Basic verification of myocardial extracellular volume quantification by prototype photon-counting detector computed tomography: A phantom study.

IF 1.1 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Journal of Clinical Imaging Science Pub Date : 2025-02-11 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.25259/JCIS_157_2024
Seitaro Oda, Yoshinori Funama, Shinichi Kojima, Kazuma Yokoi, Isao Takahashi, Yuko Aoki, Taiga Goto, Kana Tanaka, Fuyuhiko Teramoto, Masafumi Kidoh, Yasunori Nagayama, Takeshi Nakaura, Toshinori Hirai
{"title":"Basic verification of myocardial extracellular volume quantification by prototype photon-counting detector computed tomography: A phantom study.","authors":"Seitaro Oda, Yoshinori Funama, Shinichi Kojima, Kazuma Yokoi, Isao Takahashi, Yuko Aoki, Taiga Goto, Kana Tanaka, Fuyuhiko Teramoto, Masafumi Kidoh, Yasunori Nagayama, Takeshi Nakaura, Toshinori Hirai","doi":"10.25259/JCIS_157_2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to investigate the accuracy of myocardial extracellular volume (ECV) quantification using a prototype photon-counting detector (PCD) computed tomography (CT) and examine the association between radiation dose and spectral image settings.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A multi-energy CT phantom that simulated the blood pool and myocardium was used. The tube voltage was set at 120 kVp and three types of tube current-time products (105, 150, and 300 mAs) were applied for pre- and post-contrast scans. Virtual monoenergetic images (VMIs) at 50-100 keV were reconstructed. The ECV value was calculated from the CT numbers between pre-contrast and post-contrast. We compared the accuracy of ECV values at each VMI level.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Each radiation dose setting demonstrated a small but significant difference in ECV values at each keV level. ECV was overestimated at higher keV in all radiation dose settings. A significant difference in ECV value variabilities was found among keV levels in all three radiation dose settings, with higher keV exhibiting greater variability. The variation was particularly large in the low-dose setting. The residual values were significantly larger at higher keV levels in all radiation dose settings. The residual values were smaller at 50 and 60 keV with no significant difference in 150- and 300-mAs settings.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Setting appropriate VMI keV and radiation dose settings was necessary when quantifying myocardial ECV with PCD-CT because the keV levels caused differences in the quantification value and measurement variation.</p>","PeriodicalId":15512,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Imaging Science","volume":"15 ","pages":"8"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11878665/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Imaging Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25259/JCIS_157_2024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the accuracy of myocardial extracellular volume (ECV) quantification using a prototype photon-counting detector (PCD) computed tomography (CT) and examine the association between radiation dose and spectral image settings.

Material and methods: A multi-energy CT phantom that simulated the blood pool and myocardium was used. The tube voltage was set at 120 kVp and three types of tube current-time products (105, 150, and 300 mAs) were applied for pre- and post-contrast scans. Virtual monoenergetic images (VMIs) at 50-100 keV were reconstructed. The ECV value was calculated from the CT numbers between pre-contrast and post-contrast. We compared the accuracy of ECV values at each VMI level.

Results: Each radiation dose setting demonstrated a small but significant difference in ECV values at each keV level. ECV was overestimated at higher keV in all radiation dose settings. A significant difference in ECV value variabilities was found among keV levels in all three radiation dose settings, with higher keV exhibiting greater variability. The variation was particularly large in the low-dose setting. The residual values were significantly larger at higher keV levels in all radiation dose settings. The residual values were smaller at 50 and 60 keV with no significant difference in 150- and 300-mAs settings.

Conclusion: Setting appropriate VMI keV and radiation dose settings was necessary when quantifying myocardial ECV with PCD-CT because the keV levels caused differences in the quantification value and measurement variation.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Imaging Science
Journal of Clinical Imaging Science RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
65
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Imaging Science (JCIS) is an open access peer-reviewed journal committed to publishing high-quality articles in the field of Imaging Science. The journal aims to present Imaging Science and relevant clinical information in an understandable and useful format. The journal is owned and published by the Scientific Scholar. Audience Our audience includes Radiologists, Researchers, Clinicians, medical professionals and students. Review process JCIS has a highly rigorous peer-review process that makes sure that manuscripts are scientifically accurate, relevant, novel and important. Authors disclose all conflicts, affiliations and financial associations such that the published content is not biased.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信