Facial cooling improves thermal perceptions and maintains the interleukin-6 response during passive heating: A sex comparison.

Q1 Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Temperature Pub Date : 2024-09-26 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1080/23328940.2024.2406730
Yunuo Su, Emma O'Donnell, Sven P Hoekstra, Christof A Leicht
{"title":"Facial cooling improves thermal perceptions and maintains the interleukin-6 response during passive heating: A sex comparison.","authors":"Yunuo Su, Emma O'Donnell, Sven P Hoekstra, Christof A Leicht","doi":"10.1080/23328940.2024.2406730","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Passively elevating body temperature can trigger a potentially beneficial acute inflammatory response. However, heat therapy often causes discomfort and negative thermal perceptions, particularly in females who generally have lower heat tolerance than males. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of facial cooling on thermal comfort and interleukin-6 concentration in response to 60 minutes of dry heat exposure, and to investigate sex differences in physiological responses and perceptions. 22 healthy young adults (10 females, 12 males; age: 24.4 ± 3.3 years) completed three trials in randomized order using a dry sauna device: 1) Hyperthermia (71.1 ± 1.9°C; HEAT), 2) Hyperthermia with facial cooling via fans (71.1 ± 3.0°C; FAN), and 3) Normothermia (27.0 ± 0.9°C; CON). Blood samples to determine interleukin-6 (IL-6) plasma concentration were collected before and after exposure; basic affect and thermal comfort, rectal and skin temperature were assessed throughout the intervention. Rectal temperature following HEAT (38.0 ± 0.3°C) and FAN (37.8 ± 0.3°C) did not differ between males and females (<i>p</i> = 0.57). Females had higher forehead skin temperatures than males (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.019). Thermal comfort remained more positive in FAN compared to HEAT (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.002). Females felt more thermal discomfort than males in HEAT (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.03), but not in FAN (<i>p</i> = 0.28). The increase in IL-6 plasma concentration was similar between HEAT and FAN (<i>p</i> = 1.00), and higher than CON (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.02); there was no difference between males and females (<i>p</i> = 0.69). This study showed that facial cooling alleviated the thermal discomfort during heat exposure, particularly benefitted females, and did not impede the acute IL-6 response.</p>","PeriodicalId":36837,"journal":{"name":"Temperature","volume":"12 1","pages":"40-54"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11875509/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Temperature","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23328940.2024.2406730","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Passively elevating body temperature can trigger a potentially beneficial acute inflammatory response. However, heat therapy often causes discomfort and negative thermal perceptions, particularly in females who generally have lower heat tolerance than males. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of facial cooling on thermal comfort and interleukin-6 concentration in response to 60 minutes of dry heat exposure, and to investigate sex differences in physiological responses and perceptions. 22 healthy young adults (10 females, 12 males; age: 24.4 ± 3.3 years) completed three trials in randomized order using a dry sauna device: 1) Hyperthermia (71.1 ± 1.9°C; HEAT), 2) Hyperthermia with facial cooling via fans (71.1 ± 3.0°C; FAN), and 3) Normothermia (27.0 ± 0.9°C; CON). Blood samples to determine interleukin-6 (IL-6) plasma concentration were collected before and after exposure; basic affect and thermal comfort, rectal and skin temperature were assessed throughout the intervention. Rectal temperature following HEAT (38.0 ± 0.3°C) and FAN (37.8 ± 0.3°C) did not differ between males and females (p = 0.57). Females had higher forehead skin temperatures than males (p ≤ 0.019). Thermal comfort remained more positive in FAN compared to HEAT (p ≤ 0.002). Females felt more thermal discomfort than males in HEAT (p ≤ 0.03), but not in FAN (p = 0.28). The increase in IL-6 plasma concentration was similar between HEAT and FAN (p = 1.00), and higher than CON (p ≤ 0.02); there was no difference between males and females (p = 0.69). This study showed that facial cooling alleviated the thermal discomfort during heat exposure, particularly benefitted females, and did not impede the acute IL-6 response.

在被动加热过程中,面部冷却改善热感知并维持白介素-6反应:一项性别比较。
被动地升高体温可以引发潜在的有益的急性炎症反应。然而,热疗通常会引起不适和负面的热感知,特别是在通常比男性耐热性低的女性中。本研究旨在评估面部冷却对60分钟干热暴露后热舒适和白细胞介素-6浓度的影响,并探讨生理反应和感知的性别差异。22名健康青年(10名女性,12名男性;年龄:24.4±3.3岁)使用干桑拿装置随机完成三项试验:1)热疗(71.1±1.9°C;2)通过风扇进行面部降温的热疗(71.1±3.0℃;3)常温(27.0±0.9°C;CON)。暴露前后采集血样测定白细胞介素-6 (IL-6)血浆浓度;在整个干预过程中评估基本影响和热舒适,直肠和皮肤温度。男性和女性在HEAT(38.0±0.3°C)和FAN(37.8±0.3°C)后的直肠温度无差异(p = 0.57)。女性额头皮肤温度高于男性(p≤0.019)。与HEAT相比,FAN组的热舒适更积极(p≤0.002)。女性在HEAT (p≤0.03)上的热不适感大于男性(p = 0.28),而在FAN (p = 0.28)上则没有。IL-6血浆浓度升高在HEAT组和FAN组之间相似(p = 1.00),且高于CON组(p≤0.02);男女间无差异(p = 0.69)。本研究表明,面部冷却减轻了热暴露时的热不适,特别是对女性有益,并且不阻碍急性IL-6反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Temperature
Temperature Medicine-Physiology (medical)
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信