The ethics of theft: Reevaluating the impacts of floral larceny on plant reproductive success.

IF 6.3 1区 生物学 Q1 PLANT SCIENCES
Plant Diversity Pub Date : 2024-12-20 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.pld.2024.12.004
Jin-Ru Zhong, Xiao-Fang Jin, Michael C Orr, Xiao-Qing Li, Yong-Deng He, Sheng-Wei Wang, Qing-Feng Wang, Chun-Feng Yang, Zhong-Ming Ye
{"title":"The ethics of theft: Reevaluating the impacts of floral larceny on plant reproductive success.","authors":"Jin-Ru Zhong, Xiao-Fang Jin, Michael C Orr, Xiao-Qing Li, Yong-Deng He, Sheng-Wei Wang, Qing-Feng Wang, Chun-Feng Yang, Zhong-Ming Ye","doi":"10.1016/j.pld.2024.12.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Plants and their interaction partners offer unparalleled views of evolutionary ecology. Nectar larceny, entailing nectar extraction without pollinating, is thought to be an example of a harmful, antagonistic behavior, but the precise consequences of floral larceny on plant reproductive success remain contentious. We conducted a comprehensive meta-analysis of 153 studies across 120 plant species, using 14 moderators to assess the effects of floral larceny on plant reproductive success and examine the key moderators. We found that floral larceny negatively impacts flower traits, pollinator visitation, pollen deposition, and fruit set, while having a neutral effect on critical female fitness indicators, such as seed set and seed quality, as well as on male fitness. By altering pollinator behavior, floral larceny may reduce geitonogamy, potentially enhancing genetic diversity. Additionally, factors such as pollinator type, plant mating system, and pollen limitation were identified as key moderators of these effects. Our analysis reveals an ultimately neutral effect of floral larceny on plant reproductive success, with potential benefits in certain contexts. These findings suggest that floral larceny plays a complex and multifaceted role within plant-pollinator interactions, facilitating the evolutionary stability and coexistence of floral larcenists and host plants.</p>","PeriodicalId":20224,"journal":{"name":"Plant Diversity","volume":"47 1","pages":"148-158"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11873629/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plant Diversity","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pld.2024.12.004","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Plants and their interaction partners offer unparalleled views of evolutionary ecology. Nectar larceny, entailing nectar extraction without pollinating, is thought to be an example of a harmful, antagonistic behavior, but the precise consequences of floral larceny on plant reproductive success remain contentious. We conducted a comprehensive meta-analysis of 153 studies across 120 plant species, using 14 moderators to assess the effects of floral larceny on plant reproductive success and examine the key moderators. We found that floral larceny negatively impacts flower traits, pollinator visitation, pollen deposition, and fruit set, while having a neutral effect on critical female fitness indicators, such as seed set and seed quality, as well as on male fitness. By altering pollinator behavior, floral larceny may reduce geitonogamy, potentially enhancing genetic diversity. Additionally, factors such as pollinator type, plant mating system, and pollen limitation were identified as key moderators of these effects. Our analysis reveals an ultimately neutral effect of floral larceny on plant reproductive success, with potential benefits in certain contexts. These findings suggest that floral larceny plays a complex and multifaceted role within plant-pollinator interactions, facilitating the evolutionary stability and coexistence of floral larcenists and host plants.

偷窃的道德:重新评估花卉盗窃对植物繁殖成功的影响。
植物及其相互作用的伙伴为进化生态学提供了无与伦比的视角。花蜜盗窃,即在不授粉的情况下提取花蜜,被认为是一种有害的、敌对的行为,但花蜜盗窃对植物繁殖成功的确切后果仍然存在争议。我们对120种植物的153项研究进行了综合荟萃分析,使用14种调节因子来评估花盗窃对植物繁殖成功的影响,并检查了关键调节因子。研究发现,盗花对花性状、传粉者访花、花粉沉积和坐果均有负向影响,而对坐果、品质等关键雌体适应度指标和雄体适应度的影响为中性。通过改变传粉者的行为,偷花可能会减少雌雄同体,潜在地增强遗传多样性。此外,传粉者类型、植物交配系统和花粉限制等因素是这些影响的关键调节因子。我们的分析揭示了花卉盗窃对植物繁殖成功的最终中性影响,在某些情况下具有潜在的益处。这些发现表明,植物窃花在植物与传粉者的相互作用中起着复杂而多方面的作用,促进了植物窃花者与寄主植物的进化稳定性和共存。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Plant Diversity
Plant Diversity Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
1863
审稿时长
35 days
期刊介绍: Plant Diversity (formerly Plant Diversity and Resources) is an international plant science journal that publishes substantial original research and review papers that advance our understanding of the past and current distribution of plants, contribute to the development of more phylogenetically accurate taxonomic classifications, present new findings on or insights into evolutionary processes and mechanisms that are of interest to the community of plant systematic and evolutionary biologists. While the focus of the journal is on biodiversity, ecology and evolution of East Asian flora, it is not limited to these topics. Applied evolutionary issues, such as climate change and conservation biology, are welcome, especially if they address conceptual problems. Theoretical papers are equally welcome. Preference is given to concise, clearly written papers focusing on precisely framed questions or hypotheses. Papers that are purely descriptive have a low chance of acceptance. Fields covered by the journal include: plant systematics and taxonomy- evolutionary developmental biology- reproductive biology- phylo- and biogeography- evolutionary ecology- population biology- conservation biology- palaeobotany- molecular evolution- comparative and evolutionary genomics- physiology- biochemistry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信