Gauthier Pellegrin, Nicolas Ricka, Denis A Fompeyrine, Thomas Rohaly, Leah Enders, Heather Roy
{"title":"Assessment of PTSD in military personnel via machine learning based on physiological habituation in a virtual immersive environment.","authors":"Gauthier Pellegrin, Nicolas Ricka, Denis A Fompeyrine, Thomas Rohaly, Leah Enders, Heather Roy","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-91916-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a complex mental health condition triggered by exposure to traumatic events that leads to physical health problems and socioeconomic impairments. Although the complex symptomatology of PTSD makes diagnosis difficult, early identification and intervention are crucial to mitigate the long-term effects of PTSD and provide appropriate treatment. In this study, we explored the potential for physiological habituation to stressful events to predict PTSD status. We used passive physiological data collected from 21 active-duty United States military personnel and veterans in an immersive virtual environment with high-stress combat-related conditions involving trigger events such as explosions or flashbangs. In our work, we proposed a quantitative measure of habituation to stressful events that can be quantitatively estimated through physiological data such as heart rate, galvanic skin response and eye blinking. Using a Gaussian process classifier, we prove that habituation to stressful events is a predictor of PTSD status, measured via the PTSD Checklist Military version (PCL-M). Our algorithm achieved an accuracy of 80.95% across our cohort. These findings suggest that passively collected physiological data may provide a noninvasive and objective method to identify individuals with PTSD. These physiological markers could improve both the detection and treatment of PTSD.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"7562"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11880569/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-91916-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a complex mental health condition triggered by exposure to traumatic events that leads to physical health problems and socioeconomic impairments. Although the complex symptomatology of PTSD makes diagnosis difficult, early identification and intervention are crucial to mitigate the long-term effects of PTSD and provide appropriate treatment. In this study, we explored the potential for physiological habituation to stressful events to predict PTSD status. We used passive physiological data collected from 21 active-duty United States military personnel and veterans in an immersive virtual environment with high-stress combat-related conditions involving trigger events such as explosions or flashbangs. In our work, we proposed a quantitative measure of habituation to stressful events that can be quantitatively estimated through physiological data such as heart rate, galvanic skin response and eye blinking. Using a Gaussian process classifier, we prove that habituation to stressful events is a predictor of PTSD status, measured via the PTSD Checklist Military version (PCL-M). Our algorithm achieved an accuracy of 80.95% across our cohort. These findings suggest that passively collected physiological data may provide a noninvasive and objective method to identify individuals with PTSD. These physiological markers could improve both the detection and treatment of PTSD.
期刊介绍:
We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections.
Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021).
•Engineering
Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live.
•Physical sciences
Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics.
•Earth and environmental sciences
Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems.
•Biological sciences
Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants.
•Health sciences
The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.