Rahman Shiri, Joonas Poutanen, Mikko Härmä, Jenni Ervasti, Eija Haukka
{"title":"A meta-analysis of unemployment risk factors for middle-aged workers.","authors":"Rahman Shiri, Joonas Poutanen, Mikko Härmä, Jenni Ervasti, Eija Haukka","doi":"10.5271/sjweh.4216","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to identify risk factors for unemployment among middle-aged workers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Searches were carried out in PubMed, Web of Science and Google Scholar until November 2024, focusing on observational longitudinal studies that involved workers aged 40-64 years. Three reviewers evaluated the quality of the studies. A random-effects meta-analysis was employed, and heterogeneity and publication bias were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 10 432 reports, 19 longitudinal studies (N=374 585 participants) were included in the review. The meta-analysis identified multiple risk factors associated with unemployment, including suboptimal self-rated general health [hazard ratio (HR) 1.44, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.21-1.70], mental health conditions [HR 1.48, 95% CI 1.30-1.68, particularly depressive symptoms (HR 1.42, 95% CI 1.14-1.76)], low job control (HR 1.30, 95% CI 1.17-1.43), and lack of physical activity (HR 1.56, 95% CI 1.13-2.15). Additionally, a higher risk of unemployment was observed among individuals with ≤12 years of education (HR 1.17, 95% CI 1.00-1.36), those who are unmarried, separated, or widowed (HR 1.43, 95% CI 1.14-1.79), and immigrants (HR 1.26, 95% CI 1.11-1.44). Age, gender, smoking, alcohol consumption, musculoskeletal disorders, cardiovascular and respiratory diseases, digestive diseases, diabetes, neoplasm, and limitations in daily activities did not increase unemployment risk.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This meta-analysis highlights the impact of mental health conditions, low job control, and lack of leisure-time physical activity on unemployment risk among middle-aged workers. Interventions aimed at improving mental health and increasing job control and physical activity could reduce unemployment risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":21528,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health","volume":" ","pages":"135-145"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12068247/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.4216","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to identify risk factors for unemployment among middle-aged workers.
Methods: Searches were carried out in PubMed, Web of Science and Google Scholar until November 2024, focusing on observational longitudinal studies that involved workers aged 40-64 years. Three reviewers evaluated the quality of the studies. A random-effects meta-analysis was employed, and heterogeneity and publication bias were assessed.
Results: Out of 10 432 reports, 19 longitudinal studies (N=374 585 participants) were included in the review. The meta-analysis identified multiple risk factors associated with unemployment, including suboptimal self-rated general health [hazard ratio (HR) 1.44, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.21-1.70], mental health conditions [HR 1.48, 95% CI 1.30-1.68, particularly depressive symptoms (HR 1.42, 95% CI 1.14-1.76)], low job control (HR 1.30, 95% CI 1.17-1.43), and lack of physical activity (HR 1.56, 95% CI 1.13-2.15). Additionally, a higher risk of unemployment was observed among individuals with ≤12 years of education (HR 1.17, 95% CI 1.00-1.36), those who are unmarried, separated, or widowed (HR 1.43, 95% CI 1.14-1.79), and immigrants (HR 1.26, 95% CI 1.11-1.44). Age, gender, smoking, alcohol consumption, musculoskeletal disorders, cardiovascular and respiratory diseases, digestive diseases, diabetes, neoplasm, and limitations in daily activities did not increase unemployment risk.
Conclusions: This meta-analysis highlights the impact of mental health conditions, low job control, and lack of leisure-time physical activity on unemployment risk among middle-aged workers. Interventions aimed at improving mental health and increasing job control and physical activity could reduce unemployment risk.
目的:本系统回顾和荟萃分析旨在确定中年工人失业的危险因素。方法:在PubMed, Web of Science和b谷歌Scholar中进行检索,直到2024年11月,重点关注涉及40-64岁工人的观察性纵向研究。三位审稿人评估了研究的质量。采用随机效应荟萃分析,评估异质性和发表偏倚。结果:在10432份报告中,19项纵向研究(N= 374585名参与者)被纳入本综述。荟萃分析确定了与失业相关的多种风险因素,包括自评一般健康状况不佳[风险比(HR) 1.44, 95%置信区间(CI) 1.21-1.70]、精神健康状况[HR 1.48, 95% CI 1.30-1.68,尤其是抑郁症状(HR 1.42, 95% CI 1.14-1.76)]、工作控制力低(HR 1.30, 95% CI 1.17-1.43)和缺乏体育活动(HR 1.56, 95% CI 1.13-2.15)。此外,在受教育程度≤12年(HR 1.17, 95% CI 1.00-1.36)、未婚、分居或丧偶(HR 1.43, 95% CI 1.14-1.79)和移民(HR 1.26, 95% CI 1.11-1.44)中,失业风险较高。年龄、性别、吸烟、饮酒、肌肉骨骼疾病、心血管和呼吸系统疾病、消化系统疾病、糖尿病、肿瘤和日常活动受限不会增加失业风险。结论:本荟萃分析强调了中年工人的心理健康状况、低工作控制和缺乏闲暇时间体育活动对失业风险的影响。旨在改善心理健康、增加工作控制和身体活动的干预措施可以降低失业风险。
期刊介绍:
The aim of the Journal is to promote research in the fields of occupational and environmental health and safety and to increase knowledge through the publication of original research articles, systematic reviews, and other information of high interest. Areas of interest include occupational and environmental epidemiology, occupational and environmental medicine, psychosocial factors at work, physical work load, physical activity work-related mental and musculoskeletal problems, aging, work ability and return to work, working hours and health, occupational hygiene and toxicology, work safety and injury epidemiology as well as occupational health services. In addition to observational studies, quasi-experimental and intervention studies are welcome as well as methodological papers, occupational cohort profiles, and studies associated with economic evaluation. The Journal also publishes short communications, case reports, commentaries, discussion papers, clinical questions, consensus reports, meeting reports, other reports, book reviews, news, and announcements (jobs, courses, events etc).