Considerations for Regulatory Reusability of Dynamic Tools in the New Drug Development.

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Pharmaceutical Research Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-04 DOI:10.1007/s11095-025-03831-5
Jiang Liu, Yuching Yang, Joga Gobburu, Cynthia J Musante, Martin Klein, Liang Zhao, Rajanikanth Madabushi, Hao Zhu
{"title":"Considerations for Regulatory Reusability of Dynamic Tools in the New Drug Development.","authors":"Jiang Liu, Yuching Yang, Joga Gobburu, Cynthia J Musante, Martin Klein, Liang Zhao, Rajanikanth Madabushi, Hao Zhu","doi":"10.1007/s11095-025-03831-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Model-informed drug development (MIDD) approaches have become indispensable for new drug development and to address regulatory challenges. Dynamic tools, such as population pharmacokinetics (popPK), physiologically-based pharmacokinetics (PBPK), and quantitative systems pharmacology (QSP) models, are routinely employed to enhance the efficiency of drug development. Recently, the Fit-for-Purpose (FFP) initiative and the Model Master File (MMF) framework have emerged to support model reusability and sharing in regulatory settings. In this manuscript we share key insights from the Session \"Pathways for Regulatory Acceptance of Dynamic Tools in the New Drug Space\" of Workshop \"Considerations and Potential Regulatory Applications for a Model Master File\", hosted by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Center for Research on Complex Generics (CRCG) and discuss the considerations for regulatory acceptance of dynamic modeling tools. Presentations at the workshop explored current practices in PBPK model evaluation, the potential for popPK models in bioequivalence (BE) assessments, and the implications of reusing models. Challenges such as context-specific validation, version control, and the impact of scientific and technological advancements on model reuse were emphasized. The workshop underscored the importance of clear regulatory pathways and structured frameworks for the consistent application of reusable models. The MMF's potential to streamline reviews and reduce redundancies was noted, although operational details require further elaboration. Continued collaboration among stakeholders is essential to refine model-sharing practices, enhance model validation processes, and promote transparency, ensuring that MIDD approaches remain robust and adaptable to evolving regulatory needs.</p>","PeriodicalId":20027,"journal":{"name":"Pharmaceutical Research","volume":" ","pages":"765-771"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12158829/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmaceutical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11095-025-03831-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Model-informed drug development (MIDD) approaches have become indispensable for new drug development and to address regulatory challenges. Dynamic tools, such as population pharmacokinetics (popPK), physiologically-based pharmacokinetics (PBPK), and quantitative systems pharmacology (QSP) models, are routinely employed to enhance the efficiency of drug development. Recently, the Fit-for-Purpose (FFP) initiative and the Model Master File (MMF) framework have emerged to support model reusability and sharing in regulatory settings. In this manuscript we share key insights from the Session "Pathways for Regulatory Acceptance of Dynamic Tools in the New Drug Space" of Workshop "Considerations and Potential Regulatory Applications for a Model Master File", hosted by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Center for Research on Complex Generics (CRCG) and discuss the considerations for regulatory acceptance of dynamic modeling tools. Presentations at the workshop explored current practices in PBPK model evaluation, the potential for popPK models in bioequivalence (BE) assessments, and the implications of reusing models. Challenges such as context-specific validation, version control, and the impact of scientific and technological advancements on model reuse were emphasized. The workshop underscored the importance of clear regulatory pathways and structured frameworks for the consistent application of reusable models. The MMF's potential to streamline reviews and reduce redundancies was noted, although operational details require further elaboration. Continued collaboration among stakeholders is essential to refine model-sharing practices, enhance model validation processes, and promote transparency, ensuring that MIDD approaches remain robust and adaptable to evolving regulatory needs.

新药开发中动态工具监管可重用性的考虑。
基于模型的药物开发(MIDD)方法已经成为新药开发和解决监管挑战不可或缺的方法。动态工具,如群体药代动力学(popPK)、基于生理的药代动力学(PBPK)和定量系统药理学(QSP)模型,通常用于提高药物开发效率。最近,出现了适合目的(FFP)倡议和模型主文件(MMF)框架,以支持模型的可重用性和监管环境中的共享。在本文中,我们分享了由美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)和复杂仿制药研究中心(CRCG)主办的“模型主文件的考虑因素和潜在监管应用”研讨会“新药领域动态工具的监管接受途径”的关键见解,并讨论了监管接受动态建模工具的考虑因素。研讨会上的演讲探讨了PBPK模型评估的当前实践,popPK模型在生物等效性(BE)评估中的潜力,以及重复使用模型的含义。强调了诸如特定于上下文的验证、版本控制以及科学和技术进步对模型重用的影响等挑战。讲习班强调了明确的管理途径和结构化框架对于一致地应用可重用模型的重要性。人们注意到MMF在精简审查和减少冗余方面的潜力,尽管业务细节需要进一步阐述。利益相关者之间的持续合作对于完善模型共享实践、加强模型验证流程和提高透明度至关重要,从而确保MIDD方法保持稳健并适应不断变化的监管需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pharmaceutical Research
Pharmaceutical Research 医学-化学综合
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
5.40%
发文量
276
审稿时长
3.4 months
期刊介绍: Pharmaceutical Research, an official journal of the American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists, is committed to publishing novel research that is mechanism-based, hypothesis-driven and addresses significant issues in drug discovery, development and regulation. Current areas of interest include, but are not limited to: -(pre)formulation engineering and processing- computational biopharmaceutics- drug delivery and targeting- molecular biopharmaceutics and drug disposition (including cellular and molecular pharmacology)- pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and pharmacogenetics. Research may involve nonclinical and clinical studies, and utilize both in vitro and in vivo approaches. Studies on small drug molecules, pharmaceutical solid materials (including biomaterials, polymers and nanoparticles) biotechnology products (including genes, peptides, proteins and vaccines), and genetically engineered cells are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信