Can an Abnormal Gastric Emptying Study Be Normal?

IF 1 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Ben Freiberg
{"title":"Can an Abnormal Gastric Emptying Study Be Normal?","authors":"Ben Freiberg","doi":"10.2967/jnmt.124.269182","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The American Neurogastroenterology and Motility Society and the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging collaboratively wrote consensus statements to standardize gastric emptying scintigraphy. Despite this, centers are using nonstandard protocols. This study examined how these protocols contrast with standards. <b>Methods:</b> Consecutive charts were analyzed for meal, radionuclide dose, half-emptying time (T½) and its normal range, and documented retention and emptying. Impressions were compared with how emptying mapped on a graph based on standard 4-h values. <b>Results:</b> Thirty-four studies were identified. Ten of 14 abnormal studies were normal when plotted on the standard 4-h graph. Eight of 10 abnormal studies had normal 2- or 4-h retention. Normal T½ ranges varied significantly. Most altered the meal, and over 25% received a radionucleotide dose outside the recommended range. <b>Conclusion:</b> The upper bound of normal T½ falls within standard 4-h bounds, with many individuals given an erroneous impression. Though further optimization may be needed, adhering to standards is critical.</p>","PeriodicalId":16548,"journal":{"name":"Journal of nuclear medicine technology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of nuclear medicine technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2967/jnmt.124.269182","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The American Neurogastroenterology and Motility Society and the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging collaboratively wrote consensus statements to standardize gastric emptying scintigraphy. Despite this, centers are using nonstandard protocols. This study examined how these protocols contrast with standards. Methods: Consecutive charts were analyzed for meal, radionuclide dose, half-emptying time (T½) and its normal range, and documented retention and emptying. Impressions were compared with how emptying mapped on a graph based on standard 4-h values. Results: Thirty-four studies were identified. Ten of 14 abnormal studies were normal when plotted on the standard 4-h graph. Eight of 10 abnormal studies had normal 2- or 4-h retention. Normal T½ ranges varied significantly. Most altered the meal, and over 25% received a radionucleotide dose outside the recommended range. Conclusion: The upper bound of normal T½ falls within standard 4-h bounds, with many individuals given an erroneous impression. Though further optimization may be needed, adhering to standards is critical.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of nuclear medicine technology
Journal of nuclear medicine technology RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
15.40%
发文量
57
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信