Update on the utilization of complementary therapies by adolescents with asthma in an urban population.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 ALLERGY
Journal of Asthma Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-08 DOI:10.1080/02770903.2025.2475451
Gary K Soffer, Termeh Feinberg, Hillary Kroll, Marina Reznik
{"title":"Update on the utilization of complementary therapies by adolescents with asthma in an urban population.","authors":"Gary K Soffer, Termeh Feinberg, Hillary Kroll, Marina Reznik","doi":"10.1080/02770903.2025.2475451","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess the prevalence and perceived efficacy of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) use among urban adolescents with asthma, building on a previous landmark study, and to determine if CAM use varied by asthma severity, asthma control test (ACT), and non-CAM prescriptions for asthma treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An adapted survey was completed by 203 patients aged 13-18 years in outpatient specialty and primary care clinics in the Bronx, NY. Demographic information, adherence to prescription(s), ACT, and past year CAM utilization, perceived efficacy of CAM used, and substitution for prescription were assessed <i>via</i> self-report while severity, and related active prescriptions were derived through electronic health records. We conducted logistic regressions to determine if CAM use (yes/no) was associated with ACT (controlled/uncontrolled) or severity (persistent/intermittent).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>82% of participants utilized at least one form of CAM in the management of their asthma. Mind-body (65%) and natural products (63%) were the most frequent with highest reported perceived efficacy (81%). Only 35% of patients discussed CAM use with their provider. ACT did not vary by CAM use (AOR: 1.57; 95%CI: 0.59, 4.15; <i>p</i> = 0.37), while prescription adherence was associated with a nearly seven-fold increase in CAM use (AOR: 7.79; 95%CI: 3.27, 18.54; <i>p</i><.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The prevalence of CAM use amongst Bronx adolescents with asthma has likely largely remained stable since an initial 2002 analysis. Despite a lack of association between CAM use and asthma control, there was a high degree of perceived efficacy. Adolescents who use CAM for asthma management may do so as an overall component of health-promoting behavior such as prescription adherence.</p>","PeriodicalId":15076,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Asthma","volume":" ","pages":"1304-1312"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Asthma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02770903.2025.2475451","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To assess the prevalence and perceived efficacy of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) use among urban adolescents with asthma, building on a previous landmark study, and to determine if CAM use varied by asthma severity, asthma control test (ACT), and non-CAM prescriptions for asthma treatment.

Methods: An adapted survey was completed by 203 patients aged 13-18 years in outpatient specialty and primary care clinics in the Bronx, NY. Demographic information, adherence to prescription(s), ACT, and past year CAM utilization, perceived efficacy of CAM used, and substitution for prescription were assessed via self-report while severity, and related active prescriptions were derived through electronic health records. We conducted logistic regressions to determine if CAM use (yes/no) was associated with ACT (controlled/uncontrolled) or severity (persistent/intermittent).

Results: 82% of participants utilized at least one form of CAM in the management of their asthma. Mind-body (65%) and natural products (63%) were the most frequent with highest reported perceived efficacy (81%). Only 35% of patients discussed CAM use with their provider. ACT did not vary by CAM use (AOR: 1.57; 95%CI: 0.59, 4.15; p = 0.37), while prescription adherence was associated with a nearly seven-fold increase in CAM use (AOR: 7.79; 95%CI: 3.27, 18.54; p<.0001).

Conclusions: The prevalence of CAM use amongst Bronx adolescents with asthma has likely largely remained stable since an initial 2002 analysis. Despite a lack of association between CAM use and asthma control, there was a high degree of perceived efficacy. Adolescents who use CAM for asthma management may do so as an overall component of health-promoting behavior such as prescription adherence.

城市青少年哮喘患者补充治疗的最新进展
目的:在之前一项具有里程碑意义的研究的基础上,评估城市青少年哮喘患者使用补充和替代医学(CAM)的患病率和感知疗效,并确定CAM的使用是否因哮喘严重程度、哮喘控制测试(ACT)和非辅助和替代医学处方的哮喘治疗而变化。方法:对纽约州布朗克斯区门诊专科和初级保健诊所的203名年龄在13-18岁的患者进行了适应性调查。通过自我报告评估人口统计信息、对处方的依从性、ACT和过去一年的CAM使用情况、使用CAM的感知疗效和处方替代,而严重性和相关的主动处方通过电子健康记录得出。我们进行了逻辑回归,以确定CAM的使用(是/否)是否与ACT(受控/非受控)或严重程度(持续/间歇性)相关。结果:82%的参与者使用至少一种形式的CAM来管理他们的哮喘。身心(65%)和天然产品(63%)是最常见的,报告的感知功效最高(81%)。只有35%的患者与他们的医生讨论了CAM的使用。ACT没有因CAM的使用而变化(AOR: 1.57;95%ci: 0.59, 4.15;p = 0.37),而处方依从性与CAM使用增加近7倍相关(AOR: 7.79;95%ci: 3.27, 18.54;结论:自2002年的初步分析以来,布朗克斯青少年哮喘患者中CAM的使用率可能基本保持稳定。尽管CAM的使用与哮喘控制之间缺乏联系,但有高度的感知疗效。使用辅助药物治疗哮喘的青少年可以将其作为促进健康行为的一个整体组成部分,如遵守处方。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Asthma
Journal of Asthma 医学-过敏
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
158
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Providing an authoritative open forum on asthma and related conditions, Journal of Asthma publishes clinical research around such topics as asthma management, critical and long-term care, preventative measures, environmental counselling, and patient education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信