Knowledge, Awareness, and Attitudes Regarding Axial Spondylarthritis Among Nonrheumatology Physicians in the United States.

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q2 RHEUMATOLOGY
William Odell, Swetha Alexander, Narinder Maheshwari, Abhijeet Danve
{"title":"Knowledge, Awareness, and Attitudes Regarding Axial Spondylarthritis Among Nonrheumatology Physicians in the United States.","authors":"William Odell, Swetha Alexander, Narinder Maheshwari, Abhijeet Danve","doi":"10.3899/jrheum.2024-0552","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We surveyed physicians in the United States to assess knowledge, awareness, and attitudes toward axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). The objective was to identify barriers for referral and opportunities for intervention to reduce diagnostic delay of axSpA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An online questionnaire was distributed nationwide to nonrheumatology physicians (NRPs) serving patients with chronic back pain (CBP), namely in family/internal medicine, spine surgery/orthopedics, pain management, physical medicine/rehabilitation, and to rheumatologists as the comparator group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven hundred fifty physicians completed the survey (response rate 24%). The majority of NRPs were familiar with inflammatory back pain (IBP); 87% could identify > 4 of 8 IBP items, but only 41% routinely assess for IBP in practice. NRPs screen patients for axSpA risk factors ≤ 50% of the time. NRPs order C-reactive protein and HLA-B27 tests significantly less often, and antinuclear antibodies and rheumatoid factor tests significantly more often than rheumatologists in patients with CBP. Only 50% of NRPs correctly answered sacroiliac/pelvic radiograph as the correct initial imaging test, and 37% correctly selected magnetic resonance imaging of the pelvis as the next imaging test. Unfamiliarity with the terms axSpA and nonradiographic axSpA was reported by 11% and 35% of NRPs, respectively, and NRPs less often consider axSpA as a possible diagnosis in patients with CBP. Formal referral guidelines for patients with suspected axSpA were felt to be important by NRPs and rheumatologists alike.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is a substantial lack of knowledge and awareness about nomenclature, laboratory testing, and proper imaging of axSpA among NRPs. Unnecessary laboratory tests are commonly ordered by NRPs and rheumatologists. Formal referral guidelines and improved education may help reduce diagnostic delay of axSpA.</p>","PeriodicalId":50064,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rheumatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.2024-0552","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: We surveyed physicians in the United States to assess knowledge, awareness, and attitudes toward axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). The objective was to identify barriers for referral and opportunities for intervention to reduce diagnostic delay of axSpA.

Methods: An online questionnaire was distributed nationwide to nonrheumatology physicians (NRPs) serving patients with chronic back pain (CBP), namely in family/internal medicine, spine surgery/orthopedics, pain management, physical medicine/rehabilitation, and to rheumatologists as the comparator group.

Results: Seven hundred fifty physicians completed the survey (response rate 24%). The majority of NRPs were familiar with inflammatory back pain (IBP); 87% could identify > 4 of 8 IBP items, but only 41% routinely assess for IBP in practice. NRPs screen patients for axSpA risk factors ≤ 50% of the time. NRPs order C-reactive protein and HLA-B27 tests significantly less often, and antinuclear antibodies and rheumatoid factor tests significantly more often than rheumatologists in patients with CBP. Only 50% of NRPs correctly answered sacroiliac/pelvic radiograph as the correct initial imaging test, and 37% correctly selected magnetic resonance imaging of the pelvis as the next imaging test. Unfamiliarity with the terms axSpA and nonradiographic axSpA was reported by 11% and 35% of NRPs, respectively, and NRPs less often consider axSpA as a possible diagnosis in patients with CBP. Formal referral guidelines for patients with suspected axSpA were felt to be important by NRPs and rheumatologists alike.

Conclusion: There is a substantial lack of knowledge and awareness about nomenclature, laboratory testing, and proper imaging of axSpA among NRPs. Unnecessary laboratory tests are commonly ordered by NRPs and rheumatologists. Formal referral guidelines and improved education may help reduce diagnostic delay of axSpA.

美国非风湿病医生对轴型脊柱炎的知识、意识和态度。
目的:我们系统地调查了美国的医生,以评估他们对轴性脊柱炎(axSpA)的知识、意识和态度。目的是确定转诊障碍和干预机会,以减少axSpA的诊断延迟。方法:在全国范围内向服务慢性背痛(CBP)患者的非风湿病医师(NRP)(即家庭/内科、脊柱外科/骨科、疼痛管理、物理医学/康复)和风湿病学家(作为对照组)分发在线问卷。结果:750名医生完成调查,回复率24%。大多数NRP患者熟悉炎症性背痛(IBP), 87%的患者能够识别8个IBP项目中的bbb40个,但在实践中只有40%的患者常规评估IBP。NRP筛查CBP患者axSpA危险因素的时间为50%或更少。与风湿病学家相比,CBP患者的NRP订单CRP和HLA-B27明显较少,ANA和RF明显较多。只有50%的NRP正确回答x线SI/骨盆作为正确的初始影像学检查,只有37%的NRP正确选择MRI骨盆作为下一次影像学检查。分别有11%和35%的NRP报告不熟悉axSpA和nr-axSpA这两个术语,并且NRP很少考虑axSpA/AS作为CBP患者的可能诊断。NRP和风湿病学家认为axSpA患者的正式转诊指南很重要或非常重要。结论:在非风湿病学家中,对axSpA的命名、实验室检测和正确成像的知识和意识严重缺乏。在CBP患者中,非风湿病学家和风湿病学家通常会要求进行不必要的实验室检查。正式的转诊指南和改进的教育可能有助于减少axSpA的诊断延迟。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Rheumatology
Journal of Rheumatology 医学-风湿病学
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
5.10%
发文量
285
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Rheumatology is a monthly international serial edited by Earl D. Silverman. The Journal features research articles on clinical subjects from scientists working in rheumatology and related fields, as well as proceedings of meetings as supplements to regular issues. Highlights of our 41 years serving Rheumatology include: groundbreaking and provocative editorials such as "Inverting the Pyramid," renowned Pediatric Rheumatology, proceedings of OMERACT and the Canadian Rheumatology Association, Cochrane Musculoskeletal Reviews, and supplements on emerging therapies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信