"Frank Antagonism to Patterned Organization": Medical Technology, Professional Power, and the Development of US Medical Device Regulation, 1950-1976.

IF 0.4 3区 哲学 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Brice Bowrey
{"title":"\"Frank Antagonism to Patterned Organization\": Medical Technology, Professional Power, and the Development of US Medical Device Regulation, 1950-1976.","authors":"Brice Bowrey","doi":"10.1093/jhmas/jraf001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>New medical devices and diagnostic tools dramatically expanded the capabilities of modern medicine in the late twentieth century. Nevertheless, many contemporary commentators argue that American medical devices receive insufficient regulatory scrutiny and often pose significant safety risks. This article probes the foundations of US medical device regulation by analyzing the technoscientific practices of physicians and engineers who designed or regulated medical technologies. Studying this history through the lens of professional power dynamics reveals the medical profession as one of the primary power brokers in device ecosystems. Physicians used their collective status and influence as medical experts to shape the legislation governing medical technology and oppose policies threatening their professional autonomy. Situating conversations about device regulation in the historical and sociological literature on professionalization demonstrates the salience of physicians' professional power in creating the modern regulatory environment.</p>","PeriodicalId":49998,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jhmas/jraf001","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

New medical devices and diagnostic tools dramatically expanded the capabilities of modern medicine in the late twentieth century. Nevertheless, many contemporary commentators argue that American medical devices receive insufficient regulatory scrutiny and often pose significant safety risks. This article probes the foundations of US medical device regulation by analyzing the technoscientific practices of physicians and engineers who designed or regulated medical technologies. Studying this history through the lens of professional power dynamics reveals the medical profession as one of the primary power brokers in device ecosystems. Physicians used their collective status and influence as medical experts to shape the legislation governing medical technology and oppose policies threatening their professional autonomy. Situating conversations about device regulation in the historical and sociological literature on professionalization demonstrates the salience of physicians' professional power in creating the modern regulatory environment.

“对模式化组织的坦率对抗”:医疗技术、专业力量和美国医疗器械法规的发展,1950-1976。
20世纪后期,新的医疗设备和诊断工具极大地扩展了现代医学的能力。然而,许多当代评论家认为,美国医疗器械受到的监管审查不足,往往构成重大的安全风险。本文通过分析设计或监管医疗技术的医生和工程师的技术科学实践,探讨了美国医疗器械监管的基础。通过专业权力动力学的视角研究这段历史,可以发现医疗行业是设备生态系统中主要的权力掮客之一。医生利用他们作为医学专家的集体地位和影响力来制定管理医疗技术的立法,并反对威胁他们专业自主权的政策。将关于器械监管的对话置于专业化的历史和社会学文献中,表明医生在创造现代监管环境方面的专业力量是突出的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences
Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences 管理科学-科学史与科学哲学
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Started in 1946, the Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences is internationally recognized as one of the top publications in its field. The journal''s coverage is broad, publishing the latest original research on the written beginnings of medicine in all its aspects. When possible and appropriate, it focuses on what practitioners of the healing arts did or taught, and how their peers, as well as patients, received and interpreted their efforts. Subscribers include clinicians and hospital libraries, as well as academic and public historians.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信