Clinical evaluation of the decentration in different designs of scleral lenses.

IF 4.1 3区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Ana Privado-Aroco, María Serramito, Gonzalo Valdes-Soria, María Romaguera, Alvaro Cuellar, Mohamed Filali, Cristina Pastrana, Gonzalo Carracedo
{"title":"Clinical evaluation of the decentration in different designs of scleral lenses.","authors":"Ana Privado-Aroco, María Serramito, Gonzalo Valdes-Soria, María Romaguera, Alvaro Cuellar, Mohamed Filali, Cristina Pastrana, Gonzalo Carracedo","doi":"10.1016/j.clae.2025.102391","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To validate a simple and highly repeatable method of measuring the displacement of scleral lenses from the pupillary center and to quantify scleral lens decentration of two different designs of scleral lens landing zones: spheric (SLZ) and toric (TLZ), with the validated method.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective crossover study has been performed. Twenty patients (26.90 ± 3.03) with regular corneas participated voluntarily in the study and SLZ and TLZ landing zone Onefit™ MED scleral lenses were fitted. This study was divided into 2 phases. In the first phase, the validation of a new technique, using an image processing tool through the Matlab_R2017b software, to measure decentration was performed, compared with a subjective method consisting of a millimetric grid located in one of the slit lamp eyepieces. Intersession and interobserver repeatability were evaluated in the vertical and horizontal measurements of decentration with both methods. Once the best and higher repeatable method to assess decentration was found, phase 2 started and decentration of two different landing zone designs of scleral lenses were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the first phase, Matlab methodology for decentration analysis showed high repeatability for both horizontal and vertical axes (ICC ≥ 0.9), whereas the slit lamp method demonstrated lower repeatability (ICC < 0.5). Second phase showed a significant reduction in decentration after two hours of wear with TLZ design (p < 0.001), unlike the SLZ design, which had no significant changes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The measurement of contact lens decentration by image processing using the Matlab software showed a high intersubject and intersession repeatability. SLZ tends to decenter inferiorly and temporarily. A toric landing zone design allows better centration but does not completely reduce the problem of decentration in either the vertical or horizontal axis.</p>","PeriodicalId":49087,"journal":{"name":"Contact Lens & Anterior Eye","volume":" ","pages":"102391"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contact Lens & Anterior Eye","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clae.2025.102391","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To validate a simple and highly repeatable method of measuring the displacement of scleral lenses from the pupillary center and to quantify scleral lens decentration of two different designs of scleral lens landing zones: spheric (SLZ) and toric (TLZ), with the validated method.

Methods: A prospective crossover study has been performed. Twenty patients (26.90 ± 3.03) with regular corneas participated voluntarily in the study and SLZ and TLZ landing zone Onefit™ MED scleral lenses were fitted. This study was divided into 2 phases. In the first phase, the validation of a new technique, using an image processing tool through the Matlab_R2017b software, to measure decentration was performed, compared with a subjective method consisting of a millimetric grid located in one of the slit lamp eyepieces. Intersession and interobserver repeatability were evaluated in the vertical and horizontal measurements of decentration with both methods. Once the best and higher repeatable method to assess decentration was found, phase 2 started and decentration of two different landing zone designs of scleral lenses were evaluated.

Results: In the first phase, Matlab methodology for decentration analysis showed high repeatability for both horizontal and vertical axes (ICC ≥ 0.9), whereas the slit lamp method demonstrated lower repeatability (ICC < 0.5). Second phase showed a significant reduction in decentration after two hours of wear with TLZ design (p < 0.001), unlike the SLZ design, which had no significant changes.

Conclusion: The measurement of contact lens decentration by image processing using the Matlab software showed a high intersubject and intersession repeatability. SLZ tends to decenter inferiorly and temporarily. A toric landing zone design allows better centration but does not completely reduce the problem of decentration in either the vertical or horizontal axis.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
18.80%
发文量
198
审稿时长
55 days
期刊介绍: Contact Lens & Anterior Eye is a research-based journal covering all aspects of contact lens theory and practice, including original articles on invention and innovations, as well as the regular features of: Case Reports; Literary Reviews; Editorials; Instrumentation and Techniques and Dates of Professional Meetings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信