The Recognition, Utilization Rates, Barriers, and Application Accuracy of the Hamstring Strain Clinical Practice Guidelines.

IF 1.6 Q3 SPORT SCIENCES
International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy Pub Date : 2025-03-01 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.26603/001c.129705
Edward Mulligan, Liana Wooten, Tara Dickson, Eric Hegedus, Benjamin Stern
{"title":"The Recognition, Utilization Rates, Barriers, and Application Accuracy of the Hamstring Strain Clinical Practice Guidelines.","authors":"Edward Mulligan, Liana Wooten, Tara Dickson, Eric Hegedus, Benjamin Stern","doi":"10.26603/001c.129705","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) are systematically developed statements designed to promote evidence-based practice, assist in decision-making, and reduce unwarranted deviations in practice. The purpose of this study was to describe the awareness and attitudes of physical therapists (PTs) towards using the Hamstring Strain Injury in Athletes (HSIA) CPG and determine the relationship between barriers, utility, and knowledge of practice guidelines with the behavioral characteristics and clinical care patterns of PTs.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Explorative survey.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Members of the American Academy of Sports Physical Therapy (AASPT) were surveyed regarding their perceived value and application of the HSIA CPG. Descriptive measures of central tendencies and nonparametric analysis were used to describe the data and identify differences. A forward stepwise regression was used to identify variables to explain if the level of CPG awareness and frequency of use were related to selected attitudes, beliefs, and barriers to utilization of the CPG.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty-seven percent of respondents were aware of the CPG resource. Fifty-six percent had read, reviewed, and/or integrated the recommendations into clinical practice. The respondents had a substantial positive opinion regarding its necessity, assistance in decision-making, ease of implementation, ability to improve outcomes, and reduction of unwarranted practice variation. Only 15% of respondents believed the CPG did not provide adequate evidence to adopt its recommendations. Barriers to utilization were the CPG's ability to account for provider expertise and its shortcomings in universally applying its findings to all patients' needs and expectations. Given a specific hamstring injury vignette, respondents accurately chose evidence-based examination, intervention, and injury prevention strategies in the vast majority of cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The HSIA CPG is a valuable resource for PTs in managing athletic injuries. The guideline clearly describes the aims, objectives, population, and evidence that contributes to each recommendation and is being used to improve rehabilitative care.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>3b.</p>","PeriodicalId":47892,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy","volume":"20 3","pages":"373-383"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11872550/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26603/001c.129705","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose: Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) are systematically developed statements designed to promote evidence-based practice, assist in decision-making, and reduce unwarranted deviations in practice. The purpose of this study was to describe the awareness and attitudes of physical therapists (PTs) towards using the Hamstring Strain Injury in Athletes (HSIA) CPG and determine the relationship between barriers, utility, and knowledge of practice guidelines with the behavioral characteristics and clinical care patterns of PTs.

Study design: Explorative survey.

Methods: Members of the American Academy of Sports Physical Therapy (AASPT) were surveyed regarding their perceived value and application of the HSIA CPG. Descriptive measures of central tendencies and nonparametric analysis were used to describe the data and identify differences. A forward stepwise regression was used to identify variables to explain if the level of CPG awareness and frequency of use were related to selected attitudes, beliefs, and barriers to utilization of the CPG.

Results: Eighty-seven percent of respondents were aware of the CPG resource. Fifty-six percent had read, reviewed, and/or integrated the recommendations into clinical practice. The respondents had a substantial positive opinion regarding its necessity, assistance in decision-making, ease of implementation, ability to improve outcomes, and reduction of unwarranted practice variation. Only 15% of respondents believed the CPG did not provide adequate evidence to adopt its recommendations. Barriers to utilization were the CPG's ability to account for provider expertise and its shortcomings in universally applying its findings to all patients' needs and expectations. Given a specific hamstring injury vignette, respondents accurately chose evidence-based examination, intervention, and injury prevention strategies in the vast majority of cases.

Conclusion: The HSIA CPG is a valuable resource for PTs in managing athletic injuries. The guideline clearly describes the aims, objectives, population, and evidence that contributes to each recommendation and is being used to improve rehabilitative care.

Level of evidence: 3b.

腿筋拉伤临床实践指南的识别、使用率、障碍和应用准确性。
背景和目的:临床实践指南(cpg)是系统制定的声明,旨在促进循证实践,协助决策,减少实践中不必要的偏差。本研究的目的是描述物理治疗师(PTs)对使用运动员腿筋拉伤(HSIA) CPG的意识和态度,并确定障碍、效用和实践指南知识与PTs行为特征和临床护理模式之间的关系。研究设计:探索性调查。方法:调查美国运动物理治疗学会(AASPT)会员对HSIA CPG的感知价值和应用情况。使用集中趋势和非参数分析的描述性度量来描述数据和识别差异。采用前向逐步回归来确定变量,以解释CPG意识水平和使用频率是否与选择的态度、信念和使用CPG的障碍有关。结果:87%的受访者知道CPG资源。56%的人已经阅读、审查和/或将这些建议整合到临床实践中。受访者对其必要性、对决策的帮助、实施的便利性、改善结果的能力和减少不必要的实践变化有实质性的积极意见。只有15%的受访者认为中央政府没有提供足够的证据来采纳其建议。利用CPG的障碍是考虑提供者专业知识的能力,以及在将其发现普遍应用于所有患者需求和期望方面的缺点。给定一个特定的腿筋损伤小插曲,在绝大多数情况下,受访者准确地选择了基于证据的检查、干预和伤害预防策略。结论:HSIA CPG是治疗运动损伤的宝贵资源。该指南清楚地描述了各项建议的目的、目标、人群和证据,并正在用于改善康复护理。证据等级:3b。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
5.90%
发文量
124
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信