Intravenous Tranexamic Acid in Rhinoplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Elizabeth S Longino, Nicole G Desisto, Feyi Adegboye, Emily Rebula, Naweed I Chowdhury, Priyesh N Patel, Scott J Stephan, Shiayin F Yang
{"title":"Intravenous Tranexamic Acid in Rhinoplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Elizabeth S Longino, Nicole G Desisto, Feyi Adegboye, Emily Rebula, Naweed I Chowdhury, Priyesh N Patel, Scott J Stephan, Shiayin F Yang","doi":"10.1089/fpsam.2024.0327","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Existing data on tranexamic acid (TXA) in rhinoplasty are mixed. <b>Objective:</b> Compare blood loss, edema, and bruising in patients undergoing septorhinoplasty with or without intravenous (IV) TXA, measured by estimated blood loss and photograph review of edema/ecchymosis. <b>Design:</b> Randomized controlled trial (NCT05774717). <b>Methods:</b> Patients undergoing open septorhinoplasty were eligible. Participants were randomized to receive 1 g IV TXA preoperatively or routine medications only. Intraoperative bleeding was measured using the Boezaart scale and sponge saturation. Patients rated periorbital edema/ecchymosis at 1 week. Photos were reviewed by a facial plastic surgeon to grade edema/ecchymosis. <b>Results:</b> There were 139 participants: 73 (53%) female, mean age of 42 ± 15 years, and 13% revision procedures. Sixty-nine (50%) received TXA. Boezaart scores were 2.25 and 2.41 (<i>p</i> = 0.3), and sponge scores were 0.76 and 0.84 (<i>p</i> = 0.4) in the TXA and control groups, respectively. Postoperative edema/ecchymosis were 1.15/1.19 out of 4 in the TXA group, and 0.97/1.05 in the control group. Surgeon-graded edema/ecchymosis were 1.78/1.76 (TXA) and 1.82/1.86 (control). There was no difference in epistaxis, pain, or appearance satisfaction. <b>Conclusions:</b> In this study, there was no difference in bleeding, edema, ecchymosis, or postoperative experience associated with TXA.</p>","PeriodicalId":48487,"journal":{"name":"Facial Plastic Surgery & Aesthetic Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Facial Plastic Surgery & Aesthetic Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/fpsam.2024.0327","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Existing data on tranexamic acid (TXA) in rhinoplasty are mixed. Objective: Compare blood loss, edema, and bruising in patients undergoing septorhinoplasty with or without intravenous (IV) TXA, measured by estimated blood loss and photograph review of edema/ecchymosis. Design: Randomized controlled trial (NCT05774717). Methods: Patients undergoing open septorhinoplasty were eligible. Participants were randomized to receive 1 g IV TXA preoperatively or routine medications only. Intraoperative bleeding was measured using the Boezaart scale and sponge saturation. Patients rated periorbital edema/ecchymosis at 1 week. Photos were reviewed by a facial plastic surgeon to grade edema/ecchymosis. Results: There were 139 participants: 73 (53%) female, mean age of 42 ± 15 years, and 13% revision procedures. Sixty-nine (50%) received TXA. Boezaart scores were 2.25 and 2.41 (p = 0.3), and sponge scores were 0.76 and 0.84 (p = 0.4) in the TXA and control groups, respectively. Postoperative edema/ecchymosis were 1.15/1.19 out of 4 in the TXA group, and 0.97/1.05 in the control group. Surgeon-graded edema/ecchymosis were 1.78/1.76 (TXA) and 1.82/1.86 (control). There was no difference in epistaxis, pain, or appearance satisfaction. Conclusions: In this study, there was no difference in bleeding, edema, ecchymosis, or postoperative experience associated with TXA.

鼻整形术静脉注射氨甲环酸:一项随机对照试验。
背景:关于氨甲环酸(TXA)在鼻整形术中的应用的现有数据是混杂的。目的:通过估计的出血量和水肿/瘀斑的照片检查来比较接受鼻中隔成形术的患者有或没有静脉注射(IV) TXA的出血量、水肿和瘀伤。设计:随机对照试验(NCT05774717)。方法:接受开放式鼻中隔成形术的患者均符合条件。参与者被随机分为术前接受1克静脉TXA或仅接受常规药物治疗。术中出血量采用Boezaart比例尺和海绵饱和度测定。患者在1周时评定眼眶周围水肿/瘀斑。面部整形外科医生检查了照片,对水肿/瘀斑进行分级。结果:139名参与者:73名(53%)女性,平均年龄42±15岁,13%的人进行了翻修。69例(50%)接受了TXA治疗。TXA组和对照组Boezaart评分分别为2.25和2.41 (p = 0.3), sponge评分分别为0.76和0.84 (p = 0.4)。TXA组术后水肿/瘀斑为1.15/1.19 / 4,对照组为0.97/1.05。手术分级的水肿/瘀斑分别为1.78/1.76 (TXA)和1.82/1.86(对照组)。在鼻出血、疼痛或外观满意度方面没有差异。结论:在这项研究中,与TXA相关的出血、水肿、瘀斑或术后经历没有差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
30.00%
发文量
159
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信