Ibuprofen is Not Associated With an Elevated Bleeding Risk or Transfusion Requirement in Skin Grafting for Patients with Burn Injuries.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Artur Manasyan, Jordan O Gasho, Michael I Kim, Eloise W Stanton, Maxwell B Johnson, T Justin Gillenwater
{"title":"Ibuprofen is Not Associated With an Elevated Bleeding Risk or Transfusion Requirement in Skin Grafting for Patients with Burn Injuries.","authors":"Artur Manasyan, Jordan O Gasho, Michael I Kim, Eloise W Stanton, Maxwell B Johnson, T Justin Gillenwater","doi":"10.1093/jbcr/iraf015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Ibuprofen, a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID), can increase the risk of bleeding, a significant concern in burn surgery, which often involves substantial blood loss. This study aims to evaluate the safety of ibuprofen use in burn patients undergoing skin grafting. A retrospective case-control chart review was conducted for patients admitted with acute burn injury from 01/01/2024 to 07/31/2024 who underwent skin grafting. The primary outcome variables included perioperative transfusion requirement, bleeding, skin graft failure, and other complications. A total of 53 patients met inclusion criteria, 24 (45.2%) of whom received scheduled ibuprofen therapy during their hospitalization. The total body surface area affected was 12.3±9.3% for the non-ibuprofen group and 14.3±12.1% for the ibuprofen group (p=0.62). A total of 79.3% of patients in the non-ibuprofen group received meshed grafts compared to 79.2% in the ibuprofen group (p=0.734). Perioperative transfusion requirements were similar between the two cohorts, averaging 4.6±3.1 for the non-ibuprofen group and 3.2±2.8 units of packed red blood cells for the ibuprofen group (p=0.207). Skin graft failure (defined as need for re-grafting) occurred in 6.9% (n=2) of the non-ibuprofen cohort versus none (n=0) in the ibuprofen group (p=0.112). Postoperative complications did not vary significantly between the two groups for seroma (p=0.259), hematoma (p=0.498), and infection (p=0.568). There were no cases of hypersensitivity or gastrointestinal bleeding. There is likely no increased risk of bleeding or skin graft failure in burn injury patients taking ibuprofen, suggesting that these medications may be safe in this context.</p>","PeriodicalId":15205,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Burn Care & Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Burn Care & Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/iraf015","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ibuprofen, a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID), can increase the risk of bleeding, a significant concern in burn surgery, which often involves substantial blood loss. This study aims to evaluate the safety of ibuprofen use in burn patients undergoing skin grafting. A retrospective case-control chart review was conducted for patients admitted with acute burn injury from 01/01/2024 to 07/31/2024 who underwent skin grafting. The primary outcome variables included perioperative transfusion requirement, bleeding, skin graft failure, and other complications. A total of 53 patients met inclusion criteria, 24 (45.2%) of whom received scheduled ibuprofen therapy during their hospitalization. The total body surface area affected was 12.3±9.3% for the non-ibuprofen group and 14.3±12.1% for the ibuprofen group (p=0.62). A total of 79.3% of patients in the non-ibuprofen group received meshed grafts compared to 79.2% in the ibuprofen group (p=0.734). Perioperative transfusion requirements were similar between the two cohorts, averaging 4.6±3.1 for the non-ibuprofen group and 3.2±2.8 units of packed red blood cells for the ibuprofen group (p=0.207). Skin graft failure (defined as need for re-grafting) occurred in 6.9% (n=2) of the non-ibuprofen cohort versus none (n=0) in the ibuprofen group (p=0.112). Postoperative complications did not vary significantly between the two groups for seroma (p=0.259), hematoma (p=0.498), and infection (p=0.568). There were no cases of hypersensitivity or gastrointestinal bleeding. There is likely no increased risk of bleeding or skin graft failure in burn injury patients taking ibuprofen, suggesting that these medications may be safe in this context.

布洛芬与烧伤患者植皮出血风险升高或输血需求无关。
布洛芬是一种非甾体抗炎药(NSAID),可能会增加出血的风险,这是烧伤手术中一个重要的问题,通常会导致大量失血。本研究旨在评价布洛芬在植皮烧伤患者中的应用安全性。对2024年1月1日至7月31日收治的急性烧伤植皮患者进行回顾性病例-对照图分析。主要结局变量包括围手术期输血需求、出血、植皮失败和其他并发症。共有53例患者符合纳入标准,其中24例(45.2%)在住院期间接受了预定的布洛芬治疗。非布洛芬组影响体表面积为12.3±9.3%,布洛芬组为14.3±12.1% (p=0.62)。非布洛芬组患者接受网状移植物移植的比例为79.3%,而布洛芬组为79.2% (p=0.734)。两组患者围手术期输血需求相似,非布洛芬组平均为4.6±3.1单位,布洛芬组平均为3.2±2.8单位(p=0.207)。非布洛芬组皮肤移植失败(定义为需要再次移植)发生率为6.9% (n=2),而布洛芬组无一例(n=0) (p=0.112)。血清肿(p=0.259)、血肿(p=0.498)、感染(p=0.568)两组术后并发症无显著差异。无过敏或胃肠道出血病例。服用布洛芬的烧伤患者出血或皮肤移植失败的风险可能不会增加,这表明在这种情况下,这些药物可能是安全的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
21.40%
发文量
535
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Burn Care & Research provides the latest information on advances in burn prevention, research, education, delivery of acute care, and research to all members of the burn care team. As the official publication of the American Burn Association, this is the only U.S. journal devoted exclusively to the treatment and research of patients with burns. Original, peer-reviewed articles present the latest information on surgical procedures, acute care, reconstruction, burn prevention, and research and education. Other topics include physical therapy/occupational therapy, nutrition, current events in the evolving healthcare debate, and reports on the newest computer software for diagnostics and treatment. The Journal serves all burn care specialists, from physicians, nurses, and physical and occupational therapists to psychologists, counselors, and researchers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信