Evaluation of Dual Use: Real Time Reductions in Combustible Cigarette Smoking During Co-Occurring Use of E-Cigarettes A Secondary Analysis of a Naturalistic Randomized Clinical Trial.

IF 3 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Matthew J Carpenter, Tracy T Smith, Kyle J Walters, Amy E Wahlquist, Katelyn R Koval, Elias M Klemperer
{"title":"Evaluation of Dual Use: Real Time Reductions in Combustible Cigarette Smoking During Co-Occurring Use of E-Cigarettes A Secondary Analysis of a Naturalistic Randomized Clinical Trial.","authors":"Matthew J Carpenter, Tracy T Smith, Kyle J Walters, Amy E Wahlquist, Katelyn R Koval, Elias M Klemperer","doi":"10.1093/ntr/ntaf055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The pattern and trajectory of dual use are critical to differentiating it as a health benefit vs. harm.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Based within a large, naturalistic randomized controlled trial of e-cigarette in the U.S., adults who smoke were given a 1-month sample of tank-style e-cigarette to use as they wish (n=427) or not (n=211). Analyses are restricted to participants from the e-cigarette group who became dual users by one month (DU; n=315) vs. participants in control group who exclusively used combustible cigarettes (EUCC; n=182). Primary outcomes are based on changes in combustible cigarette smoking (cigarettes per day; CPD) across daily diaries within sampling period, and at 3 and 6-month follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>DUs reported significantly more diary days of large smoking reduction (smoking 1-50% of baseline CPD: 23.1% of all diary days) and not smoking (5.6% of all diary days) than did EUCCs (6.8% and 1.4%, respectively) during sampling period (p's < .001). Among DUs, 18.4% reported smoking 1-50% of baseline CPD and 9.5% were not smoking at Week 12; 17.5% reported smoking 1-50% of baseline CPD and 9.2% were not smoking at Week 24. In contrast, among EUCCs, 7.1% reported 1-50% of baseline CPD at Week 12 and 1.7% were not smoking. At Week 24, 8.2% reported 1-50% of baseline CPD and 7.1% were not smoking. Among DUs, e-cigarette use days were associated with greater probability of non-smoking days (8%) than non-e-cigarette use days (3%, p <.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared to continued cigarette smoking, initiating dual use reduced smoking and increased cigarette-free days.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>Contrary to some claims that dual use of combustible and e-cigarettes may perpetuate or even increase harmful exposure, evidence from the current analyses, collected in real time as dual use unfolds, suggest that dual use leads to significant and sustained reductions in cigarette smoking.</p>","PeriodicalId":19241,"journal":{"name":"Nicotine & Tobacco Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nicotine & Tobacco Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntaf055","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The pattern and trajectory of dual use are critical to differentiating it as a health benefit vs. harm.

Methods: Based within a large, naturalistic randomized controlled trial of e-cigarette in the U.S., adults who smoke were given a 1-month sample of tank-style e-cigarette to use as they wish (n=427) or not (n=211). Analyses are restricted to participants from the e-cigarette group who became dual users by one month (DU; n=315) vs. participants in control group who exclusively used combustible cigarettes (EUCC; n=182). Primary outcomes are based on changes in combustible cigarette smoking (cigarettes per day; CPD) across daily diaries within sampling period, and at 3 and 6-month follow-up.

Results: DUs reported significantly more diary days of large smoking reduction (smoking 1-50% of baseline CPD: 23.1% of all diary days) and not smoking (5.6% of all diary days) than did EUCCs (6.8% and 1.4%, respectively) during sampling period (p's < .001). Among DUs, 18.4% reported smoking 1-50% of baseline CPD and 9.5% were not smoking at Week 12; 17.5% reported smoking 1-50% of baseline CPD and 9.2% were not smoking at Week 24. In contrast, among EUCCs, 7.1% reported 1-50% of baseline CPD at Week 12 and 1.7% were not smoking. At Week 24, 8.2% reported 1-50% of baseline CPD and 7.1% were not smoking. Among DUs, e-cigarette use days were associated with greater probability of non-smoking days (8%) than non-e-cigarette use days (3%, p <.001).

Conclusion: Compared to continued cigarette smoking, initiating dual use reduced smoking and increased cigarette-free days.

Implications: Contrary to some claims that dual use of combustible and e-cigarettes may perpetuate or even increase harmful exposure, evidence from the current analyses, collected in real time as dual use unfolds, suggest that dual use leads to significant and sustained reductions in cigarette smoking.

双重用途评估:在同时使用电子烟期间可燃香烟吸烟的实时减少:一项自然随机临床试验的二次分析。
导言:双重用途的模式和轨迹对于区分其对健康的益处和危害至关重要。方法:在美国进行的一项大型自然随机对照电子烟试验中,吸烟的成年人获得了一个月的罐式电子烟样本,可以随意使用(n=427)或不使用(n=211)。分析仅限于电子烟组的参与者,他们在一个月后成为双重用户(DU;n=315)与只使用可燃香烟的对照组(EUCC;n = 182)。主要结果基于可燃香烟吸烟的变化(每天吸烟数;CPD)在抽样期间的日常日记中,以及在3个月和6个月的随访。结果:在抽样期间,DUs报告的大量吸烟减少(吸烟占基线CPD的1-50%:占所有日记日的23.1%)和不吸烟(占所有日记日的5.6%)的日记日明显多于EUCCs(分别为6.8%和1.4%)(p < .001)。在DUs中,18.4%报告吸烟占基线CPD的1-50%,9.5%在第12周时不吸烟;17.5%的人在第24周时吸烟,9.2%的人不吸烟。相比之下,在EUCCs中,7.1%报告第12周时基线CPD为1-50%,1.7%不吸烟。在第24周,8.2%的人报告基线CPD为1-50%,7.1%的人不吸烟。在DUs中,使用电子烟的天数比不使用电子烟的天数(3%)与不吸烟天数的可能性更大(8%)相关,p结论:与持续吸烟相比,开始双重使用减少了吸烟并增加了不吸烟的天数。影响:与一些声称可燃物和电子烟的双重使用可能会延续甚至增加有害暴露的说法相反,目前的分析证据表明,随着双重使用的展开,实时收集的证据表明,双重使用会显著和持续地减少吸烟。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nicotine & Tobacco Research
Nicotine & Tobacco Research 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
10.60%
发文量
268
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Nicotine & Tobacco Research is one of the world''s few peer-reviewed journals devoted exclusively to the study of nicotine and tobacco. It aims to provide a forum for empirical findings, critical reviews, and conceptual papers on the many aspects of nicotine and tobacco, including research from the biobehavioral, neurobiological, molecular biologic, epidemiological, prevention, and treatment arenas. Along with manuscripts from each of the areas mentioned above, the editors encourage submissions that are integrative in nature and that cross traditional disciplinary boundaries. The journal is sponsored by the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco (SRNT). It publishes twelve times a year.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信