Home-Based, Remotely Supervised Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Improves the Overall Pain Experience of Older Adults With Knee Osteoarthritis.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Pain Research & Management Pub Date : 2025-02-24 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1155/prm/1783171
Chiyoung Lee, Juyoung Park, C Kent Kwoh, Mindy Fain, Lindsey Park, Hyochol Ahn
{"title":"Home-Based, Remotely Supervised Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Improves the Overall Pain Experience of Older Adults With Knee Osteoarthritis.","authors":"Chiyoung Lee, Juyoung Park, C Kent Kwoh, Mindy Fain, Lindsey Park, Hyochol Ahn","doi":"10.1155/prm/1783171","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> Chronic pain in knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a multidimensional phenomenon requiring thorough assessment and appropriate treatment. We assessed the impact of home-based, remotely supervised transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on the overall pain experience of older adults with knee OA by simultaneously examining its effects on multiple pain domains-pain intensity, pain interference, and pain catastrophizing-using multigroup latent transition analysis (LTA). <b>Methods:</b> This secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial involved 120 participants with knee OA pain, randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive 15 daily sessions of 2-mA tDCS or sham tDCS (20 min per session) over three weeks, with real-time remote supervision. Pain intensity was measured using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) and the pain subscale of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) Index. Pain interference was measured using the WOMAC functional scale. Pain catastrophizing was assessed using the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS). All the measures were assessed at baseline and at the end of each week (weeks 1, 2, and 3), after the participants had completed five tDCS sessions per week. Multigroup LTA enabled the simultaneous measurement of multiple pain domains and analysis of their changes as a function of intervention exposure by modeling the transition probabilities of latent classes and comparing these changes between the groups. <b>Results:</b> Based on the NRS, WOMAC, and PCS scores, three latent categories were identified: \"high pain (all scores high),\" \"moderate pain (all scores moderate),\" and \"low pain (all scores low).\" Active group participants with \"moderate pain\" at baseline had a 24.2% probability of transitioning to \"low pain\" after Week 1, whereas sham group participants remained stagnant during this interval. Notably, 37.6% of active group participants with \"high pain\" at Week 1 transitioned to \"moderate pain,\" while 35.8% of those with \"moderate pain\" at Week 1 transitioned to \"low pain\" by Week 2 (after an additional five sessions). Nevertheless, no noticeable changes were observed in the sham group during this period. No pronounced intervention effects were noted by Week 3. <b>Conclusions:</b> Simultaneously modeling pain-related measures enriches our understanding of the efficacy of tDCS in improving the overall pain experience among older adults with knee OA. <b>Trial Registration:</b> ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04016272.</p>","PeriodicalId":19913,"journal":{"name":"Pain Research & Management","volume":"2025 ","pages":"1783171"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11876529/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Research & Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/prm/1783171","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Chronic pain in knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a multidimensional phenomenon requiring thorough assessment and appropriate treatment. We assessed the impact of home-based, remotely supervised transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on the overall pain experience of older adults with knee OA by simultaneously examining its effects on multiple pain domains-pain intensity, pain interference, and pain catastrophizing-using multigroup latent transition analysis (LTA). Methods: This secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial involved 120 participants with knee OA pain, randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive 15 daily sessions of 2-mA tDCS or sham tDCS (20 min per session) over three weeks, with real-time remote supervision. Pain intensity was measured using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) and the pain subscale of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) Index. Pain interference was measured using the WOMAC functional scale. Pain catastrophizing was assessed using the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS). All the measures were assessed at baseline and at the end of each week (weeks 1, 2, and 3), after the participants had completed five tDCS sessions per week. Multigroup LTA enabled the simultaneous measurement of multiple pain domains and analysis of their changes as a function of intervention exposure by modeling the transition probabilities of latent classes and comparing these changes between the groups. Results: Based on the NRS, WOMAC, and PCS scores, three latent categories were identified: "high pain (all scores high)," "moderate pain (all scores moderate)," and "low pain (all scores low)." Active group participants with "moderate pain" at baseline had a 24.2% probability of transitioning to "low pain" after Week 1, whereas sham group participants remained stagnant during this interval. Notably, 37.6% of active group participants with "high pain" at Week 1 transitioned to "moderate pain," while 35.8% of those with "moderate pain" at Week 1 transitioned to "low pain" by Week 2 (after an additional five sessions). Nevertheless, no noticeable changes were observed in the sham group during this period. No pronounced intervention effects were noted by Week 3. Conclusions: Simultaneously modeling pain-related measures enriches our understanding of the efficacy of tDCS in improving the overall pain experience among older adults with knee OA. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04016272.

基于家庭、远程监督的经颅直流电刺激改善老年膝关节骨关节炎患者的整体疼痛体验。
目的:膝骨关节炎(OA)慢性疼痛是一种多维现象,需要全面评估和适当治疗。我们评估了基于家庭、远程监督的经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)对老年膝关节OA患者整体疼痛体验的影响,同时使用多组潜在转变分析(LTA)检查了其对多个疼痛领域的影响——疼痛强度、疼痛干扰和疼痛灾难。方法:这是一项随机临床试验的二次分析,涉及120名膝关节OA疼痛的参与者,以1:1的比例随机分配,在三周内每天接受15次2-mA tDCS或假tDCS(每次20分钟),并进行实时远程监控。疼痛强度采用数值评定量表(NRS)和西安大略和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎(WOMAC)指数疼痛亚量表进行测量。疼痛干扰测量采用WOMAC功能量表。采用疼痛加重量表(PCS)评估疼痛加重程度。在基线和每周(第1、2和3周)结束时,在参与者每周完成5次tDCS后,对所有措施进行评估。多组LTA可以同时测量多个疼痛域,并通过建模潜在类别的转移概率来分析其变化作为干预暴露的函数,并比较组间的这些变化。结果:基于NRS, WOMAC和PCS评分,确定了三个潜在类别:“高疼痛(所有得分高)”,“中度疼痛(所有得分中等)”和“低疼痛(所有得分低)”。在第1周后,基线为“中度疼痛”的积极组参与者有24.2%的概率过渡到“轻度疼痛”,而假组参与者在这段时间内保持停滞。值得注意的是,37.6%的积极组参与者在第一周的“高疼痛”过渡到“中度疼痛”,而35.8%的参与者在第一周的“中度疼痛”过渡到第二周的“低疼痛”(在额外的五个疗程之后)。然而,假手术组在此期间没有观察到明显的变化。到第3周时,没有发现明显的干预效果。结论:同时,模拟疼痛相关措施丰富了我们对tDCS在改善老年膝关节OA患者整体疼痛体验方面的疗效的理解。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT04016272。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pain Research & Management
Pain Research & Management CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
109
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Pain Research and Management is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies in all areas of pain management. The most recent Impact Factor for Pain Research and Management is 1.685 according to the 2015 Journal Citation Reports released by Thomson Reuters in 2016.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信