,并更好地理解肠道微生物组与 SCZ 之间的关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurogenetics
Neurogenetics 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Neurogenetics publishes findings that contribute to a better understanding of the genetic basis of normal and abnormal function of the nervous system. Neurogenetic disorders are the main focus of the journal. Neurogenetics therefore includes findings in humans and other organisms that help understand neurological disease mechanisms and publishes papers from many different fields such as biophysics, cell biology, human genetics, neuroanatomy, neurochemistry, neurology, neuropathology, neurosurgery and psychiatry. All papers submitted to Neurogenetics should be of sufficient immediate importance to justify urgent publication. They should present new scientific results. Data merely confirming previously published findings are not acceptable.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信