Landscape Analysis of Emergency Medicine Residency Education on Domestic Violence.

IF 2 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Alana Harp, Michelle A Gimenez, Adrené Garabedian, Maria Alejandra Ruiz, Jennifer A Newberry
{"title":"Landscape Analysis of Emergency Medicine Residency Education on Domestic Violence.","authors":"Alana Harp, Michelle A Gimenez, Adrené Garabedian, Maria Alejandra Ruiz, Jennifer A Newberry","doi":"10.1177/23821205251324010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Domestic violence (DV) is a public health problem in the United States. Emergency physicians are often the first providers to see patients needing acute care for injuries sustained secondary to DV and are an important part of the healthcare workforce for underserved populations seeking help. While much has been published about the need for better identification and care of this population, little is known about the current prevalence and characterization of DV curricula in accredited emergency medicine residency programs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cross-section survey of program directors sent to 232 Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-accredited emergency medicine residency programs to learn about the presence, content, format, and barriers related to implementation of DV curriculum in their residency programs. The survey was open from May to June 2022.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 63 programs responded (response rate: 26%). In total, 84% of programs reported having some form of DV curriculum, with the majority of respondents (81%) offering 1-5 h of content. Most programs included content on intimate partner violence (92%), child abuse (91%), and human trafficking (91%), but only 79% of programs had content on elder abuse. The most common modalities of DV curriculum implementation were didactic lectures (98%) and bedside teaching (51%). In total, 20.5% of 3-year programs had no DV curricula, while 44% of programs planned to implement improvements to their curriculum. The most common barriers to implementing additional education or further strengthening DV curriculum were lack of time in curriculum (69%) and lack of expertise in faculty (25%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The majority of residency program respondents offer some formal DV curriculum with variation in the delivery modality and curriculum time dedicated to DV. There are existing solutions to address the barriers faced by the many programs that hope to improve their DV curriculum. Creative solutions, such as incorporating non-emergency medicine lectures or supporting faculty in bedside teaching, could help residencies meet the American College of Emergency Physician recommendation for integrating the DV curriculum into emergency medicine training.</p>","PeriodicalId":45121,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development","volume":"12 ","pages":"23821205251324010"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11877464/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23821205251324010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Domestic violence (DV) is a public health problem in the United States. Emergency physicians are often the first providers to see patients needing acute care for injuries sustained secondary to DV and are an important part of the healthcare workforce for underserved populations seeking help. While much has been published about the need for better identification and care of this population, little is known about the current prevalence and characterization of DV curricula in accredited emergency medicine residency programs.

Methods: Cross-section survey of program directors sent to 232 Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-accredited emergency medicine residency programs to learn about the presence, content, format, and barriers related to implementation of DV curriculum in their residency programs. The survey was open from May to June 2022.

Results: A total of 63 programs responded (response rate: 26%). In total, 84% of programs reported having some form of DV curriculum, with the majority of respondents (81%) offering 1-5 h of content. Most programs included content on intimate partner violence (92%), child abuse (91%), and human trafficking (91%), but only 79% of programs had content on elder abuse. The most common modalities of DV curriculum implementation were didactic lectures (98%) and bedside teaching (51%). In total, 20.5% of 3-year programs had no DV curricula, while 44% of programs planned to implement improvements to their curriculum. The most common barriers to implementing additional education or further strengthening DV curriculum were lack of time in curriculum (69%) and lack of expertise in faculty (25%).

Conclusions: The majority of residency program respondents offer some formal DV curriculum with variation in the delivery modality and curriculum time dedicated to DV. There are existing solutions to address the barriers faced by the many programs that hope to improve their DV curriculum. Creative solutions, such as incorporating non-emergency medicine lectures or supporting faculty in bedside teaching, could help residencies meet the American College of Emergency Physician recommendation for integrating the DV curriculum into emergency medicine training.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development
Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
62
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信